Ghostsof1915 Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 27 minutes ago, Pears said: Why would we trade our only source of toughness for less than what would be fair value? I’ll let you figure that out. Because stay at home defensemen are viewed as nothing by a lot of CDC'ers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 1 minute ago, RRypien37 said: With how much Bennington 9000 gave up for him, value would have to be a kings ransom. No other gm cares what Vancouver gave up to get Gudbranson. They'll offer what they think he's worth. (Which is likely far less than what Vancouver gave up). He's a pending UFA now. Something he wasn't when Vancouver traded for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 1 hour ago, bloodycanuckleheads said: You people don't seriously believe we could get something of value for him, do you? I thought you needed a beer, for the pounding your comment will bring you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 24 minutes ago, DownUndaCanuck said: Gudbranson + 2nd round pick for Liljegren + 4th 1st round pick? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilduce39 Posted November 18, 2017 Share Posted November 18, 2017 If Chabot or Liljegren we’re in play I’d be interested. Like S’all said, though, JB would need to look for some leadership / truculence for the back end though. I’d expect Guddy to only be traded for a premium considering he fills a void on this team that I consider to be lacking WITH him in the lineup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 The Fleas got 2 2nd's in 2018. - take the better one(TO, SJ) - Polak - some C for the farm(we're short there, they say) Cut our losses on Gud. Handles the puck like a live grenade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samurai Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 1 hour ago, 6string said: Here's a rumor, Toronto's Auston Matthews wants out of Toronto. Pass it around! Not a rumor. As a UFA he is going to the Yotes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ossi Vaananen Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 Not bad as far as sources go. He quotes an interview from Lavoie, as we all know, he has some connection to the Canucks org, as he's broken stories before anyone out west. I believe he broke the Burrows trade before anyone else. I'd be willing to do it for a prospect like Liljgren(sp?) or Kapanen. We could have Tanev and Stecher back as early as this roadtrip, then we're starting to look crowded on the backend. I honestly think Hutton or Gudbranson would be better scratches over Pouliot; so, now is a good time to trade one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RRypien37 Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 1 hour ago, qwijibo said: No other gm cares what Vancouver gave up to get Gudbranson. They'll offer what they think he's worth. (Which is likely far less than what Vancouver gave up). He's a pending UFA now. Something he wasn't when Vancouver traded for him. Thanks for that. New and ground breaking. I look forward to your future top source tidbits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 10 minutes ago, Ossi Vaananen said: Not bad as far as sources go. He quotes an interview from Lavoie, as we all know, he has some connection to the Canucks org, as he's broken stories before anyone out west. I believe he broke the Burrows trade before anyone else. I'd be willing to do it for a prospect like Liljgren(sp?) or Kapanen. We could have Tanev and Stecher back as early as this roadtrip, then we're starting to look crowded on the backend. I honestly think Hutton or Gudbranson would be better scratches over Pouliot; so, now is a good time to trade one. Goldobin and Lind>Kapanen we need D, so it has to be Liljegren or a lot of picks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicklas Bo Hunter Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 Andrew nielsen+ 1st or 2nd would be good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 33 minutes ago, Nuxfanabroad said: The Fleas got 2 2nd's in 2018. - take the better one(TO, SJ) - Polak - some C for the farm(we're short there, they say) Cut our losses on Gud. Handles the puck like a live grenade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
combover Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 I’d be willing to bet there are no less than 20 teams that would love to have Gud. Funny thing is we are/should be one of them. sign (soon)or let the bidding war begin. A 1st and prospect would be the minimum opening price and No picks going back not even a 5th. I big d man that uses his size stands up for his mates and is still young and developing I just don’t get why they’d let this guy go,unless he doesn’t want to be here,we have enough fluff we don’t have another guy in the system like him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smithers joe Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 you can be sure that toronto will only be interested in moving the guys they have been trying to get rid off for a couple of years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 4 minutes ago, smithers joe said: you can be sure that toronto will only be interested in moving the guys they have been trying to get rid off for a couple of years. JVR? YUK!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
higgyfan Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 23 minutes ago, combover said: I’d be willing to bet there are no less than 20 teams that would love to have Gud. Funny thing is we are/should be one of them. sign (soon)or let the bidding war begin. A 1st and prospect would be the minimum opening price and No picks going back not even a 5th. I big d man that uses his size stands up for his mates and is still young and developing I just don’t get why they’d let this guy go,unless he doesn’t want to be here,we have enough fluff we don’t have another guy in the system like him. Oh how they used to whine about how soft the Canucks were. When was the last time you saw anyone whining around here about how the team gets physically dominated? Um hmmm. So now the peeps wanna toss Guddy aside for Krapanen or Lilygreen? Um hummm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billabong Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 Best case scenario we re sign guddy BUT if we wants 5yrs and 4.5m+ then gud bye! Id happily give him 4x4 or around that dollar figure but that’s 5th year is a deal breaker if he wants max money to tor: gudbranson to van: kapanen, liljegren oooorrrr pipedream to van: nylander to tor: gudbranson, granlund, 2nd pick 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Topcheeze86 Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 Guddy has been our most consistent leader on the back end this guy needs to be signed not traded Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 8 minutes ago, billabong said: Best case scenario we re sign guddy BUT if we wants 5yrs and 4.5m+ then gud bye! Id happily give him 4x4 or around that dollar figure but that’s 5th year is a deal breaker if he wants max money to tor: gudbranson to van: kapanen, liljegren oooorrrr pipedream to van: nylander to tor: gudbranson, granlund, 2nd pick 2018 Guddy at $4.5 million or the last Edler for $5 million for 6. I'd rather see Gudbranson at $5 million than Edler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted November 19, 2017 Share Posted November 19, 2017 Agree(with any) who believe there should be a AAV/term here that's a threshold. Either sign reasonably, or make a deal(cos' UFA) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.