• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.
JamesBlondage

Rumour - Larry Brooks - Max Domi

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, City-in-state-of-emergency said:

Yikes checked his DB and that's a major drop in production.... what happened? 

I was wondering the same thing. Anyone know his injury history? Has he been having concussion problems? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I always wanted him as a canuck. He fits the mold perfect. Good combo of skill and grit. Is there a trade based around a defensemen to be made? I feel like other team can offer more then us.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, 73 Percent said:

The problem is that Arizona is in eternal rebuild mode.  I'd love to acquire domi but it has to make sense for us. They're not going to take granlund and a second or vanek in a deal. They'll want a pick or a young guy.

Goldobin + Granlund? 

  • Hydration 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Domi could be our solution to a core LW player in the future, perhaps more so than Baertschi. (On top of Dahlen)

 

We could always offer Goldobin and an add. I think at this point Granlund could be a fit on their roster. He could take Domi's spot on their third line. He is a responsible defensive player, could flourish with different line mates and a better opportunity than he is getting with us beside Sutter. 


Maybe something like Goldobin, Granlund and a 3rd?


But honestly, this seems like more of a deadline thing. If for example we end up getting Zadina or Svech from the draft, then we would hypothetically have our top 6 wingers in Boeser, Dahlen, 2018 pick, Goldobin, Lind, Gadjovich.

Edited by Brobidus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In the immortal words of Daniel Bryan... "YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES! YES!!!!!"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, aGENT said:

Goldobin + Granlund? 

I really like granlund, and that trade seems fair. Goldobin still has potential to be a top 6 and granlund would help them out defensively. I wonder... I want Domi...

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would consider something around Goldy or Hutton. There has to be some red flags with Domo now? Numbers this year are horrible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, aGENT said:

Goldobin + Granlund? 

I would do it for sure. I'm not sure that's what Arizona is looking for though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, rekker said:

I would consider something around Goldy or Hutton. There has to be some red flags with Domo now? Numbers this year are horrible.

Nobody reaches their potential on the Coyotes. I believe it is more the team/organization than the player and I believe Domi would flourish on another team. I suspect the asking price is still going to be relatively high and IMO we would have to make a stronger offer than what has been indicated so far in this thread. Maybe a Domi and 4th for Baertschi, Hutton and a 3rd.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Rick Blight said:

Nobody reaches their potential on the Coyotes. I believe it is more the team/organization than the player and I believe Domi would flourish on another team. I suspect the asking price is still going to be relatively high and IMO we would have to make a stronger offer than what has been indicated so far in this thread. Maybe a Domi and 4th for Baertschi, Hutton and a 3rd.

Yeah thats more like it, 3 pieces for sure if none are 1st rate. Baer hutton and pick is exactly what I was thinking. Higher pick if granny is swapped for baer and we resign baer this summer. 

 

Re unite Bo and Domi!  :D I am 100% for this been saying for 3 years to a co worker we ahould go after Domi. I feel like Bubbles in a shed full of kitties and a bottle of Bald pussy tequilla and guitar in my arms. " Bo and Domi" ( replacing Liquor and *hores...) Greasy old cheese burgers.. 

  • Hydration 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Baertschi and hutton for Domi. Picks balance it out. That's super fair, and helps both teams.

 

I say in the offseason, we draft the best Dman we can. (Of course, best player available. But if two guys are even, go with the Dman) And then go make a big splash in free agency with a guy like Evander Kane. When that guy gets going, he can be a force. And he won't command super high money either.

 

Kane - Petterson - Boeser

Domi - Horvat - Virtanen

 

That's the Canucks core and top 6 for years to come. That's a mean, athletic, speedy, team, with a bunch of dudes with a whole lot of heart. I want that core.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is wrong with Domi?

 

What is wrong with Arizona...it's the entire team.  Nobody comes to realize their potential there and eventually just stop caring.  Watch most of the traded youth in Arizona start shining.  Domi anywhere else becomes a 50-60 point guy IMO

 

Who is our best analytics guy?  Send him over with a calculator for Chayka and bring Domi over

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.