TonyStrecher Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 1 hour ago, VIC_CITY said: Honestly, right now the odds are against OJ developing into a top pairing defenseman. He's still really young but he hasn't developed at the rate we would have liked. No one really knows what he will end up being but to give Demko and a 1st round pick to turn OJ into one of the best players in the NHL, that's a pretty good deal IMO. Baer is just a throw in and can be replaced fairly easily. Not to say he has zero value but I could care less about moving Baertschi. Timing wise, sure, we'd like to be a year or 2 further into our rebuild when adding a piece like Karlsson but we're arguably a better team than Ottawa even without Karlsson. Add in Karlsson and who knows, maybe we could go on a cinderella run? We'd surely be a playoff team and there would be a buzz surrounding this team that we haven't seen in a while. Juolevi has been developing quite well this year. It sucks that Matthew Tkachuk with the next pick after him, but defensemen usually take longer to develop and I trust that Jim Benning wouldn't have picked Juolevi if he didn't have #1 dman potential. If Juolevi could be part of a package for Karlsson, I wouldn't object to it, but I think that Karlsson will be past his peak by the time the Canucks are competing for the Stanley Cup again. I'd rather have a 25 year old Juolevi, Demko in net and whatever else is included than a 33 year old Karlsson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Topcheeze86 Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 Bag of pucks and some practice pilons hmm maybe throw in a case of beer we gotta deal hes been completely uneffective every game he has been in i cant see any team wanting him but who knows benning could package him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 As fans we love depth, but gotta imagine too much depth can be bad for players. We have a lot of players that can do what Burmi can, and more efficiently since they are playing and he isn't. I have no problem with him as a player, there are just players I think add more than he does. He is a good player and on another team with weaker depth he would be playing. Hopefully a deal can get done, getting a asset for him would be great but I imagine he gets claimed or we just get a nobody AHL player. Preferably a center since Utica is kinda hurting for center depth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quantum Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 If the Canucks can move him for a C+ defensive prospect, probably a win and the best they can do. Good chance that Burmistrov gets waived sooner rather than later. He'll also have more value if he clears waivers as opposed to if he doesn't, honestly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 9 minutes ago, Quantum said: If the Canucks can move him for a C+ defensive prospect, probably a win and the best they can do. Good chance that Burmistrov gets waived sooner rather than later. He'll also have more value if he clears waivers as opposed to if he doesn't, honestly. Pedan cleared waivers, and he (pretty much) returned Pouliot. That would be phenomenal of Burmistrov could bring back that type of return. (I doubt it though) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NuckForReal!!! Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 1 hour ago, Hutton Wink said: Our 4th back from the Pedan trade... orrrrr would that be too ballsy? It's old man Rutherford, he's probably forgotten by now. Exactly what i was thinking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NuckForReal!!! Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 1 hour ago, Hutton Wink said: Our 4th back from the Pedan trade... orrrrr would that be too ballsy? It's old man Rutherford, he's probably forgotten by now. Exactly what i was thinking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apple Juice Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 Baertschi out 4-6 weeks would most likely give Burmistrov a shot? I know Goldobin is slated to slot in but Goldobin can be sent back to the AHL without waivers so Burmi should be fine to slot in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHitman Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 Burmistrov for Reinhart one for one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nicklas Bo Hunter Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 30 minutes ago, TheHitman said: Burmistrov for Reinhart one for one Lol must mea max Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crabcakes Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 7 hours ago, Yotes said: This smells like other recent players available this year. Spread the word wait a day or two then put on waivers. I would be thrilled if we could get something back for him, but not going to hold my breath on that. Like somebody's Jordan Subban...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 5 hours ago, Hutton Wink said: You mean, as opposed to Botching up rumours and Patersoning speculation based on nothing just to Pratt up the gossip? yup Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 4 hours ago, erkayloomeh said: Why do teams waive players prior to trading them? Why wouldn't a team just pluck him off waivers instead of trading for him? Thanks in advance because they can just move them to their AHL affiliate and then call up as needed. Someone could grab up Burmy before, but then that means you have to keep him on the 23 man roster vs. leave him in the AHL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Me_ Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 I wonder what Dal Colle is worth... Dal Colle went 1/5 '14; Virtanen went 1/6 '14. Oshawa Generals, has a pretty good shot, the only top ten of his draft without any NHL experience. Griffin Reinhart sounds interesting... 1/4 '12; Gaunce went 1/26 '12. 6'04" 212lbs; could be good... Pile 'em up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 shop hard Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 Canucks would be better off trading Gagner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 24 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said: Canucks would be better off trading Gagner. he is invisible thats for sure. try to send him back to columbus! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 Just now, Yotes said: he is invisible thats for sure. try to send him back to columbus! Hutton, a 2nd, and Gagner for Boone Jenner? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Monahan Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 6 hours ago, darkpoet said: How about Edler/Burmi to Toronto for Michael Paliotta I know Dale Tallon's moist for Guddy but I don't like losing his toughness. Our team is too soft now. Edler would allow Toronto to dump Polak, whom everyone over there hates, and we move on from one more aging player that's left over from 2011. https://editorinleaf.com/2017/09/16/toronto-maple-leafs-michael-paliotta/http://marlies.ca/players/6002Michael Paliotta 6'3" 207 lbs Defense R/H shot 24 years old 70th overall pick by the Hawks in 2011. Why trade one of our best players for a guy on an AHL deal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted December 12, 2017 Share Posted December 12, 2017 33 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said: Canucks would be better off trading Gagner. To who, and for what? Isn’t Gagner kind of worth only another team’s crappy contract? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.