sean_p47 Posted June 18, 2018 Share Posted June 18, 2018 Just read that Philadelphia and Hextall are looking to add a RHD defenseman to their top 4. Went over to HFboards and they already had a discussion going. Wanted your thoughts on the following: To PHI Tanev To VAN 1st round (14th) 2nd round (50th) Andrew MacDonald Too much? Too little? Minor change get this done? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dixon Ward Posted June 18, 2018 Share Posted June 18, 2018 8 minutes ago, sean_p47 said: Just read that Philadelphia and Hextall are looking to add a RHD defenseman to their top 4. Went over to HFboards and they already had a discussion going. Wanted your thoughts on the following: To PHI Tanev To VAN 1st round (14th) 2nd round (50th) Andrew MacDonald Too much? Too little? Minor change get this done? I would do this. I am not sure Hextal would though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted June 18, 2018 Share Posted June 18, 2018 Excellent proposal. Very fair for both teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Blight Posted June 18, 2018 Share Posted June 18, 2018 27 minutes ago, sean_p47 said: Just read that Philadelphia and Hextall are looking to add a RHD defenseman to their top 4. Went over to HFboards and they already had a discussion going. Wanted your thoughts on the following: To PHI Tanev To VAN 1st round (14th) 2nd round (50th) Andrew MacDonald Too much? Too little? Minor change get this done? If the 2nd round pick is payment for us to take on MacDonald's contract then I doubt Philly would make this trade. They could simply buy out MacDonald and save most of his Cap hit without having to give up a 2nd round pick. The Cap hit is in the far right column. Andrew MacDonald Buyout Details Cost Calculations BUYOUT DATE BASE SALARY REMAINING S.BONUS REMAINING YEARS REMAINING BUYOUT LENGTH AGE BUYOUT RATIO TOTAL COST TOTAL SAVINGS ANNUAL COST Jun 15, 2018 $11,250,000 $0 2 4 31 2/3 $7,500,000 $3,750,000 $1,875,000 Cap Hit Calculations SEASON BASE SALARY INITIAL CAP HIT ACTUAL COST SAVINGS FINAL CAP HIT 2018-19 $5,500,000 $5,000,000 $1,875,000 $3,625,000 $1,375,000 2019-20 $5,750,000 $5,000,000 $1,875,000 $3,875,000 $1,125,000 2020-21 $0 $0 $1,875,000 -$1,875,000 $1,875,000 2021-22 $0 $0 $1,875,000 -$1,875,000 $1,875,000 TOTAL $11,250,000 $10,000,000 $7,500,000 $3,750,000 $6,250,000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Father Ryan Posted June 19, 2018 Share Posted June 19, 2018 1 hour ago, sean_p47 said: Just read that Philadelphia and Hextall are looking to add a RHD defenseman to their top 4. Went over to HFboards and they already had a discussion going. Wanted your thoughts on the following: To PHI Tanev To VAN 1st round (14th) 2nd round (50th) Andrew MacDonald Too much? Too little? Minor change get this done? That 2nd...too much. I could see that deal with a 4th vs the 2nd. Considering the buyout option open for Philly, a 2nd would be really steep. But the 1st...that would be great to have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
underrated Posted June 19, 2018 Share Posted June 19, 2018 I like this deal. I'd do it even if the 2nd round pick is lowered to a 3rd, or maybe a 4th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bure1010 Posted June 19, 2018 Share Posted June 19, 2018 I think that’s a fair trade. With philly in win now mode they’d wanna save and use every penny they can towards the cap and use it on fa’s or for trades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cripplereh Posted June 19, 2018 Share Posted June 19, 2018 probably be a 1st next year so we have two at home and a 4th this year but then we need a RD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theo5789 Posted June 19, 2018 Share Posted June 19, 2018 1 hour ago, cripplereh said: probably be a 1st next year so we have two at home and a 4th this year but then we need a RD I think the #14 is too high of a pick for Tanev, so I like this idea. Tanev if he performs should help them get into the playoffs so it'll be a lower 1st which they might be okay with. Have the pick lottery protected for their sake. Getting a 4th back this year would replenish that round for us. Not sure about why they would want to move MacDonald though. He's their assistant captain and they aren't really tight against the cap and he's only signed for a couple of years more. I don't view him as a cap dump type of player for them and he is a RD, so moving him for Tanev doesn't seem very productive for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted June 19, 2018 Share Posted June 19, 2018 Hextall just last week: “We look at everything. We’re trying to get better for today without sacrificing. It would be easy to make a deal to make us better. So we could do that, sacrifice a lot of our future. But that’s not going to happen.” Back in February: Hextall reiterated that he is sticking to the plan and looking at the bigger picture. “We’re not gonna make a deal that makes us a little bit better right now where we give up two young assets, a good young player, a draft pick,” he said. “We’re not gonna make deals to go essentially all-in one year,” he continued. When Hextall took over as general manager he set a plan in motion. He’s staying on course. “We can’t forget about the window. We’re not going to mortgage our future to take one run with rentals and stuff. We’re going to do it the seven, eight, ten year way where we feel we’ll be competitive for a long span of time without mortgaging the future.” They are not in an all-in now mode - they want to progress but he is focused on building for their future. Tanev is two seasons to UFA. He's not part of the 7 to 10 year plan. It's the same reason they moved Schenn at the draft when they saw Frost was available - he is a few years away but they have him for years to come. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted June 19, 2018 Share Posted June 19, 2018 52 minutes ago, theo5789 said: I think the #14 is too high of a pick for Tanev, so I like this idea. Tanev if he performs should help them get into the playoffs so it'll be a lower 1st which they might be okay with. Have the pick lottery protected for their sake. Getting a 4th back this year would replenish that round for us. Not sure about why they would want to move MacDonald though. He's their assistant captain and they aren't really tight against the cap and he's only signed for a couple of years more. I don't view him as a cap dump type of player for them and he is a RD, so moving him for Tanev doesn't seem very productive for them. Flyers are more likely trying to get pick 7 out of the Canucks - Hextall doesn't sound like he's interested in trading for veterans but rather wants to continue his slow rebuild approach. This is the Flyers beat writer Carchidi on Vancouver's pick #7: http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/flyers/485702611.html Will Hextall try to move up in the draft to, say, No. 7 overall, a pick that Vancouver is reportedly dangling? At No. 7, he would have a chance to get a player with a higher upside than at 14. Among the desirable players expected to be there at No.7 are centers Barrett Hayton (Frost’s teammate in juniors) and Jesperi Kotkaniemi, and righthanded defensemen such as Noah Dobson, Evan Bouchard and Adam Boqvist. Hextall might have to deal Nos. 14 and 19 to get to No. 7. Or perhaps trading No. 14 and a player such as Nic Aube-Kubel, a speedy Phantoms winger who has a chance to make the Flyers at training camp, would get it done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theo5789 Posted June 19, 2018 Share Posted June 19, 2018 14 minutes ago, mll said: Flyers are more likely trying to get pick 7 out of the Canucks - Hextall doesn't sound like he's interested in trading for veterans but rather wants to continue his slow rebuild approach. This is the Flyers beat writer Carchidi on Vancouver's pick #7: http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/flyers/485702611.html Will Hextall try to move up in the draft to, say, No. 7 overall, a pick that Vancouver is reportedly dangling? At No. 7, he would have a chance to get a player with a higher upside than at 14. Among the desirable players expected to be there at No.7 are centers Barrett Hayton (Frost’s teammate in juniors) and Jesperi Kotkaniemi, and righthanded defensemen such as Noah Dobson, Evan Bouchard and Adam Boqvist. Hextall might have to deal Nos. 14 and 19 to get to No. 7. Or perhaps trading No. 14 and a player such as Nic Aube-Kubel, a speedy Phantoms winger who has a chance to make the Flyers at training camp, would get it done. Could be interesting to get #14 and #19. Depending on how the draft plays out, we could come out of the 1st round with Ty Smith and Kupari/Lundestrom or Veleno and Miller/Wilde which would address a couple of needs for the team. If Zadina somehow drops, or Boqvist and maybe even Kotkaniemi are still on the board, I might rather just keep the 7th overall though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallstreetamigo Posted June 19, 2018 Share Posted June 19, 2018 10 hours ago, mll said: Flyers are more likely trying to get pick 7 out of the Canucks - Hextall doesn't sound like he's interested in trading for veterans but rather wants to continue his slow rebuild approach. This is the Flyers beat writer Carchidi on Vancouver's pick #7: http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/flyers/485702611.html Will Hextall try to move up in the draft to, say, No. 7 overall, a pick that Vancouver is reportedly dangling? At No. 7, he would have a chance to get a player with a higher upside than at 14. Among the desirable players expected to be there at No.7 are centers Barrett Hayton (Frost’s teammate in juniors) and Jesperi Kotkaniemi, and righthanded defensemen such as Noah Dobson, Evan Bouchard and Adam Boqvist. Hextall might have to deal Nos. 14 and 19 to get to No. 7. Or perhaps trading No. 14 and a player such as Nic Aube-Kubel, a speedy Phantoms winger who has a chance to make the Flyers at training camp, would get it done. Considering Benning is better at getting good players with later picks and not as good with top 10 picks, it might be worth it to look depending on who is still available when its the canucks turn to pick. If there is someone the Flyers really want there it might be possible to get 14, 19, and another asset actually. I doubt the Flyers would do it though. Worth checking out for Benning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldoescobar Posted June 19, 2018 Share Posted June 19, 2018 50th + McDonald for Tanev is probably what would be offered which is obviously a non starter. Like others have stated I think the 7th overall would be the primary target. They would take Tanev imo but only below market value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.