Sign in to follow this  
Boest-er

Proposal/Discussion: VAN & EDM

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I have never made a thread on these sorta things, however I was just wondering if this was fair.

 

We trade Petterson, Boeser, First round, conditional first (we make the SCF)

for Mcdavid

 

I'm not saying lets do it; I'm just wondering if the trade is even or if one team needs to add more.

 

 

 

  

Edited by Boest-er
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If this doesn't convince the administrators that we need at least a 500 post minimum before you can start a thread, I don't know what will.

  • Haha 2
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, 48MPHSlapShot said:

If this doesn't convince the administrators that we need at least a 500 post minimum before you can start a thread, I don't know what will.

I think my trade proposal was better than this one :bigblush:

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Better yet throw in Marky, Virtanen, Benn, two more firsts and Juolevi and lets nab Draisaitl too. 

  • Hydration 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, 48MPHSlapShot said:

If this doesn't convince the administrators that we need at least a 500 post minimum before you can start a thread, I don't know what will.

Thanks for adding to the discussion, like I said I just want to know if the value is fair. Not once in my post did I say we should do it

Good job on not reading what I said.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, N7Nucks said:

Better yet throw in Marky, Virtanen, Benn, two more firsts and Juolevi and lets nab Draisaitl too. 

Thank you for your sarcasm, duly noted.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that we would have to give up to many pieces to be competitive, so it’s not worth it or “fair” value.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Boest-er said:

Thanks for adding to the discussion, like I said I just want to know if the value is fair. Not once in my post did I say we should do it

Good job on not reading what I said.

tenor.gif?itemid=3469496

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I for one appreciate the personality of our team right more than the attitude of McDick and Dr. Drai.

  • Hydration 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/24/2019 at 12:20 PM, Boest-er said:

Hi,

I have never made a thread on these sorta things, however I was just wondering if this was fair.

 

We trade Petterson, Boeser, First round, conditional first (we make the SCF)

for Mcdavid

 

I'm not saying lets do it; I'm just wondering if the trade is even or if one team needs to add more.  

This is a huge over payment in my opinion.

 

Pettersson is only in his 2nd year in the NHL and is 14th in the league in scoring and currently has 39 points.

 

Boeser is still newish to the league and is 22nd in the league in scoring and the 5th highest RW in the league.

 

For all we know Pettersson will be close to being as good as McDavid in a couple years.

 

So you want to trade a star young centre and a bonafide 1st line RW and then throw in possibly two 1st round picks??

 

Gross over payment. No way in hell we do that nor should we imo.

 

Edited by Kanukfanatic
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Kanukfanatic said:

This is a huge over payment in my opinion.

 

Pettersson is only in his 2nd year in the NHL and is 14th in the league in scoring and currently has 39 points.

 

Boeser is still newish to the league and is 22nd in the league in scoring and the 5th highest RW in the league.

 

For all we know Pettersson will be close to being as good as McDavid in a couple years.

 

So you want to trade a star young centre and a bonafide top RW and then throw in a 1st round pick possibly??

 

Gross over payment. No way in hell we do that nor should we imo.

 

McDavid is a fabulous offensive player.  Petey is proving to be a fabulous 200 foot player.  I’m with you.  No way do we make this trade.  

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Most people don't understand 97 is a money making machine.

 

Hockey aside, you want 97 on your team for profits. No way Edmonton makes this deal. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.