Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Woman faces deportation 18 years after arriving to Canada as a child


Ryan Strome

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, HI5 said:

France ain’t so bad

Just make sure you have a white towel and you will fit right in.

20 minutes ago, NewbieCanuckFan said:

lol - deport her to Quebec.:lol:  

 

But yeah, France is hardly a 'third world country'.

 

Pretty sure she would choose North Korea over Quebec. 

15 minutes ago, hlinkas wrister said:

The thought of Preston Manning being our PM was a little terrifying frankly. Thank god Stockwell rode in on his jet-ski and put those nightmares to bed.

Ya the old "jet ski stock." The direction of the Ottawa river sure caused him some grief. 

Tbh I actually really like Stockwell Day.

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 years later she still hadn't filed for citizenship or immigrant status?  Sorry lady, rules are rules. 

 

Ya I know this will turn in to a "they can walk across the border" argument if it hasn't already (yay ignore button) but the fact is, she could have at any time in 2 decades simply filed the paperwork.

 

She'll get to stay, that's almost inarguable at this point but you don't get to pick and choose who the rules apply to in an argument.  She could have filed.  She didn't.  Now she has to deal with the paperwork

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ryan Strome said:

Just make sure you have a white towel and you will fit right in.

Pretty sure she would choose North Korea over Quebec. 

Ya the old "jet ski stock." The direction of the Ottawa river sure caused him some grief. 

Tbh I actually really like Stockwell Day.

Hey, I've been to Montreal and Quebec City. Quebec City is more postcard. But the attitude there is something else. Montreal I actually liked. Because you can survive on both English and French, and is more international. Anywhere in Canada is a million times better than North Korea. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Warhippy said:

18 years later she still hadn't filed for citizenship or immigrant status?  Sorry lady, rules are rules. 

 

Ya I know this will turn in to a "they can walk across the border" argument if it hasn't already (yay ignore button) but the fact is, she could have at any time in 2 decades simply filed the paperwork.

 

She'll get to stay, that's almost inarguable at this point but you don't get to pick and choose who the rules apply to in an argument.  She could have filed.  She didn't.  Now she has to deal with the paperwork

But if you and your parents deal with an "Immigrant Consultant" and get bad advice, I think that should factor in. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ghostsof1915 said:

But if you and your parents deal with an "Immigrant Consultant" and get bad advice, I think that should factor in. 

I won't argue with that at all.  But after 2 decades it is impossible to fault anyone but the person at issue.  Immigration consultants are as bad as politicians and real estate agents in the sense they are literally all only there for the same reason and it's never ever for the person.

 

After 2 decades she should have filed, she admits as a child it even sounded fishy to her but never once looked in to it?  While I feel for her there has to be some personal onus on getting something done.  I certainly would not move to France with my kids, have them hang out for 18 years and expect that nothing would ever come up.

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said:

Hey, I've been to Montreal and Quebec City. Quebec City is more postcard. But the attitude there is something else. Montreal I actually liked. Because you can survive on both English and French, and is more international. Anywhere in Canada is a million times better than North Korea. 

Sarcasm. 

4 minutes ago, Ghostsof1915 said:

But if you and your parents deal with an "Immigrant Consultant" and get bad advice, I think that should factor in. 

I want to know why he doesn't mind illegally walking across the border from the richest country on earth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Warhippy said:

I won't argue with that at all.  But after 2 decades it is impossible to fault anyone but the person at issue.  Immigration consultants are as bad as politicians and real estate agents in the sense they are literally all only there for the same reason and it's never ever for the person.

 

After 2 decades she should have filed, she admits as a child it even sounded fishy to her but never once looked in to it?  While I feel for her there has to be some personal onus on getting something done.  I certainly would not move to France with my kids, have them hang out for 18 years and expect that nothing would ever come up.

Interesting because Mexicans do thus in the US and aren't you one of the ones so angry at the thought of them going home? I guess the government of the day factors into your decision?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, hlinkas wrister said:

I was referring to the photo op on lake Okanagan, did he ride a jet ski in the Ottawa river too?

I know the photo op.

No he bungled that question so ofcourse the east attacked him saying he wasn't out there enough. Meanwhile now we have a PM that doesn't even mention the greatest province on Canada's 150th birthday. 

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to go against the trend here....

 

I believe that at a certain point of paying taxes and contributing to the Canadian economy, there should be a path towards citizenship.

 

it's easy for us to sit back and say "too bad, so sad.....she should have followed the rules", but I don't see how any of the parties involved are served by sending a contributing member of Canadian society to a country she hasn't lived in for almost 2 decades.

 

And yes, I thought this way before I saw her photo...

  • Thanks 1
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ronaldoescobar said:

Why is this illegal not in jail until her flight out of Canada?

Because the rules apply differently depending on who you are. It's very telling that her lawyer is banking on a "humanitarian and compassionate application."

 

She should be on the next flight to France. 

  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, RUPERTKBD said:

I'm going to go against the trend here....

 

I believe that at a certain point of paying taxes and contributing to the Canadian economy, there should be a path towards citizenship.

 

it's easy for us to sit back and say "too bad, so sad.....she should have followed the rules", but I don't see how any of the parties involved are served by sending a contributing member of Canadian society to a country she hasn't lived in for almost 2 decades.

 

And yes, I thought this way before I saw her photo...

But hypothetically speaking...

Some rich investor from some East Asian country comes in and buys lots of land, stocks and bonds.  All (or some) earnings are declared and taxable.  

Would that person be allowed a path to citizenship?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Lancaster said:

But hypothetically speaking...

Some rich investor from some East Asian country comes in and buys lots of land, stocks and bonds.  All (or some) earnings are declared and taxable.  

Would that person be allowed a path to citizenship?

Up until 2014 that was a path to citizenship. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, guntrix said:

Because the rules apply differently depending on who you are. It's very telling that her lawyer is banking on a "humanitarian and compassionate application."

 

She should be on the next flight to France. 

Why doesn't she just go to the US and then walk over the border?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...