Dr. Crossbar Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 The net and puck were conspiring against us. Blame it on AI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Vintage Canuck- Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 Why does the NHL bother giving explanations if the wording is so broad? Quote Type of Review: Puck Over Goal Line Result: Call on the ice is upheld - No goal Vancouver Explanation: Video review confirmed that Brock Boeser's shot did not enter the Buffalo net. https://www.nhl.com/news/vancouver-canucks-buffalo-sabres-situation-room/c-313794226?tid=277729160 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Googlie Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 Interesting- those of us watching the Sabres feed clearly saw the puck over the net, with clear screenshot evidence. But those watching the grainy, blurry sportsnet feed see a puck going thru the net. Are we watching the same shot being replayed? Obviously the replays the refs and Toronto were watching convinced them it was no goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duodenum Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 1 minute ago, canuck2288 said: Doctored video The truth is out there Listening to John and John's X-Files bit? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sedinyoureyesontheprize Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 Just now, Rick_theRyper said: There’s two different shots they’re showing That’s what I think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73 Percent Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 Just now, Rick_theRyper said: There’s two different shots they’re showing Did you even bother watching? 2 different shots?? Where the puck flew the same way? And all players were in the same spot? Doing the same thing? No goal 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canuck2288 Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 Next task for buffalo video crew ... Show Lee Norwood’s field goal attempt go through the uprights Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_Henrik_ Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 Jesus christ! I didn't think people were actually arguing for real in forums anymore. as in, i'm expecting you to change your view because i'm hitting enter many times and use exclamation marks to frighten you. But here you are, all of you! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 Just now, redhdlois said: Wow.......you must have lacked acknowledgement growing up. Surprisingly I did not, but good try with the wannabe CSI shenanigans with the "but the net moved". Clearly a goal, the net moved 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viper007 Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 2 minutes ago, N7Nucks said: I accept apologies only in the form of "Dear my N7 sir, you were right and my tiny small brain should have listened to you". Thank you all for your time. This replay kind of sucks, I can't even see the puck until it's out of play. I'm trying to slo mo it to see if it even hits the bar and goes up. Just all blurry and white. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DS4quality Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 The same hologram that went through Rittich. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyCuddles Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 (edited) 1 minute ago, Googlie said: Interesting- those of us watching the Sabres feed clearly saw the puck over the net, with clear screenshot evidence. But those watching the grainy, blurry sportsnet feed see a puck going thru the net. Are we watching the same shot being replayed? Obviously the replays the refs and Toronto were watching convinced them it was no goal. The world is against the Canucks. I can't believe they didn't use just the overhead angle and give us a goal. Edited January 11, 2020 by N7Nucks 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AV's Coin Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 14 minutes ago, debluvscanucks said: I'm on my phone but looks like Puck went under the post didn't it? Never fully crossed the line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyD Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 Better 2nd at least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alt kilgore Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 The only explanation has to be that its the fault of the camera. Its not running a fast enough speed to accurately detail individual seconds frozen. So it "blurs" time frames into one. Canucks saw the netting pattern above the puck as we did. Its physically impossible for that to happen if the puck wasn't in the net. Or....that camera was too slow for accuracy. Maybe Buffalo should upgrade their cameras from 50 years ago. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonaldBrashear Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 Can Neil Tyson Degrasse please explain why the netting is on top of the puck when the puck is overtop of the net? What kind of magic is that? Is this like the Berenstein Bears thing? #NelsonMandellaEffect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Knucklehd Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 3 minutes ago, Shift-4 said: Just posting these together in an attempt to start a mod fight Crazy, player positioning etc shows it is the same shot, yet the GIF seems to show the puck under the netting, yet the video shows the puck well over the net. Wow, no goal I guess, but wow what an illusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonaldBrashear Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 Just now, kilgore said: The only explanation has to be that its the fault of the camera. Its not running a fast enough speed to accurately detail individual seconds frozen. So it "blurs" time frames into one. Canucks saw the netting pattern above the puck as we did. Its physically impossible for that to happen if the puck wasn't in the net. Or....that camera was too slow for accuracy. Maybe Buffalo should upgrade their cameras from 50 years ago. You are quick, Neil Tyson Degrasse 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-DLC- Posted January 11, 2020 Share Posted January 11, 2020 None of it matters....called no goal so...no goal. I'm changing my mind because the net moving may have been the goaltender shifting/causing it. But I really don't know...both feeds are fairly inconclusive. But let's move on...the game has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post -Vintage Canuck- Posted January 11, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted January 11, 2020 @SabreFan1 was right after all. End of story. 3 4 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts