wildcam Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 I would never trade Tanev, Baertchi and 2nd round pick would be 36th overall next year for -- Landeskog 24 yrs old is too high..like what we are developing so lets see what we have in a few years.. We have 6 good forward prospects that will be NHL ready in 3 years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DinoTambo Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 It would take Baertschi and Juolevi to begin Landeskog discussions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammertime Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Juolevi would be the price. I'd do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Juolevi/Boeser I'm guessing would be the base of a deal. Not sure I want either of these fellers being traded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kloubek Posted September 27, 2017 Share Posted September 27, 2017 On 25/09/2017 at 9:36 PM, wildcam said: I would never trade Tanev, Baertchi and 2nd round pick would be 36th overall next year for -- Landeskog 24 yrs old is too high. i wouldn't do that either. Baertschi will be a fine 2nd liner.... just with perhaps slightly less skill and far less grit. So basically its Tanev plus a 2nd for that grit? Heck no. I'd say Tanev plus fourth would be fair. But Sakic would have to appreciate Tanev's shot suppression for it to even be considered. Besides that, Tanev is our biggest trading chip. Benning seems content to hold it unless the deal is right, and I believe that deal would have to be for a true elite player, or at least a guy highly likely to become one soon. We have plenty of solid 2nd line talent alteady. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.