• Announcements

    • StealthNuck

      Forum-specific Rules   07/11/2017

      These are board specific rules for the Trades and Rumors forum designed to provide organization and a better experience for everyone. Please review these rules before posting new threads. 
        THREAD ETIQUETTE   1. Please search for an existing thread before posting. This forum can be very fast moving, so it's understandable if redundant threads are inadvertently posted. In such a case, please use the report feature to request removal of redundant threads.    2. Provide a clearly identifiable topic title so that users can readily understand the content. The title should include any and all teams involved, as well as player names or other personnel involved as appropriate.   3. All trades, signings, rumors and other news MUST include a linkable source. Simply posting the name of the source is not enough. Effort should also be made to copy and paste the full article, or at the very least the relevant portion of text from the source to the first post of the thread. Moderators may remove low-quality threads in favour of high-quality threads. 

      Affixed to the front of your title should be a label that identifies the type of transaction that is taking place. For all trades use [TRADE]. For all signings use [SIGNING]. For all waiver-wire transactions use [WAIVERS]. For all rumours use [RUMOUR].
      For articles or news items that don't fit into the above categories, affix an appropriate label of your choice such as [NEWS], [ARTICLE] or [MISC].   4. When the status of a thread changes a new thread can be created. The new thread should reflect the change and help focus the discussion on current events. e.g. Someone may create a new thread when a rumor becomes a trades. The old thread will be locked by the moderating team.    5. Do not misrepresent the contents of your thread or post false trades or rumors. Trolling will result in a permanent suspension. 

      SOURCES   The following source types are considered INVALID. Any links to posts or threads on other message boards Any links to personal blogs Any news heard on the radio that does not have a link to an audio vault or podcast Any news seen on television that does not have a link to online video Any news spread by word of mouth
      Additionally, certain sources may be be blacklisted due to poor credentials, clear traffic-mongering etc. Blacklisted sources will be posted here. 
      Thank you for your co-operation and please PM the Administrator or Moderators if you have any questions, concerns or suggestions regarding this forum.
Adarsh Sant

[Signing] Sharks re-sign Evander Kane to long term contract

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Qwags said:

Well, so much for that.

Basically :lol:

 

All aboard the trade for Jenner train!?

  • Hydration 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, billabong said:

Not surprised. Seemingly good fit in SJ

 

Defiantly overpaid, he’s getting more than hall, mackinnon and gaudreau.

 

i wouldn’t have gone over 6m 

 

at least now that domino has fallen early so we can move on 

different scenarios lol..

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good Luck with that San Jose LOL. terrible term and $$ amount.  Guess we will be battling Kane in the postseason for years to come.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Rob_Zepp said:

Canucks are in wrong stage of their rebuild for 7 years at 7 to most anyone that isn't a superstar.   He was a good fit in SJ but my guess this contract will look like Lucic's sooner than later.  

Yup. Evander is only 26 but he plays a heavy game. Probably when he's 30 or 31 he'll be a mid 6 player making 7 mil. Which is not ideal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, sonoman said:

Yessss!  Now the Kane to Vancouver talk can finally stop. 

Until the talks start about us eating his contract because its overpaid LOL. No I'm joking. We will be in prime then. Will leave that up to another team.

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Qwags said:

I wouldn't mind signing Antoine Roussel.

He's my go-to role player too. He would fit nicely on our 3rd or 4th line.

  • Hydration 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Qwags said:

I wouldn't mind signing Antoine Roussel.

I'm all over that 'train' as well ;) Would gladly take both!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

u ve gota draft em, develop them, develop the core. There are no shortcuts to the cup. Glad those rumors will br put to bed. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Let's hope Jim doesn't go out and overpay JVR now.  Ugh, that would be even worse than overpaying Kane.  Statsny is the only guy I'd feel comfortable paying top dollar 2 if Jim felt he would be our 2nd line C during our peak.  Flip-flop with Pettersson at C. He could be useful for 5-6 years easy.

 

Edited by Rush17

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What happened to the "He's going to go to free agency and go for the money?"

 

Told you he'd sign in San Jose. He's a good fit there. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Nuck1991 said:

u ve gota draft em, develop them, develop the core. There are no shortcuts to the cup. Glad those rumors will br put to bed. 

Evander Kane. If he is still in the nhl when he hits 32 I will be surprised.  I got a feeling his career is going to end pre-maturely.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Ghostsof1915 said:

What happened to the "He's going to go to free agency and go for the money?"

 

Told you he'd sign in San Jose. He's a good fit there. 

He got the money before free agency. :) No way he gets much more than 7 million in free agency.  If he held out and got lower offers San Jose could have lowered their offer. He was smart to cash out well the strong offer was on the table. San Jose is a pretty well-run organization so I can't say its a bad move for him.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.