DownUndaCanuck Posted October 27, 2019 Share Posted October 27, 2019 I think we could do it by sending one of our many young Utica forwards along too. For example, Leivo or Baertschi + Eriksson for a pick? I'd do Leivo + Eriksson + 3rd for a 2nd round pick and move Baertschi up into the lineup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WCE Posted October 27, 2019 Share Posted October 27, 2019 looking at Chicago 5 game loosing streak, I would consider To Chi Eriksson,Baertschi,Stecher & 4th rd 2021 To Van Seabrook & Ladd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GhostsOf1994 Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 2 hours ago, WCE said: looking at Chicago 5 game loosing streak, I would consider To Chi Eriksson,Baertschi,Stecher & 4th rd 2021 To Van Seabrook & Ladd Ladd is with the islanders, do you mean Saad? Seabrook"s contract is terrible and has 4 years left after this season. Saad 2 yr @ 6 Seabrook 5 yr @ 6.88 For Eriksson 3 yr @ 6 Baertschi 2 yr @ 3.66 Stecher 1 yr @ 2.33 I like Baertschi getting a fresh start, happy eriksson is gone, like adding Saad, dislike moving stecher for seabrook as a replacement. Though adding saad wouldn't give the canucks any flexibility as he replaces Eriksson roster spot. Saad would play in the top 9 preferably in the top 6. Pushing several players down the roster, with motte and leivo being scratched. Miller Pettersson Boeser Pearson Horvat Saad Ferland Gaudette Virtanen Roussel Beagle Sutter Motte Leivo I hope that a deal with eriksson will return player(s) on ltir and save a roster spot. Eriksson + Goldy for kesler? Gaborik, Callahan, MacArthur ? That said any eriksson trade will be a win unless roster players are the return, yes his cap hit sucks. With the available players to fill his spot and the flexibility is a win. Miller Pettersson Boeser Pearson Horvat Virtanen Ferland Gaudette Sutter Roussel Beagle Leivo Motte Edler Myers Hughes Tanev Benn Stecher Sautner Fantenberg With Juolevi, Goldobin Baertschi in the AHL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WCE Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 1 hour ago, GhostsOf1994 said: Ladd is with the islanders, do you mean Saad? Seabrook"s contract is terrible and has 4 years left after this season. Saad 2 yr @ 6 Seabrook 5 yr @ 6.88 For Eriksson 3 yr @ 6 Baertschi 2 yr @ 3.66 Stecher 1 yr @ 2.33 I like Baertschi getting a fresh start, happy eriksson is gone, like adding Saad, dislike moving stecher for seabrook as a replacement. Though adding saad wouldn't give the canucks any flexibility as he replaces Eriksson roster spot. Saad would play in the top 9 preferably in the top 6. Pushing several players down the roster, with motte and leivo being scratched. Miller Pettersson Boeser Pearson Horvat Saad Ferland Gaudette Virtanen Roussel Beagle Sutter Motte Leivo I hope that a deal with eriksson will return player(s) on ltir and save a roster spot. Eriksson + Goldy for kesler? Gaborik, Callahan, MacArthur ? That said any eriksson trade will be a win unless roster players are the return, yes his cap hit sucks. With the available players to fill his spot and the flexibility is a win. Miller Pettersson Boeser Pearson Horvat Virtanen Ferland Gaudette Sutter Roussel Beagle Leivo Motte Edler Myers Hughes Tanev Benn Stecher Sautner Fantenberg With Juolevi, Goldobin Baertschi in the AHL. yes I mean Saad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KKnight Posted October 28, 2019 Share Posted October 28, 2019 You think Erikssons contract is bad, until you look at Seabrooks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krzysl Posted October 29, 2019 Share Posted October 29, 2019 We could trade van Lou markstrum SJ martin Jones 1st overall 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted October 29, 2019 Share Posted October 29, 2019 1 hour ago, Krzysl said: We could trade van Lou markstrum SJ martin Jones 1st overall 2020 Lol. So much wrong with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Krzysl Posted October 29, 2019 Share Posted October 29, 2019 (edited) 36 minutes ago, qwijibo said: Lol. So much wrong with this. Why? Markstrom won’t get resigned next year, we don’t have the space for him. Martin Jones can get bought out and we get a cap hit of 2 mill fir the next 5 years. Jones can also bounce back perhaps with our goalie coach and get picked up by Seattle if he goes good. San Jose gets the goalie they need badly. Trade contract for contract. There is no easy way to lose Eriksson. This is an option. We can’t but out Lou because our cap relief ain’t worth it. Markstrom will want 5 mil per season minimum at 30 years old for probably 4 years no love clause. We will not sign him and will lose him for nothing. Edited October 29, 2019 by Krzysl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GhostsOf1994 Posted October 29, 2019 Share Posted October 29, 2019 5 hours ago, Krzysl said: Why? Markstrom won’t get resigned next year, we don’t have the space for him. Martin Jones can get bought out and we get a cap hit of 2 mill fir the next 5 years. Jones can also bounce back perhaps with our goalie coach and get picked up by Seattle if he goes good. San Jose gets the goalie they need badly. Trade contract for contract. There is no easy way to lose Eriksson. This is an option. We can’t but out Lou because our cap relief ain’t worth it. Markstrom will want 5 mil per season minimum at 30 years old for probably 4 years no love clause. We will not sign him and will lose him for nothing. 9.67 for marky and eriksson 5.75 for jones SJS have 20k in cap space Where does sjs pull 4 million out of? Throntons beard? Canucks won't sign markstrom before seattle expansion. If he does want to come back and be the #2 behind Demko until Dipietro/Kielly/Silovs become adequate back ups, I'm all for it. That said Markstrom won't be getting 5+m in Vancouver. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyndall2 Posted October 29, 2019 Share Posted October 29, 2019 Just be patient. The season is just getting started and teams are starting to get some major players injured. Keep playing the young guns and stick LE in from time to time until something unfolds. Don't throw away any draft picks. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
b18c85 Posted October 29, 2019 Share Posted October 29, 2019 Possible destination - Avalanche? Landeskog and Rantanen now confirmed out long term puts a gaping hole in their lineup and some cap relief Does this open up a spot for him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WCE Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 I'd look at the Sens they have draft picks but Eriksson, Marky, Schaller & Leivo Ryan,Anderson, & 1st rd 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 2 hours ago, WCE said: I'd look at the Sens they have draft picks but Eriksson, Marky, Schaller & Leivo Ryan,Anderson, & 1st rd 2020 That 1st is going to be top 5. You’re offering nothing of value to a rebuilding team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 On 10/29/2019 at 4:38 AM, GhostsOf1994 said: That said Markstrom won't be getting 5+m in Vancouver. JB is our GM, we are an improving team. I don't see JB NOT signing Marky unless he wants a super long term high $ contract. I like Demko, I want him to be the #1 G of our future as he the perfect age. Say we are ultra competitive for a cup in 4-6 years Marky will be mid 30s plus. Not many G are playing at an elite level at that age, sure you can name some Hall of Fame Goalies but Marky isn't one of them. I hope we give Demko a decent amount of games this year. If we role with Marky most of the time, its all but written in stone he is getting extended by us and the team sees him as the #1 guy. We then sit back and wait to see what we do for the expansion draft. Whatever JB does...do NOT give Markstrom a NMC!! Columbus has a lot of cap space to fit LE but would he waive to go there...Dubinsky or Wennberg would come back our way, we add definitely to get Wennberg. Or maybe Jenner? He is off to a slower start than Wennberg, maybe they move him and hope Wennberg can get more of his offensive game back. Boone Jenner for LE 40% Retained and we add something else Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
86Viking Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 Alzner for LE with retention? Same term left and if we eat some % to even the deal out maybe Montreal takes a flyer on LE? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted October 30, 2019 Share Posted October 30, 2019 25 minutes ago, Canuckster86 said: Alzner for LE with retention? Same term left and if we eat some % to even the deal out maybe Montreal takes a flyer on LE? I doubt Montreal would have any interest. Montreal already has too many bottom 6 forwards. Bergevin is also a fan of keeping extra defensemen around against injuries. They have a ton of cap space so having Alzner sit in the minors for $3.5m cap isn’t killing them. If they have an injury on defence they can call him up. Ericksson wouldn’t fill any hole for Montreal, even in the event of an injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gizmo2337 Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ItTakesAnArmy Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 Eriksson will have to be packaged because the team has no cap space to retain salary this year or for the next. Hopefully prospects. A good deal maybe to add OJ and Eriksson together for a 2nd or 3rd round pick or a prospect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noble 6 Posted November 11, 2019 Share Posted November 11, 2019 (edited) Remember when we signed this contract and people were saying that: his play wouldn't drop off significantly the contract would be easy to move if it did Those are two things that anyone could have seen coming the moment we signed him. Edited November 11, 2019 by Horvat is a Boss 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurn Posted November 11, 2019 Share Posted November 11, 2019 11 minutes ago, Horvat is a Boss said: Those are two things that anyone could have seen coming the moment we signed him. Cool, can you find a quote of yours saying that, from the moment they signed him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpeg.0d00651e5a8af8c57be7732916818427.jpeg)
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now