Rollieo Del Fuego Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 30 minutes ago, Pepe Silvia said: What does pride have to do with it? Doesnt matter where he's from, his point was correct and I'll back that. I haven't bothered to read through the last 3 pages of useless arguments. Who cares. What point was correct? He attacked my intellect and my persona....how is that correct...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucksnihilist Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 People with weak arguments and insecurities about themselves often attack the person they are debating with, instead of presenting a logical argument. Look at Donald Trump, a perfect example. It's called Ad Hominem argumentation. It used to be a faux-paux back in the day when honour was worth something, but now it is just a common tactic. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SabreFan1 Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 5 hours ago, Kanukfanatic said: Sounds like trump the deluded. Good for you!! 5 hours ago, Kanukfanatic said: You have issues when you think you are intelligent as an anonymous poster but other anonymous posters are not. (block) 5 hours ago, Kanukfanatic said: You post like trump would. You probably voted for that windbag, lying, pathetic human being. It is funny watching the good ole usa go from a respected nation to bottom of the heap. The guy is absolutely pathetic and you post with the same arrogance and idiocy he talks with. Congratulations! You made something of yourself in good ole buffalo. 3 hours ago, Rollieo Del Fuego said: This is hilarious....no hockey talk just english lesson's by an American donkey's ass that doesn't realize other countries have different english than the States... It is English after all and that is from England...not the U.S of Asses... This is the Canucks forum and there are more people coming to the aid of a Sabre's fan than running him out of here. Have some pride people...! Holy crap. How many alt accounts do you have? I'm beginning to wonder if I'm the only person on CDC who only has a single account registered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SabreFan1 Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 2 hours ago, Rollieo Del Fuego said: What point was correct? He attacked my intellect and my persona....how is that correct...? He's talking about why I originally posted in this thread. You know, the actual subject we all were originally discussing. I came here to talk about the players, not to argue with children. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SabreFan1 Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 8 hours ago, J-23 said: Wow, LOL. What did I just read... You originally quoted me on something before your edit. Why did you continue reading the posts of me arguing with children? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGuardian_ Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 Well even though the subject of the thread is ridiculous lets try to get back on topic. There is, at this time, no comparison between the two players in the NHL. IMO Hughes requires the Canucks play him with a player that is physical, can clear the front of the net or win the board battles. All the talk is about when he/they have the puck, but which player can get the puck easier? Physically, Dahlin is larger and stronger. Dahlin played in a profession league and players playing for contracts, Hughes played in what is essentially a development league. Dahlin is compared to the very best dmen over the last 20 years in the NHL. Hughes doesn't really have a cotemporary. Height - with the tenancy of teams to inflate to the next inch - Dahlin 6'2", Hughes - 5' 9" Weight - Dahlin - 185 lbs, lean for his height Hughes - 170 lbs - should look ripped with "guns" Remember when posters were putting Julievi on the pedestal as the next one, next year, then next year, then the next year, then …. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boudrias Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 2 hours ago, canucksnihilist said: People with weak arguments and insecurities about themselves often attack the person they are debating with, instead of presenting a logical argument. Look at Donald Trump, a perfect example. It's called Ad Hominem argumentation. It used to be a faux-paux back in the day when honour was worth something, but now it is just a common tactic. That sounds like fake rationalization to me! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-23 Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 (edited) 1 hour ago, SabreFan1 said: You originally quoted me on something before your edit. Why did you continue reading the posts of me arguing with children? I changed my mind after reading more... Edited July 18, 2018 by J-23 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SabreFan1 Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, Boudrias said: That sounds like fake rationalization to me! Tell me about it. I didn't bother responding to his post because proving that Dahlin is the better prospect is easy. My arguments were rational to everyone but the most ardent of homers. Then the children chimed in and didn't like getting picked on after having their lack of awareness and intelligence pointed out to them. Not just by me, but I'm usually game enough to argue and bicker back if I have the time available. Edited July 18, 2018 by SabreFan1 added the word "having". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SabreFan1 Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 40 minutes ago, J-23 said: I changed my mind after reading more... I didn't catch the quote anyways, just the notification of it. I'm just surprised people are continuing to read the posts of me arguing with children. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GB5 Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 23 hours ago, SabreFan1 said: Shameless reputation fishing. Yup, just got my first one None the less, I stand by my comments that any Canuck player is better than anyone else. I'm kind of a "da' Bears Bill Schwartski" kind of guy. 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SabreFan1 Posted July 18, 2018 Share Posted July 18, 2018 8 minutes ago, GarthButcher5 said: Yup, just got my first one None the less, I stand by my comments that any Canuck player is better than anyone else. I'm kind of a "da' Bears Bill Schwartski" kind of guy. You're completely shameless! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaudette Celly Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 6 hours ago, TheGuardian_ said: Well even though the subject of the thread is ridiculous lets try to get back on topic. Behold, the voice of reason... ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucksnihilist Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 6 hours ago, Boudrias said: That sounds like fake rationalization to me! Do mean it is fake rationalization because you don't think ad hominum exists? Or do you mean its employment is a fake rationalization and can be used to mean anything is OK? That you actually agree with its use? In any case, not sure what you are referring to. I'm not in favour of anything except hockey talk here, and if people are using this forum for anything else they should be kicked. I don't believe in bigotry of any sort, including racism - which someone has alluded to here in this topic. I am in no way defending said posts, just trying to explain how that in a world full of idiots you can expect most things to be idiotic. too much self interest really... whatever story people can tell themselves to make themselves feel good is the one that they stick to, regardless of truth. denial trumps sports as the favourite pastime of humanity (haha made a pun there) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 1 minute ago, canucksnihilist said: Do mean it is fake rationalization because you don't think ad hominum exists? Or do you mean its employment is a fake rationalization and can be used to mean anything is OK? That you actually agree with its use? In any case, not sure what you are referring to. I'm not in favour of anything except hockey talk here, and if people are using this forum for anything else they should be kicked. I don't believe in bigotry of any sort, including racism - which someone has alluded to here in this topic. I am in no way defending said posts, just trying to explain how that in a world full of idiots you can expect most things to be idiotic. too much self interest really... whatever story people can tell themselves to make themselves feel good is the one that they stick to, regardless of truth. denial trumps sports as the favourite pastime of humanity (haha made a pun there) Totally agree. Still Quinn Hughes will prove to be the superior player to Dahlin. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canucksnihilist Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 1 minute ago, Alflives said: Totally agree. Still Quinn Hughes will prove to be the superior player to Dahlin. I don't know man, Dahlin is supposedly quite the player... Pundits calling him the Conor McDavid of defense, et all. You don't get those kinds of accolades without good cause... I think Quinn Hughes could be a Neidermeyer-level player if things really work out - I am really looking forward to seeing how he does! But he isn't going to be a Bobby Orr-level player. And guess what, I think all of us would be ecstatic about that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coastal.view Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 10 hours ago, Rollieo Del Fuego said: What point was correct? He attacked my intellect and my persona....how is that correct...? oh really you might wish to reread your first post to him? short memory syndrome there ?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldoescobar Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 I like Hughes and Dahlin because they are good guys at hockey. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rollieo Del Fuego Posted July 19, 2018 Share Posted July 19, 2018 There was a time when English cops were frowned upon around here... NOW it's okay to be a condescending A-hole I guess... Quinn will surpass Dahlin in 2 years time.... Just watch....! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iceman64 Posted July 28, 2018 Share Posted July 28, 2018 On 7/11/2018 at 8:32 PM, HerrDrFunk said: Of course we are. we're bored... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now