WCE Posted November 18, 2019 Share Posted November 18, 2019 To NJ Eriksson,Schaller & Baertschi To Van Greene,Rooney & Woods This would clear 2.8 mil in cap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BrockBoester Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 I'm sure NJ will jump at the chance to acquire some premiere talent like Eriksson, Schaller and Baertschi, and especially their combined 11.3m in salary! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coastal.view Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 new jersey does cuz of why ??? tell their gm why this is a good idea for them i'm sure he wants to know you gotta sell your trade proposal and i see nothing here worth the devils time 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray_Cathode Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 2 hours ago, WCE said: To NJ Eriksson,Schaller & Baertschi To Van Greene,Rooney & Woods This would clear 2.8 mil in cap Why not throw in Luongo's contract while you have the Devils charmed into paying out our bad contracts and giving us their cap space. Be sure to smile when you close this deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canacks1970 Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 3 hours ago, WCE said: To NJ Eriksson,Schaller & Baertschi To Van Greene,Rooney & Woods This would clear 2.8 mil in cap If you were New Jersey's Gm would you do this trade? A 6 Million dollar player player that has 30 goals in three years and barely playing now. And a player that has health issue along with a 4 line player. How long will you have your job as a Gm? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King Heffy Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 New Jersey likely still says no if we include our 1st. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sonoman Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 New Jersey’s GM 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6string Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 So they no intentions of settling with Hall then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lmm Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 4 hours ago, canacks1970 said: If you were New Jersey's Gm would you do this trade? A 6 Million dollar player player that has 30 goals in three years and barely playing now. And a player that has health issue along with a 4 line player. How long will you have your job as a Gm? Jersey GM says, "that is a great deal, lets throw in Schneider and Demko" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hockeygod77 Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 you guys waste timevwith proposals like this...get real canuck fans..you people are not leaf fans...know your hockey know what it takes to make a good teammm.one thing for sure besides skill and size..its the player his character and his way of playing the game is what is important.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted November 19, 2019 Share Posted November 19, 2019 19 minutes ago, hockeygod77 said: you guys waste timevwith proposals like this...get real canuck fans..you people are not leaf fans...know your hockey know what it takes to make a good teammm.one thing for sure besides skill and size..its the player his character and his way of playing the game is what is important.. What? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odjick the Warrior Posted November 27, 2019 Share Posted November 27, 2019 If the Canucks were interested in a Devils winger that’s not named Hall, it would be Simmonds and you could probably do deal with Stetcher and a forward prospect and Goldobin to even out the cap number. Or if the Canucks wanted to swing for the fences and have some big brass balls and go after Hall it would be like Stetcher, Madden and DiPietro, Ericksson with Canucks absorbing some of Ericksson’s contract to make the cap numbers work. I know the Hall trade sounds crazy but the Canucks have a history of swindling the Devils in trades, but could you imagine the line of Hall, Pettersson, Boeser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted November 27, 2019 Share Posted November 27, 2019 2 minutes ago, IjustNEEDaTROYgamble said: If the Canucks were interested in a Devils winger that’s not named Hall, it would be Simmonds and you could probably do deal with Stetcher and a forward prospect and Goldobin to even out the cap number. Or if the Canucks wanted to swing for the fences and have some big brass balls and go after Hall it would be like Stetcher, Madden and DiPietro, Ericksson with Canucks absorbing some of Ericksson’s contract to make the cap numbers work. I know the Hall trade sounds crazy but the Canucks have a history of swindling the Devils in trades, but could you imagine the line of Hall, Pettersson, Boeser The Devils aren’t going to have to take a 3 year cap dump to trade Hall. And he’ll get a better return than what you’re suggesting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odjick the Warrior Posted November 27, 2019 Share Posted November 27, 2019 5 minutes ago, qwijibo said: The Devils aren’t going to have to take a 3 year cap dump to trade Hall. And he’ll get a better return than what you’re suggesting Ericksson has 2 years left but if not him it would be Pearson or Lievo then and I don’t think they would want either. But the Hall trade wouldn’t happen because I don’t think the Canucks would trade 2 of their top 5 prospects for a rental plus most likely a draft pick. I was just saying if the Canucks were swinging for the fences. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwijibo Posted November 27, 2019 Share Posted November 27, 2019 9 minutes ago, IjustNEEDaTROYgamble said: Ericksson has 2 years left but if not him it would be Pearson or Lievo then and I don’t think they would want either. But the Hall trade wouldn’t happen because I don’t think the Canucks would trade 2 of their top 5 prospects for a rental plus most likely a draft pick. I was just saying if the Canucks were swinging for the fences. I was counting this season as well. Since I’m assuming your suggesting an in season trade. So I count Ericksson as a 3 year cap dump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now