Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Fire Green!

Rate this topic


Dumb Nuck

Recommended Posts

I like Green, It's his supporting coaches I don't like.

 

That Power play, That is sad when all we do is pass the puck around in a cycle til it gets to Petey, Miller, Boeser. So predictable. 

 

I think we should look into new a PP coach and Defensive coach. That is where we fail :/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i know firing Green would be great, afterall,  the GM has given the team strong foundational veteran players to help the youth . . he got rid of Gudbranson and

Del Zotto, brought in Benn and Fantenberg, signed Myers to bolster defence,  etcetc

 

  why can't that green coach win

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I said this in the GDT thread yesterday and I will stand by that:

 

Quote

Pairing up Benn with Fantenberg just shows that Nolan Baumgartner has no idea what he was doing. I want him gone more than Green TBH!

Then hire some experienced coaches around Green to smack some sense into him when thing got tough!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, whirledpeas said:

i know firing Green would be great, afterall,  the GM has given the team strong foundational veteran players to help the youth . . he got rid of Gudbranson and

Del Zotto, brought in Benn and Fantenberg, signed Myers to bolster defence,  etcetc

 

  why can't that green coach win

IDK bro. Pearson, Gaud, Petey, Boeser, Hughes, Toffoli, Virtanen, Miller, Motte have all been great adds by JB.

 

It's a wonder.

 

Probably need a coach who can get this team to play sound team defense 5v5 instead of this passive play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did listen to Green' post game comments and was really curious when the said this was just like a playoff game. Guess he hadn't seen one for awhile either or just tryig to convince the stupid fans that game was the type of game they had been looking for many seasons and this is their playoffs. Certainly not much hitting.

Either way IF the team was a serious PO contender Green would have been canned already just for shock value.

And then Benning could hire another Willie or Green.

 

The team's system is fractured because the defence does not play defence in a traditional fashion, where they pinch occasionally, on this team every time Hughes is on the ice there is a man out of position.

59 minutes ago, Junkyard Dog said:

IDK bro. Pearson, Gaud, Petey, Boeser, Hughes, Toffoli, Virtanen, Miller, Motte have all been great adds by JB.

Over the length of time Benning has been here there would be players that are not bad on the team, there always has been, but the team is still a bottom team, so they need even more.

Edited by Lazurus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Lazurus said:

Over the length of time Benning has been here, a hockey generation, there would be players not bad on the team, there always has been, but the team is still a bottom team, so they need even more.

Not as much as when he started. Also our cupboard was bone-dry when he started. Best prospects were Shinkaruk and Subban. Benning had to spend a "generation" acquiring the next "generation" because they last regime didn't do a good job at it. Also he had to cope with owners who wanted to try and turn it around right away(2014-15) and that didn't want to decide to rebuild till the team was hot garbage and fans were demanding it.

 

Yeah we still need some pieces but we got a lot of our core pieces set. Our top 2 centers set for an entire generation. A top 2 defenseman and a pretty good RWer all while not getting lotto luck and drafting top 3. Outside the 1st round he's found some players too and we still need to see some. And despite the fact that these young players made the jump early we've still got a pretty decent prospect pool

 

We're not that far off. We just need time and we still are gonna keep adding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Junkyard Dog said:

Not as much as when he started. Also our cupboard was bone-dry when he started. Best prospects were Shinkaruk and Subban. Benning had to spend a "generation" acquiring the next "generation" because they last regime didn't do a good job at it. Also he had to cope with owners who wanted to try and turn it around right away(2014-15) and that didn't want to decide to rebuild till the team was hot garbage and fans were demanding it.

 

Yeah we still need some pieces but we got a lot of our core pieces set. Our top 2 centers set for an entire generation. A top 2 defenseman and a pretty good RWer all while not getting lotto luck and drafting top 3. Outside the 1st round he's found some players too and we still need to see some. And despite the fact that these young players made the jump early we've still got a pretty decent prospect pool

 

We're not that far off. We just need time and we still are gonna keep adding.

I think Hughes could be a franchise defenseman. It's obvious to me that he's banged up and he still is head and shoulders above the others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Lazurus said:

I did listen to Green' post game comments and was really curious when the said this was just like a playoff game. Guess he hadn't seen one for awhile either or just tryig to convince the stupid fans that game was the type of game they had been looking for many seasons and this is their playoffs. Certainly not much hitting.

Either way IF the team was a serious PO contender Green would have been canned already just for shock value.

And then Benning could hire another Willie or Green.

 

The team's system is fractured because the defence does not play defence in a traditional fashion, where they pinch occasionally, on this team every time Hughes is on the ice there is a man out of position.

Over the length of time Benning has been here there would be players that are not bad on the team, there always has been, but the team is still a bottom team, so they need even more.

You should apply for the coaching job

  • Thanks 1
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Junkyard Dog said:

Not as much as when he started. Also our cupboard was bone-dry when he started. Best prospects were Shinkaruk and Subban. Benning had to spend a "generation" acquiring the next "generation" because they last regime didn't do a good job at it. Also he had to cope with owners who wanted to try and turn it around right away(2014-15) and that didn't want to decide to rebuild till the team was hot garbage and fans were demanding it.

 

Yeah we still need some pieces but we got a lot of our core pieces set. Our top 2 centers set for an entire generation. A top 2 defenseman and a pretty good RWer all while not getting lotto luck and drafting top 3. Outside the 1st round he's found some players too and we still need to see some. And despite the fact that these young players made the jump early we've still got a pretty decent prospect pool

 

We're not that far off. We just need time and we still are gonna keep adding.

This bone dry stuff all the time. Gillis left the team as twice being the league's best team, divisional titles, conference champs and just as many  prospects playing on the team as Benning has now, all with no top ten picks let alone 8 first round picks, 4 in the top 7. Besides that is a very long time ago. If you look you will see that the important players are from Gillis's time, Horvat, Tanev, Markstrom, Edler, Gaudette, not a bad legacy seven years later.

Edited by Lazurus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Lazurus said:

This bone dry stuff all the time. Gillis left the team as twice being the league's best team, divisional titles, conference champs and just as many  prospects playing on the team as Benning has now, all with no top ten picks let alone 8 first round picks, 4 in the top 7. Besides that is a very long time ago. If you look you will see that the important players are from Gillis's time, Horvat, Tanev, Markstrom, Edler, Gaudette, not a bad legacy seven years later.

I am not sure GMMG got us Gaudette might of gotten us the pick but didn't draft him. He also didn't draft Edler. Not saying GMMG was bad but he did leave us bone dry when it comes to prospects. Thanks for Marky and Bo in those 5 years you were here.

 

GMMG drafted from 2008-2013. His notables are Hodgson who eventually didn't pan out, Connauton who is a 7th D, Hutton who's a top 6 D and Horvat. One good player in 5 years of drafting. His last draft was 6 drafts ago so it can't be argued that some guys are too early to tell.

 

Lets compare to Benning. 2014-2019 "So far" McCann, Virtanen, Demko and Tryamkin, Boeser, Gaudette, Pettersson, Hughes. And we still have to wait and see if others pan out. That's a star defenseman in Hughes, a star winger in Boeser, a star centre in Petey, potential starter in Demko, potential defenseman in Tryamkin and 3 top 9 forwards in Gaudette, Virtanen and McCann. All of these guys are still under 25 besides Tryamkin btw

 

Hell there might be more coming out of those draft classes(2014-19). Lind, OJ, Hog, Pod, Woo, Rathbone, Madden, DiPrietro, list goes on. It is still not set.


He inherited a pretty good team and made the right trades and signings to push us far. BUT he did nothing for our prospect pool in 5 years of drafting besides Bo. Only other guy he brought in who was young was Tanev via FA and traded Luongo for Markstrom. We're also suffering for a cap-hit from Luongo for the next 3 years because of that 12 year deal he signed from Gillis.

 

You think Gillis came close to that prospect pool? Really?

Edited by Junkyard Dog
  • Cheers 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Junkyard Dog said:

I am not sure GMMG got us Gaudette might of gotten us the pick but didn't draft him. He also didn't draft Edler. Not saying GMMG was bad but he did leave us bone dry when it comes to prospects. Thanks for Marky and Bo in those 5 years you were here.

 

GMMG drafted from 2008-2013. His notables are Hodgson who eventually didn't pan out, Connauton who is a 7th D, Hutton who's a top 6 D and Horvat. One good player in 5 years of drafting. His last draft was 6 drafts ago so it can't be argued that some guys are too early to tell.

 

Lets compare to Benning. 2014-2019 "So far" McCann, Virtanen, Demko and Tryamkin, Boeser, Gaudette, Pettersson, Hughes. And we still have to wait and see if others pan out. That's a star defenseman in Hughes, a star winger in Boeser, a star centre in Petey, potential starter in Demko, potential defenseman in Tryamkin and 3 top 9 forwards in Gaudette, Virtanen and McCann. All of these guys are still under 25 besides Tryamkin btw

 

Hell there might be more coming out of those draft classes(2014-19). Lind, OJ, Hog, Pod, Woo, Rathbone, Madden, DiPrietro, list goes on. It is still not set.


He inherited a pretty good team and made the right trades and signings to push us far. BUT he did nothing for our prospect pool in 5 years of drafting besides Bo. Only other guy he brought in who was young was Tanev via FA and traded Luongo for Markstrom. We're also suffering for a cap-hit from Luongo for the next 3 years because of that 12 year deal he signed from Gillis.

 

You think Gillis came close to that prospect pool? Really?

It is the past but he did just as good as Detroit.

Having a bunch of names on a list is not making the team better and a monkey could draft BPA off the lists they have now, Gillis hit a home run on every top ten pick he had, Benning has at least one bomb in a top 5 pick, the only top player not to have played a game, the other injured top 6 drafted player was Virtanen. But Virtanen could always skate fast and as long as he doesn't fight or hit too much his shoulder will hold up.

If in 4 or 5 years all these possibilities make the NHL then he will be just like most GM's in the league, fired before they come to play.

I get it some posters are still holding out that Juolevi is the power play specialist and an Ohlund clone, just not happening. Virtanen is finally being used as a scorer instead of a knuckle dragger.

McCann isn't here Benning didn't think he was good enough, Tryamkin is thanks to Gradin before Benning got here, you give him credit for 3 weeks work? That draft was all Gillis's people. And Gillis wanted Larkin instead of an injured Virtanen.

 

Hodgson had a serious disease that affected his back and ended his career. He never was using the pain as an excuse because he thought he was entitled as AV stated.

 

Can't keep blaming something that happened 7 years ago and keep ignoring what other team are doing around you, Ottawa blew it up, striped their team down after trading away ALL their prospects and in 2 years now will have twice as many 1rst round picks on it as the Canucks in 6 years. Even the NJD have embarrassed the Canucks in their youth movement.

But comparison's to other teams is a taboo here.

Edited by Lazurus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder about the entire coaching group. Now granted there have been injuries. That, though, might be partly because of the coaching. It is obvious that the goalies and many of the team are not ready at the start of games. Everything comes back to the coaches, always, that is the way it is, they are responsible. I don't think this team was ever meant to be defensive and they should not try to be. Sitting on leads, or trying to come back after I'st period let downs is not how they should play. They should always be attacking.  One also has seen this bunch play some real good games, but since losing Markstrum and Boeser, along with Pettersen and Hughes being attacked every game, the coaches might be having trouble motivating the team.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...