Sign in to follow this  
-Vintage Canuck-

[Official] 2019 Training Camp Thread

Rate this topic

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, aGENT said:

Sure.... but I don't see them waiving him.

Hopefully for him they find a trade partner rather than just keep him as extra F.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, aGENT said:

Eriksson/Schaller? Longer shot of Baer/Motte? Can't see them waiving any other vets.

if you're forced to put a guy on waivers that you wouldn't have expected to, especially if it's not a young player

 

why not someone you wouldn't expect. :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, aGENT said:

Eriksson/Schaller? Longer shot of Baer/Motte? Can't see them waiving any other vets.

I don't think the Canucks would be sad to lose Eriksson Schaller on waivers.

 

IMO it's more Baer or Motte or Goldy

Edited by timberz21

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Gassy Jack said:

Waive Baer? 

Boys with new toys... you guys think Leivo and Pearson are1st/2nd liners? Theres a reason they were in the doghouse and we got them for cheap... I would be happy if they can keep it up, but I'm not sold. Neither has a higher ceiling than Baer

Media has been running with that for several days now from being around the team.  

 

Fwiw an Edmonton radio host was saying already in the middle of the summer that his sources tell him the Canucks had already ear-marked Baertschi to be waived.  

 

Edited by mll

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Bang Bang Boogie said:

Anyone know when the final cuts have to be made and when the final roster needs to be set?

they said on the broadcast last night that the deadline for final roster is next Tuesday

  • Hydration 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Canucks reduce pre-season roster by four players:

 

Quote

Vancouver, BC - Vancouver Canucks General Manager Jim Benning announced today that the club has reduced its preseason roster by four players.

 

The following players have been assigned to the Utica Comets:

  • MacEwen, Zack 
  • Chatfield, Jalen

The following players have been designated for assignment:

  • Bachman, Richard
  • Graovac, Tyler

https://www.nhl.com/canucks/news/canucks-roster/c-309525294

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, zombieksa said:

So Brizzy survives another round of cuts. Interesting.

He was a positive +/- player and had 2 points leading into last nights game. Makes me wonder if this is an opportunity for him to get more comfortable around the guys. 

 

Could see breezer in the NHL very soon as an extra D.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, zombieksa said:

So Brizzy survives another round of cuts. Interesting.

With Fantenberg injured and Brizzy being a left handed defender, it makes sense why he's still around. He'll be on the team until Fantenberg is ready to play.

  • Hydration 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Sean Monahan said:

What does ‘designated for assignment’ mean?

Believe it means he is designated to be assigned to Utica. Likely due to waivers

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Rush17 said:

Believe it means he is designated to be assigned to Utica. Likely due to waivers

Makes sense. Didn’t catch the waiver eligible vs waiver exempt part there. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Sean Monahan said:

What does ‘designated for assignment’ mean?

 

2 minutes ago, Rush17 said:

Believe it means he is designated to be assigned to Utica. Likely due to waivers

The following players have been designated for assignment:

  • Bachman, Richard
  • Graovac, Tyler

Ya they are both waiver or eligible. You have to designate if you want to send them down to waive them and keep them at the NHL if they clear 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Sean Monahan said:

Makes sense. Didn’t catch the waiver eligible vs waiver exempt part there. 

I learned that part from our fantasy hockey on these forums lol. :lol:

 

Fun stuff

  • Hydration 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Comeback_Kings said:

Canucks should be gunning to win game one and ice the best roster they can.  This is where I'm at right now :

 

ferland   pettersson   boeser
baertschi   gaudette   miller
eriksson   horvat   sutter/pearson/leivo
virtanen  beagle  motte


keep :  goldobin (skill), schaller (checking, speed)

trade for futures any/all of :  sutter, leivo, pearson


 

you wanna keep goldy schaller and ericsson    over sutter pearson and leivo   , and then gaudette on the second line :picard:       the best roster they can ice   wont have goldy ericsson or schaller on the ice 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.