• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.
Rush17

[Rumour] Tampa and Toronto interested in Chris Tanev, low offers so far

Recommended Posts

Hopefully if we’re out of it trade deadline Tanev has been healthy all year and we can find a great deal for him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, flickyoursedin said:

Hopefully if we’re out of it trade deadline Tanev has been healthy all year and we can find a great deal for him.

In theory that could be where they get more value for him, I could totally see GMs paying more at the deadline then now for Tanev.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now that Hughes or Juolevi might make the team I’m really glad that we kept Tanev. 

 

If we’re out of the playoff run by trade deadline we should definitely revisit this though. It’d be so awesome to have two first round picks in next year’s draft for all of us favs taking it in live at Rogers Arena. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, Canuck Drogo said:

Now that Hughes or Juolevi might make the team I’m really glad that we kept Tanev. 

 

If we’re out of the playoff run by trade deadline we should definitely revisit this though. It’d be so awesome to have two first round picks in next year’s draft for all of us favs taking it in live at Rogers Arena. 

That’s what I’m thinking! It would be a wild draft if we moved some vets and had another couple 1rst and 2nd rounders. I’d be pretty interested in going if we had multiple picks in the first round.

  • Hydration 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
21 hours ago, Canuck Drogo said:

Now that Hughes or Juolevi might make the team I’m really glad that we kept Tanev. 

 

If we’re out of the playoff run by trade deadline we should definitely revisit this though. It’d be so awesome to have two first round picks in next year’s draft for all of us favs taking it in live at Rogers Arena. 

Three 1st rounders if you trade Edler too.

then trade your highest two of the three picks for the 1OA.

 

Draft Jack Hughes.

 

If push comes to shove, what is best? Three firsts or the 1OA?

Edited by Me_
  • Hydration 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.