Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

(Proposal) OTT-VAN


Recommended Posts

TO OTT

Hutton

 

TO VAN

Ryan

2018 1st

 

We win Dahlin and Svechnikov. Svechnikov convinces Tryamkin to come back, and boo., rebuild complete.

 

Ryan plays very well for us and we trade him + Gudbranson for mid picks in 2-3 years, and we also find a way to dump Eriksson.

 

In 3-5 years...

 

Svechnikov Pettersson Boeser

Virtanen Horvat Dahlen

Goldobin Gaudette Lind

McEwen Gaunce Leipsic

 

Dahlin Tryamkin

Juolevi Stecher

Brisebois Tanev

 

Demko

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, 48MPHSlapShot said:

No way Ottawa coughs up a lottery pick just for someone to eat Ryan's contract.

Agreed especially since they have to give p their first this year or next. Basically trading another would mean they don't have their 2 firsts the next 2 years.

 

9 minutes ago, janisahockeynut said:

I like the dream, but no way Ottawa does that...........

 

My dream is...............

 

Bobby Ryan

Thomas Chabot

 

for

 

Ben Hutton

Sven Baertschi

haha to me that seems even more unrealistic considering how they value Chabot.Dont get me wrong if we could make that trade we should lol

 

Ottawa does have Pittsburghs first though and they really want to get rid of Ryans contract. For another 4 years at 7.25Mil they will have to buck up to get rid of him.

 

Perhaps

 

Formenton+1st+Ryan

for

Hutton

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if ottawa wants to dump that contract

they'll likely end up dealing with a team that is trying to reach the salary floor

or a team prepared to accept less for rebuilding purposes

he is still an active player with some value as a player

 

i can see the canucks looking to dump a contract (not loui's)

and taking ryan and a 2nd

maybe move gagner for ryan and the 2nd

 

we still take on a lot of contract

but given our youth (many players will not need to be protected) either he or erickssson could be exposed in the seattle expansion

and just like the vegas draft

they might be forced to take the player we most want to unload

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, coastal.view said:

if ottawa wants to dump that contract

they'll likely end up dealing with a team that is trying to reach the salary floor

or a team prepared to accept less for rebuilding purposes

he is still an active player with some value as a player

 

i can see the canucks looking to dump a contract (not loui's)

and taking ryan and a 2nd

maybe move gagner for ryan and the 2nd

 

we still take on a lot of contract

but given our youth (many players will not need to be protected) either he or erickssson could be exposed in the seattle expansion

and just like the vegas draft

they might be forced to take the player we most want to unload

 

With all due respect Coastal...........he doesn't have any value........take a look at the last 2 years.......he is strictly a offensive player.....with nota hell of a lot of offense.........not worth the risk unless you are going to bury $7 + million a year for 4..........sad!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesnt make sense for either team.  We are not going to want to have that kind of cap hit in 4 years.  Its too lojg when we have Boeser, Pettersson and every other contract re-signed.

 

For Ottawa, it gives them cap space, sure, but with Karlsson probably gone they are headed for a rebuild.  They just havent accepted that yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, janisahockeynut said:

With all due respect Coastal...........he doesn't have any value........take a look at the last 2 years.......he is strictly a offensive player.....with nota hell of a lot of offense.........not worth the risk unless you are going to bury $7 + million a year for 4..........sad!

he was scoring at a 0.5 rate this past season

the guy has been dealing with issues that have distracted him from hockey

 

i think the risk is reasonable if an existing contract is off loaded and a reasonable draft pick is obtained

remember ottawa's 2nd is just outside the 1st round

 

and the seattle expansion is slated for 2 years from now i think

he can be exposed .. or loui can be

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, coastal.view said:

he was scoring at a 0.5 rate this past season

the guy has been dealing with issues that have distracted him from hockey

 

i think the risk is reasonable if an existing contract is off loaded and a reasonable draft pick is obtained

remember ottawa's 2nd is just outside the 1st round

 

and the seattle expansion is slated for 2 years from now i think

he can be exposed .. or loui can be

 

I don't know Coastal.......It has to be a pretty good return for 28+ million

 

I get what you are saying.........and Chabot is just a dream

 

But it's got to be ........

Pitts 2018 1st + Formenton..............at least

 

Ottawa gets a lot of cap space to play with or in Melnyk's case......save

if Ryan turns around,,,,great, if he doesn't......we eat it!

 

You have to get something for 28+ million have to!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, janisahockeynut said:

I don't know Coastal.......It has to be a pretty good return for 28+ million

 

I get what you are saying.........and Chabot is just a dream

 

But it's got to be ........

Pitts 2018 1st + Formenton..............at least

 

Ottawa gets a lot of cap space to play with or in Melnyk's case......save

if Ryan turns around,,,,great, if he doesn't......we eat it!

 

You have to get something for 28+ million have to!

it's not 28 million

it is what is left after they take on a contract we want to dump as well

if the nut is too big . some salary retention by ottawa can also be built in . but it would not be much . maybe 1 or 2 million a year

i just think the general mechanics of such a deal (we get high 2nd round pick, lose a contract, get ryan) could work for the canucks

 

edit:  maybe try this janis

figure out what ryan is worth on an annual basis

figure out what you think their high 2nd round pick is worth if it was just sold for dollars ($5 million?)

figure out what the offset salary is worth

$28 - 5 - 7 = 16 .. gives you ryan for 4 years at 4 per year - he is still worth close to that i think

if not, a minor adjustment in salary retention

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, coastal.view said:

it's not 28 million

it is what is left after they take on a contract we want to dump as well

if the nut is too big . some salary retention by ottawa can also be built in . but it would not be much . maybe 1 or 2 million a year

i just think the general mechanics of such a deal (we get high 2nd round pick, lose a contract, get ryan) could work for the canucks

I do see your game plan.......

But lets say we send them Hutton

and we take the 2nd

they flip Hutton for a 3rd...maybe a 4th and their cost isn't so great

I would not let them get off so easy.......just remember the payments Chicago has made to get rid of cap space

 

I guess in the end......if it was so easy, it would have been done

He does have a MNTC as well....I am sure our name is on it, anyways

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, janisahockeynut said:

I do see your game plan.......

But lets say we send them Hutton

and we take the 2nd

they flip Hutton for a 3rd...maybe a 4th and their cost isn't so great

I would not let them get off so easy.......just remember the payments Chicago has made to get rid of cap space

 

I guess in the end......if it was so easy, it would have been done

He does have a MNTC as well....I am sure our name is on it, anyways

read my post again . i edited it

 

and don't worry about what ottawa might / could do

we could flip ryan to some other team for some assets by taking some salary retention on him ourselves

ottawa should not care what we do with ryan once we get him if the deal is fair

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, janisahockeynut said:

I like the dream, but no way Ottawa does that...........

 

My dream is...............

 

Bobby Ryan

Thomas Chabot

 

for

 

Ben Hutton

Sven Baertschi

I'd do that, I'd even add Baertschi to my deal, I just assumed us taking on Ryan's contract would be a huge piece to the deal

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, coastal.view said:

read my post again . i edited it

 

and don't worry about what ottawa might / could do

we could flip ryan to some other team for some assets by taking some salary retention on him ourselves

ottawa should not care what we do with ryan once we get him if the deal is fair

No , I get it, and it is the flip side of the same coin.....

But he has 13 and 11 goals the last 2 years.........I am just no sure he is worth the $4 Million

 

Like I said though, he has a modified NTC in his contract, so I doubt he would be coming here

 

I am not cold to your point......probably just me being greedy............

I think I would be going for shorter term contracts if that was the only pay off..............

 

PS.......Ottawa doesn't have a 2nd this year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Brock Botanen said:

TO OTT

Hutton

 

TO VAN

Ryan

2018 1st

 

We win Dahlin and Svechnikov. Svechnikov convinces Tryamkin to come back, and boo., rebuild complete.

 

Ryan plays very well for us and we trade him + Gudbranson for mid picks in 2-3 years, and we also find a way to dump Eriksson.

 

In 3-5 years...

 

Svechnikov Pettersson Boeser

Virtanen Horvat Dahlen

Goldobin Gaudette Lind

McEwen Gaunce Leipsic

 

Dahlin Tryamkin

Juolevi Stecher

Brisebois Tanev

 

Demko

 

More EA sports trades... NEVER Ottawa trade there top 5 pick to take Ryan's salary..

 

EVERY TEAM WANTS TO KEEP THERE !ST ROUND PICKS AND OTTAWA SHOULD GET TOP 5

 

NEVER WILL HAPPEN.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For us to take in Ryan (who did play somewhat like his former self in last year's playoffs, but otherwise less useful than L.E ) I don't think I could stomach it unless we knew we were going to get a player back.  I'd do L.E.  in return for their second this year, which won't be much different than PIT first if they make it back to the final, otherwise stay away.   I wouldn't bank on Seattle taking either of these guys considering who else will be left unprotected either.

 

Weaponizing our cap so to speak only works if we get somebody back that fits in our timeline (three years at most, two would be better) and if we get a good prospect or at least good odds of drafting someone who actually will play.  I know I'm been greedy saying take L.E., but that's the only way I'd stomach that sort of deal.

 

This guy isn't hated like Heatley was here and has had some life issues that may be affecting him, but he's not well liked either.   Id prefer if we looked elsewhere for extra picks.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...