-Vintage Canuck- Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckylager Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 Chicago eh. Always getting shiny new toys... Man I hate those guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 wow what a great deal for the Hawks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRAZY_4_NAZZY Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 If the Duke can figure it out, the Hawks just robbed Arizona blind. Man Duclair's value really really dropped Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 4 minutes ago, luckylager said: Chicago eh. Clearly, Duclair is the sweetener. The main piece of this deal is CHI getting Clendening back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 Clendening back to Chicago - via Vancouver, Pittsburgh, Edmonton, New York Rangers, Arizona. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 Just now, mll said: Clendening back to Chicago - via Vancouver, Pittsburgh, Edmonton, New York Rangers, Arizona. CHI now has Forsling and Clendening!! They clearly won that trade. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Down by the River Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 Just now, mll said: Clendening back to Chicago - via Vancouver, Pittsburgh, Edmonton, New York Rangers, Arizona. Must have flown with United. But jeeze, how many teams out there just love bailing out the Hawks? Panik was, from what I remember, picked up on waivers from TO. He's not going to have the same success without the support he got from Toews. Chicago gets to clear two contracts for one and gets the far better player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nuxfanabroad Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 League sorts this crap out to promote their major markets. NOT an honest league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 good trade for Chicago. Didnt give up much, guess Benning was content with our lackluster scoring we have and didnt want to send some plugs arizonas way. Cant take all the reclamation projects on though I guess... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 Just now, Nuxfanabroad said: League sorts this crap out to promote their major markets. NOT an honest league. I dunno... Chayka's had a history of making moves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhippy Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 Kinda of ridiculous how lopsided this trade is. Panik and Clendenning have been on waivers. Hawks just net an amazing return for...well parts. Panik has had a decent couple fo seasons in Chicago but man... And just burns me that Clendenning AND Forsling are now back in Chicago Did I make it before people complain about Benning's asset management or how we were totally in on Duke if they were in charge? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 I like Duclair I like Chicago I like Duclair in Chicago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 1 minute ago, Warhippy said: Kinda of ridiculous how lopsided this trade is. Panik and Clendenning have been on waivers. Hawks just net an amazing return for...well parts. Panik has had a decent couple fo seasons in Chicago but man... And just burns me that Clendenning AND Forsling are now back in Chicago Did I make it before people complain about Benning's asset management or how we were totally in on Duke if they were in charge? And Chicago dumps Paniks 2.8m also. If Benning didnt think Duclair was an upgrade for our team maybe there is good reason he is in lame duck GM status. Unlikely he is gone as GM but for that type of return we should have been all over that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 2 minutes ago, Warhippy said: Kinda of ridiculous how lopsided this trade is. Panik and Clendenning have been on waivers. Hawks just net an amazing return for...well parts. Panik has had a decent couple fo seasons in Chicago but man... And just burns me that Clendenning AND Forsling are now back in Chicago Did I make it before people complain about Benning's asset management or how we were totally in on Duke if they were in charge? Chicago saw value in Panik - they signed him last May to a 2 x 2.8M deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boudrias Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 Just now, Warhippy said: Kinda of ridiculous how lopsided this trade is. Panik and Clendenning have been on waivers. Hawks just net an amazing return for...well parts. Panik has had a decent couple fo seasons in Chicago but man... And just burns me that Clendenning AND Forsling are now back in Chicago Did I make it before people complain about Benning's asset management or how we were totally in on Duke if they were in charge? Clendenning has been to CHI-VAN-PITT-NYR-ARI-CHI . What exactly do you think we missed? I can agree about Forsling but Benning had to decide how many midgets he would have on the blueline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 Each team gets back former picks who are likely career AHLers. Plus Blackhawks trade a guy they got off waivers for another project player who's production has slipped. I think the Hawks win this one. At least if Duclair isn't scoring he can fill a bottom 6 tole. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 Bowman called Bettman. Things happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 3 minutes ago, Boudrias said: Clendenning has been to CHI-VAN-PITT-NYR-ARI-CHI . What exactly do you think we missed? I can agree about Forsling but Benning had to decide how many midgets he would have on the blueline. Only in Vancouver do fans still complain about a minor trade for years. Forsling and Clendening are not an upgrade on this team right now at all. There's a reason why Forsling is playing on Chicago's bottom pair. Move on people. There will be other Forsling level players to be had in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted January 10, 2018 Share Posted January 10, 2018 1 minute ago, DeNiro said: Only in Vancouver do fans still complain about a minor trade for years. Forsling and Clendening are not an upgrade on this team right now at all. There's a reason why Forsling is playing on Chicago's bottom pair. Move on people. There will be other Forsling level players to be had in the future. 13pts in 37 games at age 21 for a D man. I would be thrilled to have him on our team!! Seems like nothing but potential upside. That was a knee jerk stupid trade, but yes it is in the past. Loved Forsling at the WJC to only see him gone moments later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.