aGENT Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 I'd be sure game for moving and re-signing Vanek Update: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 I'd love the trade and re-sign, though I'm sure it's just his agent keeping options open. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gerry35 Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 I'm all for trading him and then resigning him again in the summer, he has been a great signing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 BOS wants Hutton? Pick up the phone Benning! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goalie13 Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 I wonder if admitting that he would re-sign in Vancouver again would diminish his trade value as it would almost guarantee he would only be around as a rental. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanuckinEdm Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 1 minute ago, goalie13 said: I wonder if admitting that he would re-sign in Vancouver again would diminish his trade value as it would almost guarantee he would only be around as a rental. for a top end contender i don't think so, especially if Van eats 50% cap for the remaining year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted February 7, 2018 Author Share Posted February 7, 2018 3 minutes ago, goalie13 said: I wonder if admitting that he would re-sign in Vancouver again would diminish his trade value as it would almost guarantee he would only be around as a rental. I think most teams he'd be going to would prefer and expect a rental. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goalie13 Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 1 minute ago, CanuckinEdm said: for a top end contender i don't think so, especially if Van eats 50% cap for the remaining year. Can they even do that? They are retaining on Luongo and Hansen right now. I thought the limit was two? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 ZACKALLY what should happen, as has been said. Cash in your chips, then re-sign if need be later. Mid-round pick is fine, it gives opportunity for Goldy or another yute to come in and gain experience. Same goes for moving a dman like Hutton, so we can bring up a Holm, Sautner, etc. -- roster spots are one of the main things we need to consider right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goalie13 Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Just now, aGENT said: I think most teams he'd be going to would prefer and expect a rental. But it closes the door on the possibility of an extension. I always figured it's better to keep the cards close to the chest in these cases. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 6 minutes ago, NUCKER67 said: BOS wants Hutton? Pick up the phone Benning! Just please no Hutton-for-Spooner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted February 7, 2018 Author Share Posted February 7, 2018 1 minute ago, goalie13 said: Can they even do that? They are retaining on Luongo and Hansen right now. I thought the limit was two? Three. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goalie13 Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Just now, aGENT said: Three. My mistake. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted February 7, 2018 Author Share Posted February 7, 2018 Just now, goalie13 said: But it closes the door on the possibility of an extension. I always figured it's better to keep the cards close to the chest in these cases. His agent isn't closing anything. They said they be open to anything including possibly be moved and re-signing. The other team (or all 29 other teams) would all have the ability to try to woo him July 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 It's the Hutton rumor I find more interesting than Vanek. I'm really curious what kind of return JB could get for Hutton, or is there a potential package deal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 6 minutes ago, goalie13 said: But it closes the door on the possibility of an extension. I always figured it's better to keep the cards close to the chest in these cases. The Rangers are doing the same with Nash. They see the TDL as an opportunity to get assets for him but they are apparently interested in bringing him back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SID.IS.SID.ME.IS.ME Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 18 minutes ago, aGENT said: I'd be sure game for moving and re-signing Vanek I’d be game for making it an annual tradition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIC_CITY Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 19 minutes ago, Hutton Wink said: Just please no Hutton-for-Spooner. I would gladly make that trade. 22 points in 31 games works out to 58 points over an 82 game season. He'd be an upgrade on most of our forwards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 13 minutes ago, SID.IS.SID.ME.IS.ME said: I’d be game for making it an annual tradition. The Leafs have an annual tradition with Roman Polak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DIBdaQUIB Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 32 minutes ago, NUCKER67 said: BOS wants Hutton? Pick up the phone Benning! I doubt they are still interested after his performance last night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.