• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.
Sign in to follow this  
Adarsh Sant

[Trade] DET trade G Petr Mrazek to PHI

Recommended Posts

So it begins!

 

The first significant domino falls.

Edited by Rush17

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The stove is hot, ladies and gentlemen.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They settled on a 4th. Good poker move by Hextall. :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, captainhorvat said:

Glad Ken Holland wont be our GM next season...

Yeah that feels really low for a goaltender of his caliber. Not even a prospect included.

  • Like 1
  • Hydration 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, The Great Canucks said:

What are the conditions on the picks?

Yeah, hard to judge the trade without knowing. 

 

EDIT: just read (unconfirmed tweet) that Detroit might be retaining 50% salary. 

 

EDIT: looks confirmed Detroit retains 

 

Alos now tweets (unconfirmed) saying the conditionals are that the 4th becomes a 3rd depending on playoff performance and the 3rd becomes a 2nd if Mrazek is extended. Unconfirmed but that’s way more solid return if true.

 

EDIT: official conditions:

 

EDIT: so basically a very good chance Detroit only gets a 4th rounder out of this when all’s said and done.

Edited by SID.IS.SID.ME.IS.ME
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Crazy thing is that this guy was in talks for the Vezina 2 seasons ago. 

  • Hydration 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn

 

I'd have taken a conditional 3rd and conditional 4th for Nilsson. 

 

I mean, really. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Rush17 said:

Yeah that feels really low for a goaltender of his caliber. Not even a prospect included.

I would have thought that a 4th would have been the return on Nilsson. Does anyone else need a backup?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, captainhorvat said:

Glad Ken Holland wont be our GM next season...

Seems like there is some kind of character issue with him they dont like?

 

Very odd to trade the younger, more controlable goalie when your a rebuilding team.

 

Decent return though, makes me want to see us trade Nilsson at next TDL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Rush17 said:

Yeah that feels really low for a goaltender of his caliber. Not even a prospect included.

Im thinkn hes worth at least a 2nd but would like to know what the conditions are.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, luckylager said:

Damn

 

I'd have taken a conditional 3rd and conditional 4th for Nilsson. 

 

I mean, really. 

Would you trade Mrazek for Nilsson straight up if you were Detroit?

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jimmy McGill said:

I would have thought that a 4th would have been the return on Nilsson. Does anyone else need a backup?

3rd and a 4th, Jimmy.

Sure Mraz had a good season once. He's not that much better than Nilsson. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, King Heffy said:

Would you trade Mrazek for Nilsson straight up if you were Detroit?

Hahaha

 

No.

 

 

Nilsson and a 4th

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Jimmy McGill said:

I would have thought that a 4th would have been the return on Nilsson. Does anyone else need a backup?

Tampa bay is one big Vasilevsky injury away from having thr parade route on hold till next season....i think Nilsson would be a good fit for them.

 

 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this guy having a really bad season or something? I thought he was pretty good and potentially Wings future #1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.