morrissex95 Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 To Vancouver: C Alex Wennberg To Columbus: LW Loui Eriksson Reason: Wennberg isn't fitting into Tortorella's system and needs a fresh start. Eriksson is more of a serviceable player for Columbus. No salary retained. Wennberg slots in as our 3C. He's more of a offensive player but Pettersson and Horvat's strong two-way play makes up for Wennberg. __________________________________ To Vancouver: RW Jesse Puljujarvi C Kyle Broadziak To Edmonton: LW Sven Baertschi VAN 3rd 2020 Reason: I think Puljujarvi is a star in the making. Edmonton has a horrible player development program. We can send Broadziak to Utica where he can slot in as their 2C. Baertschi is good but we have a surplus of wingers like him and Puljujarvi is a potential star power forward who I would compare to Todd Bertuzzi. _______________________________ To Vancouver: TOR 3rd 2020 To Colorado: C Brandon Sutter Reason: Colorado gets a good defensive player to take on some tough minutes for MacKinnon and Kadri. Tyson Jost can develop better as a winger for Sutter. Vancouver clears more cap space for Boeser __________________________ Vancouver Canucks sign RW Brock Boeser to a 8 year $60 Million contract($7.5 Million AAV) LINES JT Miller-Elias Pettersson-Brock Boeser Tanner Pearson-Bo Horvat-Jesse Puljujarvi Michael Ferland-Alex Wennberg-Jake Virtanen Antoine Roussel-Jay Beagle-Josh Leivo Tyler Motte Nikolay Goldobin Alex Edler-Troy Stecher Quinn Hughes-Tyler Myers Jordie Benn-Chris Tanev Jacob Markstrom Thatcher Demko 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 Nicely done. What’s keeping JB? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Gurn Posted September 2, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted September 2, 2019 4 minutes ago, Alflives said: Nicely done. What’s keeping JB? Reality? No retention on Loui seems a bit way out there. 1 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nux_win Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 25 minutes ago, morrissex95 said: To Vancouver: C Alex Wennberg To Columbus: LW Loui Eriksson Reason: Wennberg isn't fitting into Tortorella's system and needs a fresh start. Eriksson is more of a serviceable player for Columbus. No salary retained. Wennberg slots in as our 3C. He's more of a offensive player but Pettersson and Horvat's strong two-way play makes up for Wennberg. __________________________________ To Vancouver: RW Jesse Puljujarvi C Kyle Broadziak To Edmonton: LW Sven Baertschi VAN 3rd 2020 Reason: I think Puljujarvi is a star in the making. Edmonton has a horrible player development program. We can send Broadziak to Utica where he can slot in as their 2C. Baertschi is good but we have a surplus of wingers like him and Puljujarvi is a potential star power forward who I would compare to Todd Bertuzzi. _______________________________ To Vancouver: TOR 3rd 2020 To Colorado: C Brandon Sutter Reason: Colorado gets a good defensive player to take on some tough minutes for MacKinnon and Kadri. Tyson Jost can develop better as a winger for Sutter. Vancouver clears more cap space for Boeser __________________________ Vancouver Canucks sign RW Brock Boeser to a 8 year $60 Million contract($7.5 Million AAV) LINES JT Miller-Elias Pettersson-Brock Boeser Tanner Pearson-Bo Horvat-Jesse Puljujarvi Michael Ferland-Alex Wennberg-Jake Virtanen Antoine Roussel-Jay Beagle-Josh Leivo Tyler Motte Nikolay Goldobin Alex Edler-Troy Stecher Quinn Hughes-Tyler Myers Jordie Benn-Chris Tanev Jacob Markstrom Thatcher Demko I'd go for that, but I doubt the other teams involved would. Go Canucks Go! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrissex95 Posted September 2, 2019 Author Share Posted September 2, 2019 26 minutes ago, gurn said: Reality? No retention on Loui seems a bit way out there. Keep in mind Wennberg is on a longer contract than Loui 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JM_ Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 34 minutes ago, morrissex95 said: To Vancouver: C Alex Wennberg To Columbus: LW Loui Eriksson Reason: Wennberg isn't fitting into Tortorella's system and needs a fresh start. Eriksson is more of a serviceable player for Columbus. No salary retained. Wennberg slots in as our 3C. He's more of a offensive player but Pettersson and Horvat's strong two-way play makes up for Wennberg. I like this one, and it has the most likelihood but I think we'd have to add a pick and/or retain salary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurn Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 9 minutes ago, morrissex95 said: Keep in mind Wennberg is on a longer contract than Loui True, but he is younger and plays center. Had a very good year a couple back with 59 points. I don't mind the idea but as Jimmy said, I think it would take more, be it retained cap or whatever. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pears Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 16 minutes ago, Jimmy McGill said: I like this one, and it has the most likelihood but I think we'd have to add a pick and/or retain salary. My thoughts exactly. I do like it otherwise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrissex95 Posted September 2, 2019 Author Share Posted September 2, 2019 1 minute ago, gurn said: True, but he is younger and plays center. Had a very good year a couple back with 59 points. I don't mind the idea but as Jimmy said, I think it would take more, be it retained cap or whatever. Maybe a pick or a prospect or something? How about Goldobin? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurn Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 9 minutes ago, morrissex95 said: Maybe a pick or a prospect or something? How about Goldobin? Columbus might want a center prospect instead, maybe Gaudette and Loui for Wennberg. If the Canucks do end up with Wennberg they'll need to move Suter or Beagle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrissex95 Posted September 2, 2019 Author Share Posted September 2, 2019 1 minute ago, gurn said: Columbus might want a center prospect instead, maybe Gaudette and Loui for Wennberg. If the Canucks do end up with Wennberg they'll need to move Suter or Beagle. They could shift Wennberg to the wing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurn Posted September 2, 2019 Share Posted September 2, 2019 8 minutes ago, morrissex95 said: They could shift Wennberg to the wing. Could do. Don't know if he has played there or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrissex95 Posted September 3, 2019 Author Share Posted September 3, 2019 24 minutes ago, gurn said: Could do. Don't know if he has played there or not. I think he did in Sweden. it's a lot easier for a centre to shift to wing than a winger shifting to centre like Drouin in Montreal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 Loui Eriksson gone without paying a draft pick OR retaining cap? Is NHL 20 out already and did they make it even easier to make trades in it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrissex95 Posted September 3, 2019 Author Share Posted September 3, 2019 1 minute ago, N7Nucks said: Loui Eriksson gone without paying a draft pick OR retaining cap? Is NHL 20 out already and did they make it even easier to make trades in it? I don't think you realize what an albatross that Wennberg contract is bud 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 Even Wennberg's contract is $1.1 cheaper than Eriksson's, has no clauses and no signing bonuses. Despite his performance, his contract is much less egregious. We have to retain on the first deal or add more. I say no the second deal because I'm not sold on Puljujarvi and Baertschi is a proven low-end top six forward. The third deal is the closest, but I don't think Sutter quite has that value yet. Maybe if he starts the year off strong. Either way, I'd rather keep him, because Gaudette is not NHL-ready. Given your other trades, we have options, but taking your trade on it's own, it leaves us with Gaudette as a 3 or 4C in the NHL. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
morrissex95 Posted September 3, 2019 Author Share Posted September 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, -AJ- said: Even Wennberg's contract is $1.1 cheaper than Eriksson's, has no clauses and no signing bonuses. Despite his performance, his contract is much less egregious. We have to retain on the first deal or add more. I say no the second deal because I'm not sold on Puljujarvi and Baertschi is a proven low-end top six forward. The third deal is the closest, but I don't think Sutter quite has that value yet. Maybe if he starts the year off strong. Either way, I'd rather keep him, because Gaudette is not NHL-ready. Given your other trades, we have options, but taking your trade on it's own, it leaves us with Gaudette as a 3 or 4C in the NHL. Maybe retain 18.3% of Eriksson's salary to bring his cap hit down to $4.9 Million. We don't save any cap room but Wennberg is a much more promising player than Eriksson. If Wennberg turns his play around we could potentially trade him next summer for some futures. Puljujarvi is a star in the making who's being ruined by the Oilers terrible development staff. Obviously Ken Holland will be able to improve the Oilers development staff but Puljujarvi at this point needs a fresh start with a new organization. I think he would do really well on a line with Pearson and Horvat. I really think we need to do what we can to get rid of Sutter because he just isn't performing with our team 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 16 minutes ago, morrissex95 said: I don't think you realize what an albatross that Wennberg contract is bud If it’s so nasty why do we trade for him? Loui is very likely going to retire, so he’d be completely off the books. Could Wennberg help us though? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alflives Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 1 minute ago, morrissex95 said: Maybe retain 18.3% of Eriksson's salary to bring his cap hit down to $4.9 Million. We don't save any cap room but Wennberg is a much more promising player than Eriksson. If Wennberg turns his play around we could potentially trade him next summer for some futures. Puljujarvi is a star in the making who's being ruined by the Oilers terrible development staff. Obviously Ken Holland will be able to improve the Oilers development staff but Puljujarvi at this point needs a fresh start with a new organization. I think he would do really well on a line with Pearson and Horvat. I really think we need to do what we can to get rid of Sutter because he just isn't performing with our team Would you trade Jake for JP? I know Jake is an NHL player, but couldn’t JP play on our third line with Sutter and Baer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KKnight Posted September 3, 2019 Share Posted September 3, 2019 18 minutes ago, Alflives said: If it’s so nasty why do we trade for him? Loui is very likely going to retire, so he’d be completely off the books. Could Wennberg help us though? If Loui retires that would help us hugely for next offseason. I hope we trade for josh anderson would become available. Miller - Bo - Anderson, would be an absolute pain in the ass for opposition. I also hope we go after Reaves. Miller - Pete - Boeser Pearson - Bo - Anderson Ferland - Gauds - Virtanen Roussel - Beagle - Reaves The following year Podkolzin and Hoglander get inserted in the lineup. Good mix of skill, toughness and two way play. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now