Pears Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 I’ve always thought Simmonds would be the perfect player to have here. Would love to acquire him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HerrDrFunk Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 I like Simmonds a lot....but I don't think he'd be a good fit for the Canucks right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roberts Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 doesn't sound very convincing from the sportsnet's source.. Quote According to The Athletic’s Michael Russo, “the Flyers are gearing to potentially trade” the veteran forward Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noble 6 Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 Time for Calgary to give up their 2019 1st. Gotta stick with whatever that plan is Burke. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIC_CITY Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 Agreed but that was the move to make 3 years ago. No sense giving up futures for him at this point. This is Phili maximizing their asset, like we probably should have done with Tanev a year or two ago. Simmonds is a great player. A contender will probably cough up a 1st round pick for him. Either that or a 2nd and a good prospect. But as a Canucks fan, I don't want to give up futures for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted June 20, 2018 Author Share Posted June 20, 2018 2 minutes ago, VIC_CITY said: Agreed but that was the move to make 3 years ago. No sense giving up futures for him at this point. This is Phili maximizing their asset, like we probably should have done with Tanev a year or two ago. Simmonds is a great player. A contender will probably cough up a 1st round pick for him. Either that or a 2nd and a good prospect. But as a Canucks fan, I don't want to give up futures for him. Agreed about not giving up futures, but what about a deal based around Simmonds and Tanev? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaku Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 5 minutes ago, Horvat is a Boss said: Time for Calgary to give up their 2019 1st. Gotta stick with whatever that plan is Burke. Hate to break it to ya. Burke left the Flames organization like 2 months ago. I love the way Simmonds plays the game. Tough, hard checking, nice shot, decent skater and works hard. If the price is right... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Provost Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 Don’t see how he isn’t worth more than we should pay for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Where'd Luongo? Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 He would have been perfect for the Sedins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LegionOfDoom Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 Gadj will bring everything simmonds does when it’s time to matter. Unless sanheim is part of a deal I’m happy with the way our rebuild is going Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIC_CITY Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 1 minute ago, Pears said: Agreed about not giving up futures, but what about a deal based around Simmonds and Tanev? Intersting. But if Tanev is going out, we need some another defenseman coming back. Edler's a free agent after this year. The rest of our D are borderline 2nd/3rd pairing guys. We really don't what we're going to get out of them. Maybe One of Stetcher/Hutton becomes a legit top 4 dman and maybe the other ends up out of the league in 2 years? Juolevi is a wild card. Hopefully he impresses but he's not someone you can count on at this point. So I just don't see JB trading Tanev without having a replacement. But once a couple of Stetcher, Hutton, Gudbranson, Juolevi, Pouliot (Tryamkin?!) have breakout seasons, or if another GM offers up a young defenseman, I expect Benning to pull the trigger. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted June 20, 2018 Author Share Posted June 20, 2018 3 minutes ago, VIC_CITY said: Intersting. But if Tanev is going out, we need some another defenseman coming back. Edler's a free agent after this year. The rest of our D are borderline 2nd/3rd pairing guys. We really don't what we're going to get out of them. Maybe One of Stetcher/Hutton becomes a legit top 4 dman and maybe the other ends up out of the league in 2 years? Juolevi is a wild card. Hopefully he impresses but he's not someone you can count on at this point. So I just don't see JB trading Tanev without having a replacement. But once a couple of Stetcher, Hutton, Gudbranson, Juolevi, Pouliot (Tryamkin?!) have breakout seasons, or if another GM offers up a young defenseman, I expect Benning to pull the trigger. What about something like this? Tanev, Goldobin and a 3rd for Simmonds and Hägg? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 Simmonds, 19OA for Panarin? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIC_CITY Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 17 minutes ago, Horvat is a Boss said: Time for Calgary to give up their 2019 1st. Gotta stick with whatever that plan is Burke. Didn't he step down from his position with the Flames and started working with HNIC? I'm pretty sure he's on stand by for when Don Cherry inevitably goes into cardiac arrest on Coaches Corner. They'll just quickly cut his hair and slide him right into Don's suit. No one will even notice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silky mitts Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 Doesn’t make sense for our timeline. Hell of a player though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b3. Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 I always thought he would have been an awesome line mate for the twins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.V.'s slurp Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 13 minutes ago, VIC_CITY said: Didn't he step down from his position with the Flames and started working with HNIC? I'm pretty sure he's on stand by for when Don Cherry inevitably goes into cardiac arrest on Coaches Corner. They'll just quickly cut his hair and slide him right into Don's suit. No one will even notice The question is: will they make him actually tie his tie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Master Mind Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 Simmonds + for Panarin. Torts would love him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VIC_CITY Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 12 minutes ago, Pears said: What about something like this? Tanev, Goldobin and a 3rd for Simmonds and Hägg? I don't know much about Hägg. How likely is he to be a 2nd pairing guy? Goldobin and a 3rd are both decent assets and I wouldn't want to give up anything of value for a defenseman that could very well end up being a 5 or 6. We have that in spades. So...do you vouch for Hägg? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted June 20, 2018 Share Posted June 20, 2018 Tanev for him straight up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.