Sign in to follow this  
Provost

[Report] Eriksson “NOT” likely to be moved on

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, King Heffy said:

You know what?  You convinced me with that right that a lazy, soft crybaby who can't score, won't hit, and whines about the coach belongs in an NHL lineup.  Clearly LE's stellar play over his tenure here warrants Greeen allowing him to float around like a circus seal.

Pretty sure circus seals get applauded though.. maybe a dandelion?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, timberz21 said:

This rumor dates back pre-draft and there hasn't been any new report since.  Can we close this topics now?  158 pages is ridiculous and honestly a giant waste of time for a guy like LE.  Let's start a new topic when/if new speculations start again, which I doubt it will.  We're stuck with him #endofdiscussion.

Think I asked for this a while ago as well. Thread is long past being becoming worthless. 

Edited by N7Nucks
  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Safe to reach a conclusion now... Eriksson is going nowhere!!! The owner doesn't want to see his $ go down the drain so to save face, he ordered JB * the coaching staff to keep Eriksson alive on the roster. The only chance he'll get traded is if we were to offer something ridiculous to this other team who's happy to buy out his remaining contract term.

 

Anyhow, be prepared to see Eriksson taking Gaudette or Motte's spot when everyone's healthy!! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, 189lb enforcers? said:

Today, LE is a good problem to have. 

Yes, too many on this forum just want to get rid of players when we finally got some depth. 

Capwise Louis contract has made Bennings life easier. 

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, N7Nucks said:

Think I asked for this a while ago as well. Thread is long past being becoming worthless. 

Yup, me too.  I said to close this topic in August and got rammed because apparently between august and september, there was "plenty of time" and would 100% get moved by training camp...

 

If I had time to waste I'd search back to these comments and posts them here, but I don't unfortunately.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Timråfan said:

Yes, too many on this forum just want to get rid of players when we finally got some depth. 

Capwise Louis contract has made Bennings life easier. 

Lets not get carried away, if we could dump Loui and his cap in it's entirety without using picks I imagine the team would do it in a heart beat. 6mil on a 4th liner/depth player is not what I'd consider making life easy on the team. Loui has been better but his contract is still god awful and it's the reason this "report" never came to fruition. Loui is here to stay, shut the thread down I say, let the man play. #Bars

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No one ever talks about the few pros of having the bad contract...  it does actually allow for better depth in the system as you can have a Baertschi Goldy Eriksson pass thru waivers, and still have NHL player depth ready when injuries strike.  Not only that, but you have options for specific roles now that Green can deploy...   its honestly a fantastic accumulation of solid role players...  and its what gives Vancouver Calgary and Arizona the edge over Edmonton and Anaheim after all 82 get played. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, 70seven said:

No one ever talks about the few pros of having the bad contract...  it does actually allow for better depth in the system as you can have a Baertschi Goldy Eriksson pass thru waivers, and still have NHL player depth ready when injuries strike.  Not only that, but you have options for specific roles now that Green can deploy...   its honestly a fantastic accumulation of solid role players...  and its what gives Vancouver Calgary and Arizona the edge over Edmonton and Anaheim after all 82 get played. 

There are no pros to having a bad contract, that is why they are called bad contracts. It does not "help" with depth in anyway.

Sven and Goldy would have passed through waivers even if Loui was being paid $2 mill per.

  • Hydration 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Timråfan said:

Yes, too many on this forum just want to get rid of players when we finally got some depth. 

Capwise Louis contract has made Bennings life easier. 

How has LE's contract made Bennings life easier ???????

  • Hydration 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Benning would be better off paying me $500,000 per, I skate like Lucic fight like Malkin and hit like a Mac burger but would still help more than LE.

  • Hydration 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, crobar said:

How has LE's contract made Bennings life easier ???????

Benning use it as leverage to force players into team friendly contracts, Boeser, Edler etc... :bigblush:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Timråfan said:

Benning use it as leverage to force players into team friendly contracts, Boeser, Edler etc... :bigblush:

How about some PROOF instead of POOF

  • Hydration 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, crobar said:

How about some PROOF instead of POOF

All right.. How many presents proof on this forum. I thought the most is suggestions or opinions. 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, crobar said:

How about some PROOF instead of POOF

Nah he prefers poof, save your self some hassle and time - blocking is easy!:metal:

  • Hydration 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread should remain open, LE is still a Canuck. We have a Burrows do we really need him thread still active, yet the guy was traded from us a while ago and has since retired. That is a pointless thread since the player is retired. But CDC has that love affair for Burr so it stays open.

 

This thread just needs a title change

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.