• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.
Bo53Horvat

(Rumour) Maple Leafs Have Interest In Erik Gudbranson

Recommended Posts

Gud + 3rd for Nylander is what I imagine the brainiacs 'round here are thinking. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gudbranson for Marner with pieces thrown in. There has been talk of Marner being surplus in the centre role. Not saying straight up is fair but could be part of the mechanics?

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, oldnews said:

who is the source? (not clcking on the link).

 

Can you post the substance (or not) of this rumour in the OP - just a link to an outside source isn't really enough imo - just creates traffic for an outside site.

 TVA Sports’ Renaud Lavoie reported on a radio appearance with Sportsnet 590 - there's an audio link

 

The idea of Kapanen is funny, we could have had him for free off waivers. 

 

If Liljegren was in play i think Jim has to take that seriously, but then we have to go out and get some toughness elsewhere maybe in free agency. 

  • Hydration 1
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, canuckpuckluck15 said:

Gudbranson for Marner with pieces thrown in. There has been talk of Marner being surplus in the centre role. Not saying straight up is fair but could be part of the mechanics?

Gudbranson + a lot more than we want to give up ... for Marner.  :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Alflives said:

Guddy to Ottawa for Chabot.  Sounds fair to this CUNUCK’S fan.  :lol:

you know thats not a crazy idea. Guddy would be going home and is probably very happy to sign an extension as part of this. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jimmy McGill said:

you know thats not a crazy idea. Guddy would be going home and is probably very happy to sign an extension as part of this. 

Dorion would be pitchforked if he made that deal.  Heck he should be pitchforked already!  I thought Chabot was their Juiolevvi?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Alflives said:

Dorion would be pitchforked if he made that deal.  Heck he should be pitchforked already!  I thought Chabot was their Juiolevvi?  

they're in all-in mode now though. Guddy would be a great playoff piece for them. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Sean Monahan said:

Huh?

ack, my mistake. i thought he wasn't waiver protected. sorry 'bout that. 

 

Its still laughable tho. We'd need way more than him. 

Edited by Jimmy McGill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another thread with basically no source. Not sure why mods don't lock these, or at least move them to the proposals forum? 

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, DownUndaCanuck said:

Gudbranson + 2nd round pick for Liljegren + 4th round pick?

 

  • Hydration 2
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Alflives said:

6 million people want out of the GTO, especially in January!  :lol:

don't they all go to the cottage in the summer too? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With how much Bennington 9000 gave up for him, value would have to be a kings ransom. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.