Sign in to follow this  
CanucksCountry

[Proposal] What the team should look like next year

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, D-Money said:

Eriksson for Backes would make some sense. Exact same cap hit. Eriksson is the better player now, but Backes expires 1 year earlier (perfect timing).

 

DB has an NMC that becomes a LNTC July 1st, so he'd have to be open to it. But right now he's had to resort to putting his health on the line to stay relevant on Cassidy's team. And back in the day, Backes signed an offer sheet to come to Vancouver, so he at least at one point wanted to come here.

 

The Bruins already have a pretty good penalty-kill (9th overall), but they have to get through Tampa, who have the top PP and PK in the league. They'd probably listen to this.

Look what we got for Hansen & Burrows.

 

At $3 mill, surely there is some value in Eriksson?

 

I hope...  :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/12/2019 at 6:08 PM, RetroCanuck said:

Not much of a proposal.

 

I propose we win the lottery, draft Kakko and then trade our second+Sutter for hughes....

2nd + Sutter for a potential generational talent ?

Whats even better then, is lets trade Granny + 2nd R + Sautner for Crosby. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, canuckistani said:

2nd + Sutter for a potential generational talent ?

Whats even better then, is lets trade Granny + 2nd R + Sautner for Crosby. 

You clearly missed the massive amount of sarcasm within my comment

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, RetroCanuck said:

You clearly missed the massive amount of sarcasm within my comment

i did. not easy to tell on CDC which is sarcastic and which is nonsense. We have posters here who think Dahlin will be a bust and is already a bust. Thanks for clarifying.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

1) Goldobin-Pettersson-Virtanen.  

 

The two players that are closest to “breaking out” are Goldobin and Virtanen.  Who better than to help these guys get to the next level than our best player?

 

2) Pearson-Horvat-Boeser

 

Pearson moves the 2nd line and plays with players that complement his style (and skating) a little more.

 

3) Baertschi-Gaudette-Leivo

 

Gaudette plays with two guys that have a half decent ability to put the puck in the net.

 

4) Roussel-Beagle-Motte

 

 

1) Edler-Stecher

 

keep this successful pairing intact.

 

 

2) Hughes-Tanev

 

Tanev mentors Hughes and helps him get up to speed.  I don’t think this will take very long. Less than one year.  

 

3) Gardiner-Myers

 

Gardienr and Myers are NOT world beaters and both players have their fair share of warts and injury histories.  Here’s what both players will offer us however.......very good depth.

 

With this defense, the Canucks should have enough depth to stay afloat when the injury bug hits.  Injuries and subsequent depth exposure has been this teams’ number one problem in my opinion.  This problem should be averted with a co-signing of Gardiner and Myers.

 

1) Markstrom

 

2) Demko

Edited by Hindustan Smyl

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.