Pete M Posted June 15, 2018 Share Posted June 15, 2018 If Dobson and Bouchard are both available, then trade Tanev for Chicago's 8th OA pick. Possibly take on Seabrook's contract for a sweetner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
combover Posted June 15, 2018 Share Posted June 15, 2018 YES. Even if those guys aren’t. I’d trade tanev for a top ten pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makaramel MacKhiato Posted June 15, 2018 Share Posted June 15, 2018 I could see it IF we take on Seabrook's contract too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted June 15, 2018 Share Posted June 15, 2018 Only if Benning has compromising photos of Stan Bowman with a donkey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete M Posted June 15, 2018 Author Share Posted June 15, 2018 Edler Gud Seabrook Stech OJ Bouchard MDZ Dobson Hutton Pouliot Biega Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob_Zepp Posted June 15, 2018 Share Posted June 15, 2018 14 minutes ago, Pete M said: If Dobson and Bouchard are both available, then trade Tanev for Chicago's 8th OA pick. Possibly take on Seabrook's contract for a sweetner. Why not Tanev for 8th and Hossa? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete M Posted June 15, 2018 Author Share Posted June 15, 2018 1 minute ago, Rob_Zepp said: Why not Tanev for 8th and Hossa? Is Hossa still on the books? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete M Posted June 15, 2018 Author Share Posted June 15, 2018 Seabrook's contract is bad...Luongo bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Great Canucks Posted June 15, 2018 Share Posted June 15, 2018 Seabrook's contract is garbage. Why the hell would we want it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VegasCanuck Posted June 15, 2018 Share Posted June 15, 2018 30 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said: Only if Benning has compromising photos of Stan Bowman with a donkey. Wait, are you saying he doesn't??? Then, what the hell has he been doing the last 3 years if not accumulating incriminating photos of his fellow GM's? Must I do EVERYTHING???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted June 15, 2018 Share Posted June 15, 2018 3 minutes ago, VegasCanuck said: Wait, are you saying he doesn't??? Then, what the hell has he been doing the last 3 years if not accumulating incriminating photos of his fellow GM's? Must I do EVERYTHING???? I was wondering why you were walking down the street in a Ghillie Suit..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VegasCanuck Posted June 15, 2018 Share Posted June 15, 2018 1 minute ago, Ghostsof1915 said: I was wondering why you were walking down the street in a Ghillie Suit..... Just need the right midgets with a team of sheep and goats, lots of alcohol and a photographer with low morals and you can MOVE THE WORLD! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NHL'er Posted June 15, 2018 Share Posted June 15, 2018 16 minutes ago, The Great Canucks said: Seabrook's contract is garbage. Why the hell would we want it? To get the 8th overall pick?? Has you been reading? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted June 15, 2018 Share Posted June 15, 2018 29 minutes ago, The Great Canucks said: Seabrook's contract is garbage. Why the hell would we want it? well... because Seabrook probably has 3 more good seasons in him, and we'd be able to get two potential top pairing D in the next draft? I don't mind the idea at all tbh, Seabrook is a good leader, would be just fine in a 4-6 role and could be bought out if there's another compliance buy out window for the next CBA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aGENT Posted June 15, 2018 Share Posted June 15, 2018 Tanev 50% retained would be a better idea than taking on Seabrook's horrendous contract. That should get you pretty close to 8th OA value +/-. See if we could take back Anisimiov (he'd need to waive) and his contract as well for an even better return (and he could C Pettersson for a couple years). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete M Posted June 15, 2018 Author Share Posted June 15, 2018 14 minutes ago, Jimmy McGill said: well... because Seabrook probably has 3 more good seasons in him, and we'd be able to get two potential top pairing D in the next draft? I don't mind the idea at all tbh, Seabrook is a good leader, would be just fine in a 4-6 role and could be bought out if there's another compliance buy out window for the next CBA. Exactly...Seabrook replaces Tanev in the next 3 years and we get two stud Dmen that could step in this or next year. Chicago gets a good shutdown dman and needed cap space... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silky mitts Posted June 15, 2018 Share Posted June 15, 2018 Why would Chicago do that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted June 15, 2018 Share Posted June 15, 2018 2 minutes ago, Pete M said: Exactly...Seabrook replaces Tanev in the next 3 years and we get two stud Dmen that could step in this or next year. Chicago gets a good shutdown dman and needed cap space... Gives us another PP option as well. I suppose it depends on how desperate CHI is for cap space and expansion protection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete M Posted June 15, 2018 Author Share Posted June 15, 2018 2 minutes ago, Silky mitts said: Why would Chicago do that get rid of Seabrook's contract so that they can sign Tavares???...lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckylager Posted June 15, 2018 Share Posted June 15, 2018 11 minutes ago, Pete M said: get rid of Seabrook's contract so that they can sign Tavares???...lol Chicago is still happy to have Seabrook around, at least they said so to the media not long ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.