MikeyBoy44 Posted April 21, 2018 Share Posted April 21, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AV. Posted April 21, 2018 Share Posted April 21, 2018 Only issues deterring this league at the moment are because of 1. retention and 2. conditionals. Solution(s): 1a. Grandfather in, after the Zaitsev trade, that you can't retain on any deal past one year remaining. Reinforce this like it was in previous versions of RGMG. 1b. If not, set a limit as to how much a team can retain per season (12M total, for example). This hopefully factors in the decision-making to retain on multi-year deals. -- 2a. If GM 1 trades a conditional pick, move over both the current pick and conditional pick (what it becomes in the scenario that conditions are met) to GM 2's roster so that GM 1 doesn't accidentally (or knowingly, if they're scummy) trade the conditional pick. 2b. Remove conditionals altogether and simply trade confirmed assets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SliteriousBlackbeard Posted April 21, 2018 Share Posted April 21, 2018 3 minutes ago, Alain Vigneault said: Only issues deterring this league at the moment are because of 1. retention and 2. conditionals. Solution(s): 1a. Grandfather in, after the Zaitsev trade, that you can't retain on any deal past one year remaining. Reinforce this like it was in previous versions of RGMG. 1b. If not, set a limit as to how much a team can retain per season (12M total, for example). This hopefully factors in the decision-making to retain on multi-year deals. -- 2a. If GM 1 trades a conditional pick, move over both the current pick and conditional pick (what it becomes in the scenario that conditions are met) to GM 2's roster so that GM 1 doesn't accidentally (or knowingly, if they're scummy) trade the conditional pick. 2b. Remove conditionals altogether and simply trade confirmed assets. Agree 100%. Any trades after this point should be clear and enforced so there is no confusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baer. Posted April 21, 2018 Author Share Posted April 21, 2018 Teams can only retain on 2 contracts at a time. Same as NHL. The Seabrook trade was vetoed because 1, Dallas was already retaining on 2 contracts and 2, it would have left Dallas with only 5 rostered defensemen. I have a spreadsheet recording all retentions. I feel this adds a bit more flexibility when trying to make a trade. As far as conditional picks go, I think we should do away with those. It's just too much unnecessary confusion. All current conditionals will remain valid, but we will not be accepting conditions on draft picks forthwith. If anybody has any more questions on salary retention please direct message me and I can clear up any confusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baer. Posted April 21, 2018 Author Share Posted April 21, 2018 If it wasn't already assumed by now, most of these "new" rules are simply emulating the NHL's rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SliteriousBlackbeard Posted April 21, 2018 Share Posted April 21, 2018 7 minutes ago, Baer. said: Teams can only retain on 2 contracts at a time. Same as NHL. The Seabrook trade was vetoed because 1, Dallas was already retaining on 2 contracts and 2, it would have left Dallas with only 5 rostered defensemen. I have a spreadsheet recording all retentions. I feel this adds a bit more flexibility when trying to make a trade. As far as conditional picks go, I think we should do away with those. It's just too much unnecessary confusion. All current conditionals will remain valid, but we will not be accepting conditions on draft picks forthwith. If anybody has any more questions on salary retention please direct message me and I can clear up any confusion. I was receiving demers back? So I would have has the same amount of defenseman and I could have called up any of my prospects. As for retention, I didn't know we couldn't trade our remaining contracts, and only two. That's my bad. Sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baer. Posted April 21, 2018 Author Share Posted April 21, 2018 1 minute ago, SliteriousBlackbeard said: I was receiving demers back? So I would have has the same amount of defenseman and I could have called up any on my prospects. As for retention on two deal. I didn't know we couldn't trade our remaining contracts, and only two. That's my bad. Sorry. Forsling was also part of the deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SliteriousBlackbeard Posted April 21, 2018 Share Posted April 21, 2018 1 minute ago, Baer. said: Forsling was also part of the deal. I had prospects. Either way it's done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyBoy44 Posted April 21, 2018 Share Posted April 21, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zigmund.Palffy Posted April 21, 2018 Share Posted April 21, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyBoy44 Posted April 21, 2018 Share Posted April 21, 2018 1 minute ago, Zach Parise said: I completely agree with this counter-point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sane33 Posted April 21, 2018 Share Posted April 21, 2018 8 minutes ago, MikeyBoy44 said: I completely agree with this counter-point. Haven’t even seen a better counter ever in my life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyBoy44 Posted April 22, 2018 Share Posted April 22, 2018 Sïm NÅo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zigmund.Palffy Posted April 22, 2018 Share Posted April 22, 2018 ***tumbleweed tumbling*** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrissex95 Posted April 22, 2018 Share Posted April 22, 2018 22 hours ago, Alain Vigneault said: @morrissex95 looking to ice two NHL teams? I'm a rebullding team looking to acquire as many picks, prospects and assets as possible. The Pittsburgh Penguins organization got much better with this deal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baer. Posted April 22, 2018 Author Share Posted April 22, 2018 1 hour ago, morrissex95 said: I'm a rebullding team looking to acquire as many picks, prospects and assets as possible. The Pittsburgh Penguins organization got much better with this deal You need to get down to 23 players. You can also send down wedgewood so he can get some games in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrissex95 Posted April 22, 2018 Share Posted April 22, 2018 3 minutes ago, Baer. said: You need to get down to 23 players. You can also send down wedgewood so he can get some games in. It's officially been taken care of Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyBoy44 Posted April 22, 2018 Share Posted April 22, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyBoy44 Posted April 22, 2018 Share Posted April 22, 2018 Daniel Sedin - Connor McDavid - Todd Bertuzzi Dimitrij Jaskin - RNH - Phil Kessel Jamie McGinn - TJ Compher - Kyle Palmeiri Jesper Fast - Brian Boyle - Alex Burrows Alex Goligoski - Mike Green Ben Hutton - Sami Vaatanen Marco Scandella - Matt Dumba Ben Bishop Michael Hutchinson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inane Posted April 22, 2018 Share Posted April 22, 2018 Updated Blues! Teravainen - Krejci - Wheeler Jenner - Galchenyuk - DrouinPerrault - Spooner- RyanHendricks - Eriksson Ek - Reaves Werenski - Phaneuf Sergachev - Zaitsev Enstrom - Russell Crawford Ullmark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.