• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.
CRAZY_4_NAZZY

[Report] Canucks wishlist at trade deadline: A physical forward

Recommended Posts

 

Not a secret that is what we need, but interesting that he chose to name that one over some other needs, such as maybe some defence prospects, or a scoring forward.

 

Some interesting names on some common trade bait lists are Evander Kane, Patrick Maroon that fit that mould, but considering that the Canucks won't want to pay a premium and will likely want younger players, will be interesting who else they could be referring to.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, CRAZY_4_NAZZY said:

 

Not a secret that is what we need, but interesting that he chose to name that one over some other needs, such as maybe some defence prospects, or a scoring forward.

 

Some interesting names on some common trade bait lists are Evander Kane, Patrick Maroon that fit that mould, but considering that the Canucks won't want to pay a premium and will likely want younger players, will be interesting who else they could be referring to.

 

 

Benning said as much on HNIC.  I think it's about replacing Dorsett and there's doubt about Archibald's ability.  i don't think it's something to be alarmed about.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, naslundfan921 said:

Domi matches the description and fits the relative age range. Cost might be a little too high though

Plz Benning plz.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Lulover88 said:

We need to rebuild ..    That means selling , not buying ..    If they are actually gonna get a player , he better be on the young side 

We'll sell, don't worry.

I don't think he's looking for a rental.

This is a longer term acquisition.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, naslundfan921 said:

Domi matches the description and fits the relative age range. Cost might be a little too high though

Yeah I’m almost positive Benning was thinking if Domi when he was describing the player he wants. Wouldn’t be surprised if he’s aggressively pursuing 

  • Hydration 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, RetroCanuck said:

Tanev to Toronto for Liljegrin+Martin+2nd

 

Let Virtanen and Gadj develop into the tough power forwards we need. Maybe draft Tkatchuk...

:lol::lol: you're funny. Why in the world would Toronto make such an overpayment. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, naslundfan921 said:

Domi matches the description and fits the relative age range. Cost might be a little too high though

This is exactly what I thought when I heard JB say that earlier. Domi's name immediately came to mind. 

 

But we need 2 or 3 more players like that, not just 1. 

 

Clearly Virtanen hasn't turned out to be what JB wished he would. This goes to tell how long draft and development takes. Sometimes ppl on CDC think we draft a player and he's going to be a difference maker in a year. Really it takes 5 years for the most part. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, oldnews said:

Gagner for Kassian.

 

Zing.

I'd do that trade got gonna lie.

  • Hydration 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Odd. said:

I'd do that trade got gonna lie.

Kassian is a hair brain.  Good riddance.  You have a short memory Sir

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, naslundfan921 said:

Domi matches the description and fits the relative age range. Cost might be a little too high though

Domi (as good as he is) doesn't really match the description. He's 5-10 and under 200 lbs. He plays bigger than he is but I don't that's the type of player Benning is referring to. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Hydration 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Iggynucks said:

Domi (as good as he is) doesn't really match the description. He's 5-10 and under 200 lbs. He plays bigger than he is but I don't that's the type of player Benning is referring to. 

maybe he was hinting he's gonna take another run at lucic :P

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.