• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      All Threads Must Contain Tags!   07/25/2017

      ALL THREADS MUST CONTAIN TAGS   All threads in this forum must contain tags prefixed to topic titles. The purpose of the tags is to eliminate confusion in recent threads lists, and to create an organized and consistent environment. Moderators may immediately lock and thread that does not contain tags.    Tags must be placed at the start of your thread title, following this exact formatting:    [Tag] Thread Title   Here are some of the most used popular tags:    [Proposal]
      A trade, or trades, for next season, or even the off-season.
      [Off-Season]
      FA signings, off-season trades for RFA's, UFA's rights etc...
      [Value Of]
      (A question regarding a players worth, whether from another team, or the Canucks)
      [Speculation] Posting a rumor (with a source of course), but providing why it could be possible for the Canucks to land that player.   [Discussion]
      Thoughts on team trading strategy and composition.   Please feel free to create your own tag if none of these suit your thread.   
Sign in to follow this  
bombbret

[Value Of] Boone Jenner

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, NuckForReal!!! said:

I have a feeling he would cost a lot but if we could get him for hutton and goldobin, that would be a deal you would make.

 ya  i like goldobin  id rather offer up someone else hutton and lockwood  

 

 would also free up sutter to be trade bait at deadline for a first and d prospect 

trade tanev for 1d prospect

edler for 1st 

vanek for 2nd   our center depth would be crazy next yr 

marky to isles for a 2nd 

trade a bunch pics for1st overall  draft that swede dman  frachise dahlen

 

       kane petersson boeser

       dahlin bo eriksson 

      baertchi jenner virtanen 

     gagner gaunce gokdobin 

      lind/gax/goldo

 

     delzotto guddy

     juolevi tryamkin

     pouliot dahlen

 

 nilsson 

demko 

 

 team has grit speed and offense 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, NuckForReal!!! said:

I have a feeling he would cost a lot but if we could get him for hutton and goldobin, that would be a deal you would make.

I like this package offer, maybe try and get them to take gagner somehow, he did good with them, but not doing it here

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, NuckForReal!!! said:

I have a feeling he would cost a lot but if we could get him for hutton and goldobin, that would be a deal you would make.

But I doubt the Jackets would make that deal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, higgyfan said:

But I doubt the Jackets would make that deal.

they would likely want baertschi in return

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, canuktravella said:

 ya  i like goldobin  id rather offer up someone else hutton and lockwood  

 

 would also free up sutter to be trade bait at deadline for a first and d prospect 

trade tanev for 1d prospect

edler for 1st 

vanek for 2nd   our center depth would be crazy next yr 

marky to isles for a 2nd 

trade a bunch pics for1st overall  draft that swede dman  frachise dahlen

 

       kane petersson boeser

       dahlin bo eriksson 

      baertchi jenner virtanen 

     gagner gaunce gokdobin 

      lind/gax/goldo

 

     delzotto guddy

     juolevi tryamkin

     pouliot dahlen

 

 nilsson 

demko 

 

 team has grit speed and offense 

By the time Tryamkin comes back (if he does)there is absolutely no way Dahlin is on our bottom pairing. Also it's Dahlin that plays defense. Dahlen is our forward prospect

 

Also the idea that someone is going to trade us the first overall pick to acquire Dahlin is laughable. He's touted to be the best defensemen since Karlsson. There is absolutely no way any team trades that. Nvm the idea they are going to give it up for a bunch of picks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, canuktravella said:

 ya  i like goldobin  id rather offer up someone else hutton and lockwood  

 

 would also free up sutter to be trade bait at deadline for a first and d prospect 

trade tanev for 1d prospect

edler for 1st 

vanek for 2nd   our center depth would be crazy next yr 

marky to isles for a 2nd 

trade a bunch pics for1st overall  draft that swede dman  frachise dahlen

 

       kane petersson boeser

       dahlin bo eriksson 

      baertchi jenner virtanen 

     gagner gaunce gokdobin 

      lind/gax/goldo

 

     delzotto guddy

     juolevi tryamkin

     pouliot dahlen

 

 nilsson 

demko 

 

 team has grit speed and offense 

You forgot about Gaudette. Marky is our guy till Demko arrives, I just want nillson to have really good numbers so we can max out his value. I think Guddy is gone at the TDL maybe Sutter or that might be A draft day type trade. Throw in Vanek and that is a lot of players to snag us high picks and prospects.  Just look at the last couple of TDL A guy like Vanek or Tanman in Vanek's case A 1st C prospect. Tanman 1st ++ Nillson. Maybe we add AQ bit but if he gets his game going, having A healthy D and PK should help. Sutter is so easily worth A first if we retain A bit. He gets crapped on all the time not sure why, but he is one of the best 3rd/2nd line centres in the league. Hutton needs to go asap for anything.. 

 

Let me just say if we are close to A playoff spot once we get healthy and are close at the TDL I say only trades would be Guddy if he hasn't been dealt sooner. I think he will test the

market and get way overpaid. Maybe Vanek If it is A decent 1st. Nillson dido. The way the goalie market is this year and it will probably get worse as the season drags on. It seems especially in the East every team needs A goalie in some capacity If Nillson starts to play like he before his last 3 games. A ton of teams will be at least curious. Ironically Murrey is starting to look like the fluke lol

Anyways just my thoughts. I trust in whatever plan JB has in placE. MERRY CHRISTMAS.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Yotes said:

they would likely want baertschi in return

If Jenner also plays LW as well as C, this trade may be a wash.

 

LW seems to be the Jacket's weakest position.  Canucks LW mostly aging vets, but for Goldy (who is still trying to make the team) Granny and Gaunce.  With Baer and Vanek gone, there would be 2 LW spots to be filled next year.  Maybe Goldy, Dahlen or UFA can fill Baer's or Vanek' spot, but that's a very big leap for them.

 

With the possibility of Gaudette joining the club in the near future, JB may decide to stay the course; especially if it looks like Pettersson will be ready within the next couple of years.  If he thinks he can pick up a UFA (Kane), he might try to move Baer, with the idea that the 2nd or 3RW could be Granny (if Dahlen and Goldy aren't ready. 

 

I think Baer for Gaudette would be a decent 'hockey trade'.  Preferably JB would have a good plan to replace Baer on the 1st line next season.  Both players are due for new contracts, but it is a non-issue as they are both RFAs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2017-12-16 at 12:22 PM, higgyfan said:

If Jenner also plays LW as well as C, this trade may be a wash.

 

LW seems to be the Jacket's weakest position.  Canucks LW mostly aging vets, but for Goldy (who is still trying to make the team) Granny and Gaunce.  With Baer and Vanek gone, there would be 2 LW spots to be filled next year.  Maybe Goldy, Dahlen or UFA can fill Baer's or Vanek' spot, but that's a very big leap for them.

 

With the possibility of Gaudette joining the club in the near future, JB may decide to stay the course; especially if it looks like Pettersson will be ready within the next couple of years.  If he thinks he can pick up a UFA (Kane), he might try to move Baer, with the idea that the 2nd or 3RW could be Granny (if Dahlen and Goldy aren't ready. 

 

I think Baer for Gaudette would be a decent 'hockey trade'.  Preferably JB would have a good plan to replace Baer on the 1st line next season.  Both players are due for new contracts, but it is a non-issue as they are both RFAs.

baer for gaudette seems like a inhouse trade lol  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.