kenhodgejr Posted November 12, 2017 Share Posted November 12, 2017 To Toronto: Eric Gudbranson (playoff help for team toughness) To Vancouver: Timothy Liljegren Puck moving defence man- right shot prospect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roberts Posted November 12, 2017 Share Posted November 12, 2017 please no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billabong Posted November 12, 2017 Share Posted November 12, 2017 If I’m trading guddy it’s for a more certain thing not a project Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manroth19 Posted November 12, 2017 Share Posted November 12, 2017 Toronto laughs. Perfect target to fit with juelevi in our prospect pool tho. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manroth19 Posted November 12, 2017 Share Posted November 12, 2017 16 minutes ago, billabong said: If I’m trading guddy it’s for a more certain thing not a project You actually wouldn’t make that deal? For a potential stud 1D? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHitman Posted November 12, 2017 Share Posted November 12, 2017 Benning would be godly if he made that trade happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PunjabiCanucks Posted November 12, 2017 Share Posted November 12, 2017 Fair deal imo if Guddy had better corsi stats . We always say Tanev for a 1st rd and Kapenen, which some say is fair and other say we are asking for too much Guddy for a 1st rd pick player essentially is our trade, we may need to add a 3rd / 4th rd pick tho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blue Jay 22 Posted November 12, 2017 Share Posted November 12, 2017 Toronto laughs and hangs up. Whatever the opposite of a whipping boy is, that's what Gudbranson is on CDC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shazzam Posted November 13, 2017 Share Posted November 13, 2017 They have Polak, he does more of the same Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted November 13, 2017 Share Posted November 13, 2017 17 hours ago, kenhodgejr said: To Toronto: Eric Gudbranson (playoff help for team toughness) To Vancouver: Timothy Liljegren Puck moving defence man- right shot prospect Liljegren is a Smurf. No thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks25 Posted November 13, 2017 Share Posted November 13, 2017 Toronto needs someone who can play defense against top lines, Gudbranson isn't that. Tanev to Toronto, however, is a perfect fit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted November 13, 2017 Share Posted November 13, 2017 20 hours ago, Blue Jay 22 said: Toronto laughs and hangs up. Whatever the opposite of a whipping boy is, that's what Gudbranson is on CDC. What do you mean? It's pretty split down the middle in terms of people wanting him and people wanting him gone. He doesn't really get blamed for anything, but he also doesn't really get credit for anything. He's kind of just "steady". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuckmen84 Posted November 13, 2017 Share Posted November 13, 2017 On 11/11/2017 at 11:58 PM, kenhodgejr said: To Toronto: Eric Gudbranson (playoff help for team toughness) To Vancouver: Timothy Liljegren Puck moving defence man- right shot prospect Not a bad proposal, at this point i would take anything that included a 1st round picked prospect or 1st round draft pick for Guddy rather than losing him at free agency for nothing. If there was a chance we could render Guddys services for under 4 Mill a year then i would be game to keep him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted November 13, 2017 Share Posted November 13, 2017 17 hours ago, kanucks25 said: Toronto needs someone who can play defense against top lines, Gudbranson isn't that. Tanev to Toronto, however, is a perfect fit. Tanev will cost A LOT more than Liljegren, don’t you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kanucks25 Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 2 hours ago, Alflives said: Tanev will cost A LOT more than Liljegren, don’t you think? Toronto fans would say no, Canucks fans would say yes. It's a tricky question because there is a debate as to Liljegren's potential: some believe he has dynamic top-pairing potential whereas others think he's too weak/small/not good enough defensively to excel in that role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucklehead73 Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 Even if you pretend Toronto is interested gudbranson is a UFA making his value much lower to any team trading for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted November 14, 2017 Share Posted November 14, 2017 8 minutes ago, kanucks25 said: Toronto fans would say no, Canucks fans would say yes. It's a tricky question because there is a debate as to Liljegren's potential: some believe he has dynamic top-pairing potential whereas others think he's too weak/small/not good enough defensively to excel in that role. Maybe a PK or a Jordan Subban, but just don’t know yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sbriggs Posted November 16, 2017 Share Posted November 16, 2017 On 12/11/2017 at 12:54 AM, manroth19 said: Toronto laughs. Perfect target to fit with juelevi in our prospect pool tho. Your right TO never does this but good idea if we could Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sbriggs Posted November 16, 2017 Share Posted November 16, 2017 On 13/11/2017 at 7:02 AM, N7Nucks said: What do you mean? It's pretty split down the middle in terms of people wanting him and people wanting him gone. He doesn't really get blamed for anything, but he also doesn't really get credit for anything. He's kind of just "steady". I don't think most want gone they just don't want to over pay for him. I'd keep him he's still young and has that element you need to have to win it all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted November 16, 2017 Share Posted November 16, 2017 I think we have to many projects right now and in a couple years we will know what we have,but to move a guy that can help right now is not the answer at this time, maybe TDL if we cannot resign him but now is not the time unless we get a trade offer JB can not say NO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.