Gator Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 TO DAL Granlund Edler 3rd TO VAN Spezza 1st ----------------------- TO COL Hutton Lind DAL 1st TO VAN Makar ----------------------- TO MTL Tanev Baertschi 2nd TO VAN Drouin ----------------------- TO FLA Markstrom DePietro 5th TO VAN Luongo 2nd ----------------------- *** IF WE DON'T WIN DAHLIN WE OFFER OUR 1ST THIS YEAR + NEXT YEAR (UNPROTECTED) TO GET DAHLIN NEXT YEARS LINES... Drouin Horvat Boeser Virtanen Spezza Pettersson Goldobin Gaudette Gagner Eriksson Sutter Leipsic UFA Gudbranson Dahlin Stecher Juolevi Makar Luongo Nilsson/Demko FUTURE LINES... Dahlen Pettersson Boeser Drouin Horvat Virtanen Goldobin Gaudette Liepsic McEwen Gaunce Gadjovich Dahlin Tryamkin Juolevi Makar XXXXX Gudbranson/Stecher Demko Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scheif16 Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 Not trading Kole Lind! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gator Posted April 17, 2018 Author Share Posted April 17, 2018 1 hour ago, scheif16 said: Not trading Kole Lind! Not even for Makar? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob_Zepp Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 MASSIVE overpayment for Drouin. Drouin is a slightly more hyped and promoted version of Goldy but with less drive. That trade to the Habs would need to have their first this year coming back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kloubek Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 21 minutes ago, Rob_Zepp said: MASSIVE overpayment for Drouin. Drouin is a slightly more hyped and promoted version of Goldy but with less drive. That trade to the Habs would need to have their first this year coming back. I agree. Of all the trades in this proposal, that one I said no-go to. Getting Makar would be incredible, so I like the overall idea but this just wouldn't happen. I really don't think we need to bring in any more forward talent unless we're talking a true elite player to play on the LW along with Pettersson and Boeser. Otherwise, we have plenty of players coming down the pipe who are going to be as good as Drouin. (Overall). Oh... and getting Luongo back? Not even sure we would be allowed to nor do we need to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob_Zepp Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 5 minutes ago, kloubek said: I agree. Of all the trades in this proposal, that one I said no-go to. Getting Makar would be incredible, so I like the overall idea but this just wouldn't happen. I really don't think we need to bring in any more forward talent unless we're talking a true elite player to play on the LW along with Pettersson and Boeser. Otherwise, we have plenty of players coming down the pipe who are going to be as good as Drouin. (Overall). Ya and not a hope Colorado trades a top 5ish pick for a 2nd, 5th and late first round....quantity rarely gets you quality. As Barrie is likely on way out due to cost within two years, Makar is key to their future. Canucks would have a better chance getting Barrie and his last two years on deal before UFA that Colorado likely won't want to get into bidding war on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IBatch Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 I like where your going with this, the idea of major change in the lineup is always encouraging at this stage. Not a fan of Drouin, but like the creativity. This team needs more than Edler and Tanev on defense, so anything that includes adding more skilled help there would be helpful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kloubek Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 53 minutes ago, Rob_Zepp said: Ya and not a hope Colorado trades a top 5ish pick for a 2nd, 5th and late first round....quantity rarely gets you quality. As Barrie is likely on way out due to cost within two years, Makar is key to their future. Canucks would have a better chance getting Barrie and his last two years on deal before UFA that Colorado likely won't want to get into bidding war on. Barrie is very offensively talented, but I think he needs to be paired with a highly skilled defender like Tanev. If Tanev is on his way out, unless we can find a similarly talented stay at home guy I'm almost inclined to think I'd pass on him considering the amount of money he would want. Still, if he ends up going UFA if we haven't solved our scoring from the blueline yet, then I'm sure he'd be a consideration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 You say this as though we're not already in a full rebuild. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildcam Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 5 hours ago, Brock Botanen said: TO DAL Granlund Edler 3rd TO VAN Spezza 1st ----------------------- TO COL Hutton Lind DAL 1st TO VAN Makar ----------------------- TO MTL Tanev Baertschi 2nd TO VAN Drouin ----------------------- TO FLA Markstrom DePietro 5th TO VAN Luongo 2nd ----------------------- *** IF WE DON'T WIN DAHLIN WE OFFER OUR 1ST THIS YEAR + NEXT YEAR (UNPROTECTED) TO GET DAHLIN NEXT YEARS LINES... Drouin Horvat Boeser Virtanen Spezza Pettersson Goldobin Gaudette Gagner Eriksson Sutter Leipsic UFA Gudbranson Dahlin Stecher Juolevi Makar Luongo Nilsson/Demko FUTURE LINES... Dahlen Pettersson Boeser Drouin Horvat Virtanen Goldobin Gaudette Liepsic McEwen Gaunce Gadjovich Dahlin Tryamkin Juolevi Makar XXXXX Gudbranson/Stecher Demko THOSE ARE TRADES YOU MAKE IN ? EA HOCKEY 2018....NEVER NEVER ALL CRAZY TRADES FOR ALL TEAMS... GOOD THING YOUR NOT A GM YOU WOULD LAST 1 MONTH... FIRED FIRED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tryamkin88 Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 Dont see how it's a rebuild with Luongo coming back and us losing Depietro, a young goalie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 Trade #1 - I'd do this trade. Spezza could help C the 2nd line and the extra 1st is nice. Edler's NTC is gone now too. Trade #2 - I doubt very highly that COL trades Makar, and I doubt Benning will want to trade Lind. Trade #3 - Overpayment for Drouin. Maybe don't include the pick. Trade #4 - Trading our starting goalie and our goalie prospect for a goalie almost set to retire? No thanks. Besides, remember, Lu didn't want to be here. That's kind of important. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J.I.A.H.N Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 6 hours ago, Brock Botanen said: TO DAL I like this trade in it's spirit and think there is a good chance Dallas might take it.... Granlund I would take out the 3rd and offer McEneny Edler 3rd TO VAN I would flip Spezza at the TDL for 50% cap retention, so the cost to the trading team Spezza would be approx. $1,250,000 for the remainder of the year to the trading team 1st for a 2019 2nd + 2019 3rd ----------------------- TO COL Hutton Lind Love Maker, but Colorado won't be making this trade, and honestly, as much as I DAL 1st understand the premise, I keep Lind who is doing well in 2 games in Utica, and the 1st brings in a good player in a strong year.......but yeah Maker would look great in TO VAN a Canuck uniform Makar ----------------------- TO MTL I get the trade, don't like the player To NYI Tanev What about Tanev Baertschi Baertschi 2nd TO VAN To Vancouver Drouin Calgary's 2018 1st ----------------------- Calgary's 2018 2nd TO FLA Markstrom I really like the premise, but I have suggested a trade some what like this before DePietro and it has been pointed out that Loui has his whole family there now and there is not 5th much chance he's coming.......but if you could pull it off, I would take out DePietro and the 5th.............Luongo will retire in the next 2 years, Florida might want to TO VAN replace him now.........Note that the risk is not having a number one if Demko is Luongo not ready 2nd Nice try..........good way to start a discussion...........My opinions are just that and worth about a nickel............ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 Montreal doesn’t even consider this. Tanev isn’t needed. They also have several left wingers in the vein on Baertschi. Like it or not (I don’t), at the moment Drouin is their 1C. On a team already weak down the middle thus trade makes them even worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 2 hours ago, qwijibo said: Montreal doesn’t even consider this. Tanev isn’t needed. They also have several left wingers in the vein on Baertschi. Like it or not (I don’t), at the moment Drouin is their 1C. On a team already weak down the middle thus trade makes them even worse. Seriously? Montreal would love to dump Drouin. The guy is clearly not a player a team can win with, especially with that contract of his. No way do we want that guy. I wouldn't trade Baer straight across for Drouin. Baer is way cheaper, and a better 200 foot player. I do like the idea of getting Makar, but I know the Avs aren't trading him away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 Just now, Alflives said: Seriously? Montreal would love to dump Drouin. The guy is clearly not a player a team can win with, especially with that contract of his. No way do we want that guy. I wouldn't trade Baer straight across for Drouin. Baer is way cheaper, and a better 200 foot player. I do like the idea of getting Makar, but I know the Avs aren't trading him away. They’re going to dump him after one season of learning to play centre? Give your head a shake. They gave up a potential top pairing D to get him. And his game improved dramatically towards the end of the season. They’re going to give him every opportunity to become the centre they need. Not dump him off for a middling winger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NHL'er Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 7 hours ago, scheif16 said: Not trading Kole Lind! "Why isn't anyone trading Kole Lind???" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 4 minutes ago, qwijibo said: They’re going to dump him after one season of learning to play centre? Give your head a shake. They gave up a potential top pairing D to get him. And his game improved dramatically towards the end of the season. They’re going to give him every opportunity to become the centre they need. Not dump him off for a middling winger. We can agree the trade scenarios proposed in the OP are preposterous? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VegasCanuck Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 5 hours ago, Rob_Zepp said: MASSIVE overpayment for Drouin. Drouin is a slightly more hyped and promoted version of Goldy but with less drive. That trade to the Habs would need to have their first this year coming back. I agree, Montreal made a mistake on that trade. They keep doing some pretty dumb trades Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IBatch Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 38 minutes ago, VegasCanuck said: I agree, Montreal made a mistake on that trade. They keep doing some pretty dumb trades Don't know how he's kept his job as long as he has. Understood the Subban trade, but it was lopsided considering age, the Sergechev trade is a little early but so far it's a complete bust. Trading a future Norris candidate for a skilled but entitled winger that really hasn't done anything special at all yet, other than make headlines with Yzerman. The Joker must have charisma up the Ying Yang to be surviving the Montreal spotlight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpeg.0d00651e5a8af8c57be7732916818427.jpeg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.