VegasCanuck Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 1 hour ago, -Vintage Canuck- said: Burmistrov for Karlsson??? I could totally live with that!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 16 minutes ago, VegasCanuck said: Burmistrov for Karlsson??? I could totally live with that!!! In all seriousness a karlsson deal would be at minimum Baer,OJ,Demko and a 1st.... then you have to give him 10 mil per season! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRAZY_4_NAZZY Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 JIM FIND US A RECLAMATION PROSPECT I KNOW YOU CAN. IMO, if the goal is to trade Gudbranson at the deadline, use Burmi to get someone to replace Guddy's physical presence. I hear Florida is shopping Petrovic, and is looking for a centre....do it JB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 Just now, CRAZY_4_NAZZY said: JIM FIND US A RECLAMATION PROSPECT I KNOW YOU CAN. IMO, if the goal is to trade Gudbranson at the deadline, use Burmi to get someone to replace Guddy's physical presence. I hear Florida is shopping Petrovic, and is looking for a centre....do it JB. gagner for petrovic sounds better to me! Burmi will net a very late pick at best, he was on waivers last year, i expect the same to happen this year with a team claiming him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 Doubt it would be a popular trade offer but Burmistrov to Pittsburgh for Corrado/Tinordi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coryberg Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 14 minutes ago, Yotes said: Doubt it would be a popular trade offer but Burmistrov to Pittsburgh for Corrado/Tinordi Id rather waive him and have him claimed. The contract spot is worth more than either of those guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkpoet Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 Ducks, Canadiens and Rangers all looking for Center depth https://mynhltraderumors.com/nhl-rumors-teams-that-are-looking-for-a-forward-rick-nash-ny-rangers/2017/11/15/ Get snooping, Bennington Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 2 minutes ago, darkpoet said: Ducks, Canadiens and Rangers all looking for Center depth https://mynhltraderumors.com/nhl-rumors-teams-that-are-looking-for-a-forward-rick-nash-ny-rangers/2017/11/15/ Get snooping, Bennington What's Burmistrov realistically worth though? I think teams will wait for him to go on waivers, and then take their chances. Heck, he might even clear, and get sent to Utica! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucklehead80 Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 If looking at just a pick, would a 4th be fair value? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
combover Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 This just in Canucks May be shopping brumistrov. It’s not even Canucks ARE shopping its they might be but the source of the rumour doesn’t know. lol. Slow news day better make something up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 1 hour ago, Ossi Vaananen said: His replacement: ----------------- Some perspective though, because I think Brough is making a lot out of nothing. Here's the quote: And good on Dhaliwal for contacting the Agent And this post highlights the difference between a real solid, and competent source in Rick Dhaliwal, and a chucklehead like Jason Brough who's cut from the same poop-stained cloth as Botchford/Patterson/Sekeres and the rest of those weasels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
darkpoet Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 11 minutes ago, Alflives said: What's Burmistrov realistically worth though? I think teams will wait for him to go on waivers, and then take their chances. Heck, he might even clear, and get sent to Utica! I'm not doing a deep dive on this one but there are a lot of things one could look into with regards to his value to another team. For instance, say you're looking at making a deal with one of the three teams I mentioned above. Are any of them carrying a player with whom Burmi has played with before, and specifically, anyone with whom he's shown chemistry with in the past? (just an example) Would we have had the same level of interest in Goldobin when we traded for him, if we didn't already have Boucher? (referencing their past chemistry in junior) Transactions can be weird creatures...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 1 hour ago, Jimmy McGill said: Ricks the only credible source in Vancouver You mean, as opposed to Botching up rumours and Patersoning speculation based on nothing just to Pratt up the gossip? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 12 minutes ago, darkpoet said: I'm not doing a deep dive on this one but there are a lot of things one could look into with regards to his value to another team. For instance, say you're looking at making a deal with one of the three teams I mentioned above. Are any of them carrying a player with whom Burmi has played with before, and specifically, anyone with whom he's shown chemistry with in the past? (just an example) Would we have had the same level of interest in Goldobin when we traded for him, if we didn't already have Boucher? (referencing their past chemistry in junior) Transactions can be weird creatures...... Maybe Burmistrov could become part of a bigger deal? Burmistrov + Gudbranson + ? for something nice from Florida?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diamonds Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 29 minutes ago, canucklehead80 said: If looking at just a pick, would a 4th be fair value? That would be my guess. Maybe if lucky we could get a low 3rd at the deadline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 4 minutes ago, Diamonds said: That would be my guess. Maybe if lucky we could get a low 3rd at the deadline. Add those two together and that's what I think we can get for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIC_CITY Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 1 hour ago, coryberg said: In all seriousness a karlsson deal would be at minimum Baer,OJ,Demko and a 1st.... then you have to give him 10 mil per season! Am I the only one that would contemplate making this deal? When he's on, Karlsson is in the discussion for best player on the planet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 2 minutes ago, 73 Percent said: Add those two together and that's what I think we can get for him. conditional 7th would be my guess too. but best bet is he goes on waivers soon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIC_CITY Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 1 minute ago, Yotes said: conditional 7th would be my guess too. but best bet is he goes on waivers soon There's no way we get a draft pick for Burmistrov. He'll likely hit waivers this week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucklehead80 Posted December 11, 2017 Share Posted December 11, 2017 2 minutes ago, VIC_CITY said: Am I the only one that would contemplate making this deal? When he's on, Karlsson is in the discussion for best player on the planet. Not close enough to finishing a rebuild in my opinion. Giving up your goalie of the future, future top pair dman, and a top pick when we still are a ways off from contending is not the right move at this time. I think that would probably put us back where we’ve been the last handful of years, a middle of the pack team that has mortgaged its future once again. This organization has done enough of that while we were contenders, which is fine when the door is still open. Not so much when the door is closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.