vannuck59 Posted March 7, 2020 Share Posted March 7, 2020 HA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raspberries Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 (edited) According to Brendan Batchelor's twitter Boeser on ice with team at this morning's practice. Full contact jersey. Edited March 8, 2020 by Raspberries 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yes we can nucks Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 57 minutes ago, Raspberries said: According to Brendan Batchelor's twitter Boeser on ice with team at this morning's practice. Full contact jersey. Wow, what a boost if we can get him back for the playoff push! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted March 8, 2020 Author Share Posted March 8, 2020 6 minutes ago, yes we can nucks said: Wow, what a boost if we can get him back for the playoff push! Can he push LoserSSon out of the top 6 tho...!?!? Be great to have him back, unfortunately pushes ZM out of the lineup as LoserSSon seems poised to stay in. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Duodenum Posted March 8, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted March 8, 2020 Jeff Paterson @patersonjeff · 34m #Canucks Boeser says he always felt he'd be back before end of regular season. Has been skating on his own for a while, but today was first day with group & contact. Says he's close 1 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yes we can nucks Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 17 minutes ago, Canuckster86 said: Can he push LoserSSon out of the top 6 tho...!?!? Be great to have him back, unfortunately pushes ZM out of the lineup as LoserSSon seems poised to stay in. Well, logic says Brock goes back on Horvat's line in place of Eriksson. Zack isn't going anywhere after his monster game. Eriksson is the weakest link. Maybe he's finally an unhealthy scratch...measles, hemorrhoids, bruised ego..? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Googlie Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 Utica would love to have BB on a conditioning stint - but is that now possible with frozen rosters? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Googlie Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 And Beezer was sent back to Utica yesterday (but not in time to make the game) so the roster room has been made available for BB's return to the Nux Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kloubek Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 24 minutes ago, yes we can nucks said: Well, logic says Brock goes back on Horvat's line Why does logic dictate that? I could see a couple reasons that doesn't happen: Green might prefer to ease Brock back in instead of putting him right in the fire. Remember that Boeser was playing on the 3rd before getting injured if I remember correctly. When we got TT, most assumed he would be put on our 2nd line to reunite with Pearson. I still think that is in the cards, with Boeser eventually going back to the 1st to be with his friend Petey. Really, I can see an argument to out Boeser on any of the top 3 lines when he comes back. I just hope he took this time to level himself and get his head back in the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurn Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 9 minutes ago, kloubek said: Remember that Boeser was playing on the 3rd before getting injured if I remember correctly. He was playing there before he was removed from the lineup, whether he was injured after being put on the third or before that is a bit uncertain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yes we can nucks Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 Just now, kloubek said: Why does logic dictate that? I could see a couple reasons that doesn't happen: Green might prefer to ease Brock back in instead of putting him right in the fire. Remember that Boeser was playing on the 3rd before getting injured if I remember correctly. When we got TT, most assumed he would be put on our 2nd line to reunite with Pearson. I still think that is in the cards, with Boeser eventually going back to the 1st to be with his friend Petey. Really, I can see an argument to out Boeser on any of the top 3 lines when he comes back. I just hope he took this time to level himself and get his head back in the game. To me, it's entirely logical that Brock slots in with Horvat. I'm not going to say that would be Green's logic. Toffoli is jelling nicely with Petterson and Miller. Why mess with it? The third line of Roussel, Gaudette, and Big Mac is showing great chemistry and had a dominating last game. Why mess with that? Ditto the fourth line with Virtanen becoming an impact player. As I said, Eriksson is the weakest link at right wing on the second line. Yeah, he's there for his defensive prowess. But with Brock there, the second line becomes a scoring threat again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grandmaster Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 1 hour ago, Duodenum said: Jeff Paterson @patersonjeff · 34m #Canucks Boeser says he always felt he'd be back before end of regular season. Has been skating on his own for a while, but today was first day with group & contact. Says he's close This is good news. For those that want to rid of LE from the lineup though need to keep in mind that the Canucks have blown too many games in the last 2 min. As much as I can’t stand LE, he is one of the top last 2 min defensive players on the team. I still laugh at his empty net expertise but learned to accept this beneficial role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VegasCanuck Posted March 8, 2020 Share Posted March 8, 2020 3 hours ago, Duodenum said: Jeff Paterson @patersonjeff · 34m #Canucks Boeser says he always felt he'd be back before end of regular season. Has been skating on his own for a while, but today was first day with group & contact. Says he's close Awesome news!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonoman Posted March 9, 2020 Share Posted March 9, 2020 5 hours ago, yes we can nucks said: Well, logic says Brock goes back on Horvat's line in place of Eriksson. Zack isn't going anywhere after his monster game. Eriksson is the weakest link. Maybe he's finally an unhealthy scratch...measles, hemorrhoids, bruised ego..? Would be nice but isn’t Mac an “emergency call up”? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knucklehd Posted March 9, 2020 Share Posted March 9, 2020 Wish we could get a Marky update. We are drowning without him. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted March 9, 2020 Share Posted March 9, 2020 8 hours ago, Knucklehd said: Wish we could get a Marky update. We are drowning without him. It's not him though. It's been 7 games since he went down. We've scored more than 3 goals only 2 times in that 7 game stretch. We won both games. In 4 of those 7 games we scored 2 or less goals. With him in the lineup we maybe go 3 and 4 instead of 2 and 5. Its offense issues. Not goaltending. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NHTyrany Posted March 9, 2020 Share Posted March 9, 2020 This team, the fans, all really need the postseason. I will continue to dream. The Nucks need to keep pushing, even harder. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bree2 Posted March 10, 2020 Share Posted March 10, 2020 why does cap friendly not show Markstrom on IR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grandmaster Posted March 10, 2020 Share Posted March 10, 2020 13 hours ago, 73 Percent said: It's not him though. It's been 7 games since he went down. We've scored more than 3 goals only 2 times in that 7 game stretch. We won both games. In 4 of those 7 games we scored 2 or less goals. With him in the lineup we maybe go 3 and 4 instead of 2 and 5. Its offense issues. Not goaltending. I would say no. Because Marky went down, the team has been trying to play defensive while giving up offensive opportunities. So far it’s been a huge failure. This team thrives on Marky’s ability to stop grade A chances while the players pinch in on offensive plays. I’m not so sure this is the best way to play but it was working. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now