• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.
Sugar baby watermelon

[Speculation] Flyers Neuvirth out with injury, Nilsson possible trade replacement

Recommended Posts

https://www.cbssports.com/fantasy/hockey/news/flyers-michal-neuvirth-suffers-lower-body-malady/

Both Philly goalies are out with injuries, Neuvirth just went down with an injury and they need a capable replacement to stay in the playoff race.  Apparently Hextall turned down a Mrazek deal for a 3rd rounder from Detroit earlier and now the price will only go up.  Could Nilsson be that replacement?   Who comes back from Philly?

Screenshot_20180218-114334.jpg

Edited by Sugar baby watermelon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just more speculation from people that think other GMs are lining up to give Benning draft picks for our players, but the only think getting in the away is GMJB's stubbornness.  Getting their hopes up just fuels more whining and complaining when the Canucks don't go into the next draft with 20+ picks.

  • Thanks 1
  • Hydration 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, King Heffy said:

Just as long as Demko isn't called up this year.  Much rather see him be part of a long playoff run in Utica instead of getting shelled here.

Agreed.  Although I think the best of both worlds has Demko playing 2-3 games this year while being a part of a long playoff run.  If it's one or the other I'd prefer Demko stay for the playoff run.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Prefer to keep him just so they arent forced to bring up Demko. Sure maybe give him a few games at the end, but you dont want to throw him into the fire 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im happy to bring up Demko, so long that he gets some games.

 

I dont think it would break him.  Hes ready for the next level imo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Desperate times, desperate measures.

 

PHI

Nilsson

 

VAN

1st '18

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, 70seven said:

Im happy to bring up Demko, so long that he gets some games.

 

I dont think it would break him.  Hes ready for the next level imo.

Keep in mind our defense is likely to be much worse after the deadline, with possible Tanev and Gudbranson trades.  Our goalies are likely to get shelled.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, King Heffy said:

Keep in mind our defense is likely to be much worse after the deadline, with possible Tanev and Gudbranson trades.  Our goalies are likely to get shelled.

Same old story for him in the A

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Send them Markstrom! I had a dream once Markstrom was philly's netminder! its meant to be!!!!

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Me_ said:

Desperate times, desperate measures.

 

PHI

Nilsson Markstrom

 

VAN

1st '18

Fixed that for ya :D

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, 70seven said:

Gudbranson + Nilsson

for 

Laughton + 2nd + 4th

Noooo we must keep Gudbranson! so we can trade Tanev :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

People actually think we're getting a 1st for Nilsson?

 

Hope it's just trolling.

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.