stawns Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 1 minute ago, Elias Pettersson said: So the last time we picked #10 we selected... Cody Hodgson Bit Bourdon before that, who was shaping up to be a legit #1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jack Fig Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 Jim will just have to get creative to trade up and get Byram. No biggie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fanfor42 Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 Luc Bourdon was 10th. He was going to be a really good player and he was a really good guy. Burrows sent arrows up to him with every goal. We're gonna get a very special player at 10. That's the Canuck way. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 1 minute ago, cdubuya said: The last time we picked 10th we had GMMG drafting So true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanukfanatic Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 2 minutes ago, Coconuts said: Honestly, I'd be fine with trading down and acquiring more picks. We're not flush enough depthwise to give up what it'd take for a top 3 pick. This is pretty much the first post that makes sense in relation to trading the Canucks 1st rounder. However, it all depends on whether JB thinks he can get a much better player at 10 then lower (say 15th). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bure2Win Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 Oh don't worry guys we'll get a great player at tenth spot...........Oh wait. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 1 minute ago, SabreFan1 said: The drawing isn't broadcast live on Sportsnet by the looks of it. The leaked image and video came from a Swedish webstream simulcasting it with a satellite company. It's all a Swedish conspiracy! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apricot Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 I....sad 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlastPast Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 9 minutes ago, Raspberries said: Oh really? It is carried out in complete secrecy and the benefactors are all major market US teams. No one can say it isn't rigged when there is nothing to say it is in any way legitimate. Secrecy from the public but no doubt it will be overseen ,supervised and maybe even conducted by a contracted third party. Like how Pricewaterhousecooper tally the votes for the Academy Awards. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TNucks1 Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 1 minute ago, Jack Fig said: Jim will just have to get creative to trade up and get Byram. No biggie. that'd be nice if its not over the top. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucker 67 Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 Gary`s going to get Booed real bad at the Draft. Real bad. That list of former 10th OAs doesn't look great. Not terrible, but no game-changers. Sad to see Bourdon`s name there. The Hockey God`s (pfft) But, here we are. At least it`s not 12th. And at least it`s not EDM or ANA or LA. There could still be a great player at 10. Maybe Dach or Krebs slip through? If not them, maybe Boldy or Zegras? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanukfanatic Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 Just now, fanfor42 said: Luc Bourdon was 10th. He was going to be a really good player and he was a really good guy. Burrows sent arrows up to him with every goal. We're gonna get a very special player at 10. That's the Canuck way. Cody sucked...letz hope for better. I doubt JB does worse that MG did haha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VforVasili Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 Disappointed in 10th but glad this draft may be the final nail in the coffin for tanking as two teams jumped into the top three. I would prefer a lottery weighted toward toward the best record after teams are eliminated from playoff contention. Sick of meaningless games to end the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fakename70 Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 My phone isn’t on when I’m working, so, I’m just now seeing what went down today. Threw my arms up in disgust, but certainly not disbelief. I expected it. How can ya not? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
surtur Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 Well... it could have been worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coconuts Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 Just now, Kanukfanatic said: This is pretty much the first post that makes sense in relation to trading the Canucks 1st rounder. However, it all depends on whether JB thinks he can get a much better player at 10 then lower (say 15th). I don't think he'd drop too much lower but for say an additional second round pick to drop a little? I could live with dropping. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobSacamano Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 I was worried about Jack going to a place where Quinn might want to follow one day... maybe Jack will want to come here. Better than Jersey, that’s for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stawns Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 7 minutes ago, WalkWithElias40 said: Boldy or trade our first Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gnarcore Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 12 minutes ago, Jester13 said: Tanev, Jake, 10th for 1st Would take more. Throw in Goldy, a D prospect and our 2nd round pick and maybe we could get one of those top 3 picks. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brian42 Posted April 10, 2019 Share Posted April 10, 2019 Wouldn’t be against trading the pick but instead of trying to land a top 3 pick which we’d likley have to overpay for just get a proven player. Maybe a package the 10th with other assets for Brayden Point or Marner who will be hard for TO or Tampa to afford. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now