xereau Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 This guy is not going anywhere. 1 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-23 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 Just now, xereau said: This guy is not going anywhere. Why would he? Playing well and putting up points. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, J-23 said: Roussel will be a difference today imo. Won’t be tired like the rest of the boys due to the back to back. He's not playing until Tuesday at the earliest, still needs to see medical staff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, Viper007 said: Was AG 21 or 22 when he signed his contract? He signed at the end of the 2017-2018 season therefore he was 21? Isn't it 80 games before waiver eligibility? That's 2 games from now, but I recall it being 70 for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 5 minutes ago, J-23 said: Roussel will be a difference today imo. Won’t be tired like the rest of the boys due to the back to back. Didn’t he play yesterday for Utica? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-23 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, canuck73_3 said: He's not playing until Tuesday at the earliest, still needs to see medical staff Nooooo we want the back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilduce39 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 21 minutes ago, canuck73_3 said: Trade value + cap space. 18 minutes ago, xereau said: Yep something has to give. Pearson has one year left at 3.75 next year and he’s a good player. We should just sink a prospect / pick to Loui if we’re that worried about space. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 4 minutes ago, xereau said: This guy is not going anywhere. For me the perfect lineup is Gaudette playing on Sutter’s wing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viper007 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 2 minutes ago, canuck73_3 said: That's 2 games from now, but I recall it being 70 for him. Ya that's why I'm asking. If he was 21 it's 80 games, and if he was 22 it's 70. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 1 minute ago, VancouverHabitant said: Didn’t he play yesterday for Utica? And he's not playing tonight anyway, getting checked over again by team doctors before the full green light. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luckylager Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 1 minute ago, VancouverHabitant said: For me the perfect lineup is Gaudette playing on Sutter’s wing Have them trade off depending on possession 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 1 minute ago, ilduce39 said: Pearson has one year left at 3.75 next year and he’s a good player. We should just sink a prospect / pick to Loui if we’re that worried about space. No one is taking that trade for Loui. Not with 3 years term left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xereau Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 Just now, canuck73_3 said: And he's not playing tonight anyway, getting checked over again by team doctors before the full green light. They are going to put his knee in a vise and they are gonna torture test it like they do swords on Forged in Fire. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilduce39 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 Just now, canuck73_3 said: No one is taking that trade for Loui. Not with 3 years term left. Everything has a price. Also, wby do we need cap next year? Pettersson and Quinn are off the books at the same time Tanner is. He gives no relief there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 1 minute ago, ilduce39 said: Everything has a price. Also, wby do we need cap next year? Pettersson and Quinn are off the books at the same time Tanner is. He gives no relief there. The price would be 2 1sts MINIMUM. Marleau was 1 with 1 year left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilduce39 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 Just now, canuck73_3 said: The price would be 2 1sts MINIMUM. Marleau was 1 with 1 year left. Well, he’s the one that has to move to make room for Quinn and Petey. Thankfully he’ll only have that one year left when they’re up. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 3 hours ago, DeNiro said: Still very early in the Calder race, but with Hughes gaining ground on Makar, it’s interesting to note the last time a team had back to back Calder winners was: 66-67 Bobby Orr 67-68 Derek Sanderson Very rare company we could be in if Hughes were to pull it off. Not to mention three finalists in three years. Now you've sent me on a mission to do some hockey research... Alright, results are in: Prior to the 1967 expansion teams had three Calder finalists in the space of three years (two in one year is allowed for this) a total of 9 times, with both Montreal and Toronto doing it three times each. Since the 1967 expansion, here are the occurrences of a team having three Calder finalists in three years : 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilduce39 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 Just now, -AJ- said: Not to mention three finalists in three years. Now you've sent me on a mission to do some hockey research... Alright, results are in: Prior to the 1967 expansion teams had three Calder finalists in the space of three years (two in one year is allowed for this) a total of 9 times, with both Montreal and Toronto doing it three times each. Since the 1967 expansion, here are the occurrences of a team having three Calder finalists in three years : It’s not unprecedented but it’s pretty rarified air... especially recently. I don’t see Quinn beating out a healthy Makar despite being a year younger but damn what a hat trick of young talent. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 22 minutes ago, ilduce39 said: It’s not unprecedented but it’s pretty rarified air... especially recently. I don’t see Quinn beating out a healthy Makar despite being a year younger but damn what a hat trick of young talent. Also worth noting what happened to both the Penguins and the Blackhawks shortly after that stretch of Calder finalists... 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck73_3 Posted December 2, 2019 Share Posted December 2, 2019 4 minutes ago, -AJ- said: Not to mention three finalists in three years. Now you've sent me on a mission to do some hockey research... Alright, results are in: Prior to the 1967 expansion teams had three Calder finalists in the space of three years (two in one year is allowed for this) a total of 9 times, with both Montreal and Toronto doing it three times each. Since the 1967 expansion, here are the occurrences of a team having three Calder finalists in three years : The other thing I like about that stat is all three of those teams won at least one cup in those runs. Montreal 86, Pittsburgh 2009+ Chicago 2010+ 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts