Bo53Horvat Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 https://www.google.ca/amp/s/www.prohockeyrumors.com/2017/11/maple-leafs-have-interest-in-erik-gudbranson.html/amp Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 Guddy to Ottawa for Chabot. Sounds fair to this CUNUCK’S fan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 I just don't know if what they're willing to give up would be enough for me to be happy to part with him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coastal.view Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 we need a pool of interested teams to which a trade for gud can be considered i doubt he will be prepared to sign a new contract with the canucks for salary and term that makes sense for this team if he fills a specific need / role on a playoff team that could enhance his trade value so the canucks need to keep all their options open Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bo53Horvat Posted November 18, 2017 Author Share Posted November 18, 2017 8 minutes ago, canuck73_3 said: I just don't know if what they're willing to give up would be enough for me to be happy to part with him. Timothy Liljegren Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 Just now, Bo53Horvat said: Timothy Liljegren With how much he fell in the draft and what Gudbranson brings that's not enough of a return imho. And I doubt the Leafs would be willing to add enough to make it worth it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PunjabiCanucks Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 1st round pick? Tanev potentially would have got us that and Kapenen and possibly more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Building Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 4 1st round picks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LegionOfDoom Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 2 minutes ago, Bo53Horvat said: Timothy Liljegren And? We gave up McCann and a ....33?? I just don't see how his value has dropped since coming here. I thought he has been a rock for us on the back end and would be disappointed in us losing our only tough dman, sbisa going in the draft was okay with me cuz we still had guddy for physical play. I want another young proven guy in return if guddy goes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
higgyfan Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 Leaf's always like to low-ball in trade talks. Stay away from them JB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush17 Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 oh i like the sound of this! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 who is the source? (not clcking on the link). Can you post the substance (or not) of this rumour in the OP - just a link to an outside source isn't really enough imo - just creates traffic for an outside site. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR]. For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC]. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rush17 Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 5 minutes ago, oldnews said: who is the source? (not clcking on the link). Can you post the substance (or not) of this rumour in the OP - just a link to an outside source isn't really enough imo - just creates traffic for an outside side. the links virus free. says leafs, mtl, ott all may have interest. leafs want a d man before holiday break. ott says they like their d reporter believes they may want d depth at tdl for post season. more tor and mtl that are interested. fla apparently has moved on and isnt interested in requiring his services. (they likely think they can nab him in free agency or have new plans. - this is my speculation) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silky mitts Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 Kapanen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRAZY_4_NAZZY Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 Andrew Nielsen and a 1st please if you must trade Gudbranson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconuts Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 The Leafs can keep their grubby mitts off our Guddy, they're an organization that'll never want to pay us fairly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trebreh Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 This 'rumor' was started by John Shannon at the end of his interview with Spn650 like two weeks ago.. then the rest of the Toronto sportsnet network jumped in the bandwagon. I hope JB extends Guddy soon to make these toronto insiders look stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 34 minutes ago, oldnews said: who is the source? (not clcking on the link). Can you post the substance (or not) of this rumour in the OP - just a link to an outside source isn't really enough imo - just creates traffic for an outside site. Isn't the source of the rumour embedded within the link? "Pro hockey Rumours. Com"? Seriously, CDC says that rumours from Eklund are okay, so why not this source? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bloodycanuckleheads Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 You people don't seriously believe we could get something of value for him, do you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.