Hairy Kneel Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 Liligren straight up for Tanman one's for the playoffs one's for the future Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackalman Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 7 minutes ago, Hairy Kneel said: Liligren straight up for Tanman one's for the playoffs one's for the future I’m my opinion, Toronto would have to do better than that. Add there first, or maybe a second this year and next. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
250Integra Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 14 hours ago, Hutton Wink said: What 37-year-old rentals are available this year? Maybe they'll sign Jarome Iginla Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billabong Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 3 hours ago, Jackalman said: I’m my opinion, Toronto would have to do better than that. Add there first, or maybe a second this year and next. You want a team to spend 2 first round picks on a player who is on pace to play 50-55 games for the 2nd consecutive year? Sounds great but I wouldn’t pay that for tanev if I were them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smokes Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 Van Riemsdyk for Eriksson and a second Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexandre Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 6 hours ago, Hutton Wink said: That's the thing -- trades have to make sense for both sides. We aren't here to do them any favours, undoubtedly they could find a contender to take JVR and put him to good use. Indeed, trade him FIRST, then they may have some assets to flip that we want in return. That way it also doesn't look like they're giving up a big portion of their own future assets (even though their "rebuild is done"). So are they giving any substance, like evidence of actual conversations taking place and what's being considered as on the table, or is it pure morning-talk conjecture and speculation? Twitterverse appears silent. That is actually a good idea. However, it could be more difficult for Lou to make two trades to get Tanev and so is just trying to make a deal with Benning. The only regular that I basically pay attention to is Auld. No, it was one of their guests yesterday. I think it was Farhan Lalji, who said that the Leaves were pushing hard for Tanev. I wish I could find AM 650's archives so I don't have to rely or depend on my memory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EternalCanuckFan Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 JVR for Tanev would be OK but there would have to be more for the Canucks. JVR is a good player and an upgrade at LW but he's already 28 and is a UFA this summer. There could be a deal but I would expect the Canucks to push for more and I'm not sure what the Leafs would want to offer in addition to JVR. Kapanen? Liljegren? A few high picks? JVR could help the Canucks stay competitive but unless the Leafs add pieces that help the Canucks in the future also, I can't see a deal being made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackalman Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 3 hours ago, billabong said: You want a team to spend 2 first round picks on a player who is on pace to play 50-55 games for the 2nd consecutive year? Sounds great but I wouldn’t pay that for tanev if I were them Yes. Or a first and 2 seconds. If they don’t want to pay it, too bad for them. We Keep tanev and see what someone will pay at the draft or next tdd. Or trade him somewhere else. I’m not interested in doing Toronto any favours. Would like to get liljegren though. But he is not a sure thing. Tanev is. He is injury prone but you know what he is, and he is exactly what Toronto needs. So pay up, or #%$& off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 he's going to the NYR in a Nash deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
captainhorvat Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 On 21/02/2018 at 2:15 PM, N7Nucks said: JVR for Tanev straight up Toronto does this deal in a heartbeat but from our side it doesnt make sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 Just now, captainhorvat said: Toronto does this deal in a heartbeat but from our side it doesnt make sense. Yeah I said that literally in my next comment. Just made the post from a value stand point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 32 minutes ago, oldnews said: he's going to the NYR in a Nash deal 5 years older, 10 less points, and an extra $2.8mil. The #leafmodel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldnews Posted February 22, 2018 Share Posted February 22, 2018 3 minutes ago, Hutton Wink said: 5 years older, 10 less points, and an extra $2.8mil. The #leafmodel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Lock Posted February 23, 2018 Share Posted February 23, 2018 On 2/21/2018 at 2:23 PM, N7Nucks said: Yeah it doesn't make much sense for us to make this deal, as it would just give us a forward asset in his prime kinda wasting away on a rebuilding team. The forward version of Tanev. Lol. Not to mention van Riemsdyk's contract expires this season whereas Tanev's is longer term, so we're taking more of the risk in the end in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.