Toyotasfan

Yes or no to the Sedin’s next year?

Rate this topic

Yes or No to 1 more year of the Sedins  

415 members have voted

This poll is closed to new votes
  1. 1. Do you want the Sedin’s next year?

    • Yes - 1 more year
      206
    • No - time to retire
      199

  • Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
  • Poll closed on 06/27/2018 at 07:00 AM

Recommended Posts

I wouldn't be upset at all if they re-signed for good value for one year, but I hope they call it.  If they do retire, we will certainly have even less offense until we replace that output.  I have the utmost most love and respect for the Sedins, they are great players and classy dudes.  If they are planning on signing somewhere else, I'd rather have them here until they are ready to retire.  Canucks for life. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If they're willing to go cheap enough, I'd like to try another year. They're clearly still capable 2nd liners.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's the cap threshold.  The numbers going around are minimum 5M each.  

 

They have an agent - CAA represents the likes of Toews, Kane, Crosby, Malkin etc it's a huge agency.  They'll negotiate market value - under doesn't show well for future or current clients.  It's also the Canucks that wants them back.  Thornton got 8M after a 50pt season.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, oldnews said:

it's not as simple as a yes or no at this point.

No if we get a 2nd or good prospect for Vanek, sign Evander Kane 1st, Juolevi makes it and Loui finishes with 50 points? Yes if we can't replace their offence?  who knows. I'm torn, there's good arguments for both sides of it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One year for $2.5 million each, and they'd be third liners, on the 2nd PP unit. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Nuxfanabroad said:

Sedinsy announces he wants to change his number to #32..no one can understand it?

I would have assumed it was to honor Dale Weise.

  • Hydration 2
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. They Can still contribute. One here deals only though. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Jimmy McGill said:

No if we get a 2nd or good prospect for Vanek, sign Evander Kane 1st, Juolevi makes it and Loui finishes with 50 points? Yes if we can't replace their offence?  who knows. I'm torn, there's good arguments for both sides of it.

Yes, but rent them to Anaheim first, for Sam Steel (Sedins be willing).

 

Let them hoist the Cup - and bring it to Vancouver when it's their chance.

Leave it with Horvat for the night - let his hunger grow.

 

Come back next year and score 50 pts on our 3rd line again.  Jake will be ready for their wing by then.  Get him 20 goals in the process.

  • Hydration 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we wait and decide about the trade deadline...............

Then if it is unclear, wait until Draft day, and see who we get

Then think about it some more until July 1st

If we sign Tavares then no we don't sign them

If we don't, invite them to training camp

Evaluate the talent that is in camp

If the talent is good enough to honestly play in the NHL, then no

If the talent has still not matured, then sign them

 

Pretty simple actually!

 

In saying all that, they have only scored 16 goals between the 2 of them......not a lot of offense really!

Edited by janisahockeynut

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.