Alflives Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 Just heard on 650 am that Getzlaf and Kesler are both out for a couple months, and the Ducks are looking for another center. At what price do we help them out, by trading them Granny? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonMexico Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 Since you are offering to 'help' them, I will take Fowler straight across and settle for nothing less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 Kesler and Getzlaf are out for a couple of months? Good timing with the Canucks in town. Sounds like it could be a good opportunity to make a trade with them. Sam Gagner? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apollo Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 Helping Anaheim... hmmmm. I say kick em when they're down. Jimbo should have a dumpster truck deliver 10 tonnes of manure to their GM's drive way, and Perry's drive way... Then offer Granlund for Kesler (2 mill retained duration of contract) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rabbit Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 Need us to help them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cramarossa Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 29 minutes ago, Alflives said: At what price do we help them out, by trading them Granny? We don't. But if we did, it would be for Gagner I imagine, not Granny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted November 8, 2017 Author Share Posted November 8, 2017 Just now, Cramarossa said: We don't. But if we did, it would be for Gagner I imagine, not Granny. I'd much prefer Gagner, as would most of us Canuck's fans, but he still has two more years on his contract after this one. I think Granny, costing less, and being younger with less term, could actually entice a nice return. I'm just not too certain what that return could be? Plus, Granny would be closer to you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
higgyfan Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 Gagner or Granlund are not good enough to be 1C or 2C on a contending team (even if it's for the short haul). Of the two, I keep Granny. He's the Swiss Army Knife type and can also play in the top 6 as a W. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 3 minutes ago, Cramarossa said: We don't. But if we did, it would be for Gagner I imagine, not Granny. thats not a bad idea, they have tons of LTIR space and also a lot of expiring contracts too, so if they can see Gagner in their long term plans as well it could happen. So maybe something like ANA's 4th and 7th for full salary, or a 3rd and prospect for us retaining 500k. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 19 minutes ago, apollo said: Helping Anaheim... hmmmm. I say kick em when they're down. Jimbo should have a dumpster truck deliver 10 tonnes of manure to their GM's drive way, and Perry's drive way... Then offer Granlund for Kesler (2 mill retained duration of contract) Kesler wanted out of Vancouver. And frankly, with his attitude, he should have been traded to Chicago after the Sochi Olympics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cramarossa Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 8 minutes ago, Alflives said: I'd much prefer Gagner, as would most of us Canuck's fans, but he still has two more years on his contract after this one. I think Granny, costing less, and being younger with less term, could actually entice a nice return. I'm just not too certain what that return could be? Plus, Granny would be closer to you. I keep forgetting he's got the three year contract ugh! Would be great to see more Granlund but not if he's on the enemy team. It still hurts too see Juice and Millsy in those colors Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 Geez, all they would have at C is Vermette and Rakell. They also have a lot of good D. Let's make a deal! To ANA: Gagner and Hutton To VAN: Lindholm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PunjabiCanucks Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 Gagner over Granlund please Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guile Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 13 minutes ago, NUCKER67 said: Geez, all they would have at C is Vermette and Rakell. They also have a lot of good D. Let's make a deal! To ANA: Gagner and Hutton To VAN: Lindholm That's slightly lopsided, no? Lindholm is Anaheim's Tanev - no chance they part ways with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toni Zamboni Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 im surprised you arent trying to boot tanev out the door in this package as well. get rid of granny?, heck no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 1 minute ago, Guile said: That's slightly lopsided, no? Lindholm is Anaheim's Tanev - no chance they part ways with him. well, I was going to suggest Vatanen, but I doubt they'd give him up. How 'bout (C) Jayson Megna for his brother (D) Jaycob Megna? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForsbergTheGreat Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 40 minutes ago, Jimmy McGill said: thats not a bad idea, they have tons of LTIR space and also a lot of expiring contracts too, so if they can see Gagner in their long term plans as well it could happen. So maybe something like ANA's 4th and 7th for full salary, or a 3rd and prospect for us retaining 500k. Gagner could work, Gagner and Cogliano have a history and proven chemistry together so maybe that would entice them for the short term. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VanGnome Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 No salary retention on our part. Gagner + Gaunce + 5th for Vatanen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 35 minutes ago, ForsbergTheGreat said: Gagner could work, Gagner and Cogliano have a history and proven chemistry together so maybe that would entice them for the short term. Gagner, Hutton, 2 2nds for Lindholm or Fowler? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted November 8, 2017 Share Posted November 8, 2017 Gagner and Edler for Vatanen Edler might waive to go to ANA? (reunite with Kesler and Bieksa, close to LA, warm climate, etc) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.