Blömqvist Posted December 13, 2017 Share Posted December 13, 2017 On 2017-12-08 at 12:09 PM, Crimson said: It would leave us in a much better spot if we could swing Hutton+ instead of moving Tanev. Baertschi + Hutton + VAN 2nd for Reinhart Would suck to lose Baertschi after him having a really good season playing alongside Horvat and Boeser as well as a young #4/5 defenseman in Hutton, but Reinhart has a chance to be a star in this league and this team needs more star power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekker Posted January 14, 2018 Share Posted January 14, 2018 Time to revisit this one. Rienharts value is plummeting. Jakes is rising. We could use a center???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuck1991 Posted January 14, 2018 Share Posted January 14, 2018 hutton + goldobin +2nd round for reinhart + 3rd round Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted January 14, 2018 Share Posted January 14, 2018 4 hours ago, rekker said: Time to revisit this one. Rienharts value is plummeting. Jakes is rising. We could use a center???? Maybe we keep Jake? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekker Posted January 14, 2018 Share Posted January 14, 2018 2 minutes ago, Alflives said: Maybe we keep Jake? For sure. Love Jake and he's progressing slowly but surely. Would be nice to snag Reinhart. Was spitballing wondering what it would take to get SR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekker Posted January 14, 2018 Share Posted January 14, 2018 Buffalo needs D. Tanev is overpayment for SR me thinks. Hutton not enough. Kind of tough to gauge SR value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KKnight Posted January 14, 2018 Share Posted January 14, 2018 14 minutes ago, rekker said: Buffalo needs D. Tanev is overpayment for SR me thinks. Hutton not enough. Kind of tough to gauge SR value. Only has 11 or so points. Definitely looks like he needs a change of scenery. Still very skilled. I don't think Hutton + Goldy is that far off. IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted January 14, 2018 Share Posted January 14, 2018 13 minutes ago, rekker said: Buffalo needs D. Tanev is overpayment for SR me thinks. Hutton not enough. Kind of tough to gauge SR value. I used to want ?Sam too, but I’m wondering if he’s one of those tweener guys: not skilled enough for top six, and not tough enough for bottom six? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted January 15, 2018 Share Posted January 15, 2018 How is his skating. On HF they seem to be always complaining about how he can't keep up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekker Posted January 15, 2018 Share Posted January 15, 2018 4 minutes ago, KKnight said: Only has 11 or so points. Definitely looks like he needs a change of scenery. Still very skilled. I don't think Hutton + Goldy is that far off. IMO He is really struggling. I don't watch him enough to comment. I remember his draft and all they could talk about was his smarts. I seem to remember reading something about SR and Eichel not getting along so well. I see Hutton. I think would need more than Goldy. Hutton and Granlund for SR? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KKnight Posted January 15, 2018 Share Posted January 15, 2018 1 minute ago, rekker said: He is really struggling. I don't watch him enough to comment. I remember his draft and all they could talk about was his smarts. I seem to remember reading something about SR and Eichel not getting along so well. I see Hutton. I think would need more than Goldy. Hutton and Granlund for SR? I think he would be great for our second unit power play. Not a huge fan of his two way play, but on the power play, he seems to understand where to be. Definitely a smart player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted January 15, 2018 Share Posted January 15, 2018 Just now, rekker said: He is really struggling. I don't watch him enough to comment. I remember his draft and all they could talk about was his smarts. I seem to remember reading something about SR and Eichel not getting along so well. I see Hutton. I think would need more than Goldy. Hutton and Granlund for SR? Reinhart and Eichel are roommates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekker Posted January 15, 2018 Share Posted January 15, 2018 3 minutes ago, mll said: Reinhart and Eichel are 4 minutes ago, mll said: Reinhart and Eichel are roommates. Good to know. Must of been SR and a different teammate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underrated Posted January 15, 2018 Share Posted January 15, 2018 Interesting. If we could take a chance on Reinhart for a package like Hutton and Goldobin (or Granlund) then I'd go for it. If we have to trade a guy like Jake, it's a bit of a gamble but could pay off if our scouts think Reinhardt could still become elite. But any more than that and I think we just stand pat. In terms of trading Jake, the guy I'd be looking for in return (if we're talking about a young player that just hasn't really broken into the league yet), I'd go for Sanheim out of Philly. We have lots of young forward prospects, but are lacking on potential top pairing defenseman outside of Juolevi. Sanheim is stuck behind elite young d-men, he's a good big young player, and Jake fits the type of player that Philly loves. Hopefully a win-win for both teams. Maybe Jake could be a long term option alongside Nolan Patrick? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekker Posted January 15, 2018 Share Posted January 15, 2018 4 hours ago, underrated said: Interesting. If we could take a chance on Reinhart for a package like Hutton and Goldobin (or Granlund) then I'd go for it. If we have to trade a guy like Jake, it's a bit of a gamble but could pay off if our scouts think Reinhardt could still become elite. But any more than that and I think we just stand pat. In terms of trading Jake, the guy I'd be looking for in return (if we're talking about a young player that just hasn't really broken into the league yet), I'd go for Sanheim out of Philly. We have lots of young forward prospects, but are lacking on potential top pairing defenseman outside of Juolevi. Sanheim is stuck behind elite young d-men, he's a good big young player, and Jake fits the type of player that Philly loves. Hopefully a win-win for both teams. Maybe Jake could be a long term option alongside Nolan Patrick? Whatever the scenario I feel it may come to a forward moved for a D. Especially if we draft another forward this year. That may well happen if Tkachuk is there when we pick. Someone will need to be moved for a D. If it needs to be them Jake for Samheim would be a fair deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.