• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.
CRAZY_4_NAZZY

[Rumor] Canucks interested in Tyler Bozak

Recommended Posts

No to Bozak.  Let our young guys play.  Need a key man back on the point for the power play though.  Someone with a shot that opposing players will not want to block.

 

 

  • Hydration 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

prefer Stastny on a short deal. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No more UFA's plz, build from within.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anything over 3 years is a loss, and no more then one of those guys should be signed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up some depth guys like MDZ/Gags again, but please no flyers on another LE type deal.

 

Build through the draft,  not through UFA.

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I can see Ownership forcing management to try and get one of the upcoming UFA's. Expect another albatross contract akin to the LE fiasco.

 

We should build from within. Let the young guys show what they have and give them the opportunity to play, learn, make mistakes and learn from those mistakes.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, DJSkingz said:

Unfortunately I can see Ownership forcing management to try and get one of the upcoming UFA's. Expect another albatross contract akin to the LE fiasco.

 

We should build from within. Let the young guys show what they have and give them the opportunity to play, learn, make mistakes and learn from those mistakes.

I'm ok with a 1-2 year signing now that we know the Sedins will be gone.  Just something to stop-gap the center position so Pettersson isn't thrown to the wolves right away.

  • Hydration 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With Daniel and Henrik retiring, we will be looking for guys to bring more depth and leadership to the team.

 

If available, I'm positive that we will put a good offer in front of Kane.

 

I also expect that with closing out the Sedin era, we will be more active on the trade front than most teams in the league.

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, kloubek said:

I'm ok with a 1-2 year signing now that we know the Sedins will be gone.  Just something to stop-gap the center position so Pettersson isn't thrown to the wolves right away.

Agreed..guy's great on draws too.

Bo

Sutter

Bozak

 

We'd start with the puck a lot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Too soon. Still getting over the shock, you knew it was coming but not prepared for it just the same. 

 

I'll let Benning do the work. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We don't need more centres unless his name is Tavares. Kane or bust

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just play the kids, that's what the fans want.

Yes to Kane or Neal, other than that please no.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Would love Bozak on a 2 year deal

  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hard pass, we have limited roster spots as it is, even with the Sedins retiring.  Horvat, Pettersson, Sutter, Gaudette, Granlund, Gaunce can certainly fulfill C duties.

 

We will almost certainly add a UFA, but I think we go after a bigger ticket -- EKane, and unless the Isles resign him, better believe inquiries will be made about Tavares.  Rumours of Eriksson moving on will only increase that likelihood.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Consistent 45-50 pt guy and good on faceoffs. Id take him on a short deal. Only open the Bank for Kane and Carlson. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If we get Bozak. Does that mark Sutter as a moveable asset next season?

 

Horvat

Bozak

Gaudette

Sutter

 

Pettersson starts on wing. Edler for captian imo.

 

 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.