Nucker 67 Posted January 22, 2020 Share Posted January 22, 2020 25 minutes ago, kingofsurrey said: No woman chooses to get attacked by a dude that looks like Shrek..... They sure didn't do it because he was good looking lol, but they had their reasons 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingofsurrey Posted January 23, 2020 Share Posted January 23, 2020 Just now, NUCKER67 said: They sure didn't do it because he was good looking lol, but they had their reasons These woman did not choose for these incidents to happen. These woman are victims. Stop blaming the victims. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonLever Posted January 23, 2020 Author Share Posted January 23, 2020 It is a sad day if "she is doing it for the money" routine is used to justify or minimize the harm perpetrated by the rich and famous. Not to say that does not happen but what victim want their lives dissected in the media or in court just for the money. No victim would want to come forward if indeed an assault occur. It is call victim shaming. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewbieCanuckFan Posted January 23, 2020 Share Posted January 23, 2020 28 minutes ago, RUPERTKBD said: Hopefully somewhere where people in power give him the same treatment he doled out to these women. If he gets real prison time, he'll demand to be put in "protective custody". Sex offenders aren't too highly thought of by other prisoners. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUPERTKBD Posted January 23, 2020 Share Posted January 23, 2020 1 minute ago, NewbieCanuckFan said: If he gets real prison time, he'll demand to be put in "protective custody". Sex offenders aren't too highly thought of by other prisoners. He can "demand". Lets see how that goes.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingofsurrey Posted January 23, 2020 Share Posted January 23, 2020 (edited) 10 minutes ago, RUPERTKBD said: He can "demand". Lets see how that goes.... If he is found guilty as charged...... may get to experience the fear and terror his accusers felt ....... karma is b...... Edited January 23, 2020 by kingofsurrey 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUPERTKBD Posted January 23, 2020 Share Posted January 23, 2020 5 minutes ago, kingofsurrey said: If he is found guilty as charged...... may get to experience the fear and terror his accusers felt ....... karma is b...... If he isn't, it's a bigger F-Up than the OJ trial.... 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yung1 Posted January 23, 2020 Share Posted January 23, 2020 3 hours ago, NUCKER67 said: We all have choices in life. You're disgusting and your take on this is bad. So are your takes on hockey so maybe I shouldnt be surprised. God, you're an idiot. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted January 23, 2020 Share Posted January 23, 2020 1 hour ago, RUPERTKBD said: If he isn't, it's a bigger F-Up than the OJ trial.... Than a murder. Really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurn Posted January 23, 2020 Share Posted January 23, 2020 5 minutes ago, Monty said: Than a murder. Really. That would be a double murder. However I think Hippy is saying that given multiple witnesses, and multiple victims it would be a bigger screw up to not get a conviction, than the botched OJ trial. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monty Posted January 23, 2020 Share Posted January 23, 2020 1 minute ago, gurn said: That would be a double murder. However I think Hippy is saying that given multiple witnesses, and multiple victims it would be a bigger screw up to not get a conviction, than the botched OJ trial. Screw up? Sure. Bigger screw up, though? Bigger than murder? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gurn Posted January 23, 2020 Share Posted January 23, 2020 24 minutes ago, Monty said: Screw up? Sure. Bigger screw up, though? Bigger than murder? Yes, a bigger screw up, but not a bigger tragedy. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUPERTKBD Posted January 23, 2020 Share Posted January 23, 2020 12 hours ago, gurn said: That would be a double murder. However I think Hippy is saying that given multiple witnesses, and multiple victims it would be a bigger screw up to not get a conviction, than the botched OJ trial. I'm not Hippy, but yes, that was the point. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonLever Posted February 20, 2020 Author Share Posted February 20, 2020 (edited) https://www.reuters.com/article/us-people-harvey-weinstein-idUSKBN20D1GG NEW YORK (Reuters) - Jurors in Harvey Weinstein’s rape trial appeared to take a methodical approach in their deliberations on Wednesday, asking to review testimony from a former production assistant who says Weinstein raped her as well as from actress Rosie Perez. The jury also asked to see texts to Weinstein from defense witness Paul Feldsher before ending their second day of deliberations. Jurors are expected to continue their discussions on Thursday.Weinstein, smiling as he left court for the day, was asked by a reporter whether he was worried. The expression on the former Hollywood producer’s face turned serious, and he shook his head no. Edited February 20, 2020 by DonLever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nuckin_futz Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 Harvey Weinstein trial: Guilty of rape and criminal sexual act, but acquitted of top sex charges Fallen film producer Harvey Weinsten was found guilty of rape and a criminal sexual act. Weinstein, 67, was found not guilty of the most serious charges in the case, two counts of predatory sexual assault. He also was acquitted of first-degree rape in a Manhattan courtoom. Allegations of sexual sexual abuse by Harvey Weinstein ignited the so-called MeToo movement. Fallen film producer Harvey Weinsten was found guilty Monday of rape and a criminal sexual act. Weinstein, 67, was found not guilty of the most serious charges in the case, two counts of predatory sexual assault. He also was acquitted of first-degree rape in a Manhattan courtoom. The charge of third-degree rape that Weinstein was convicted of relates to the claim that he attacked aspiring actress Jessica Mann in a hotel room in Manhattan in 2013. The first-degree criminal sexual act charge that he was convicted of relates to the claim that forcibly performed oral sex on production assistant Mimi Haley in 2006. On Friday, jurors in the trial — seven men and five women — were told by the judge to keep deliberating after they suggested they were hung on the most serious charges, of predatory sexual assault, in the case. Jurors had told Judge James Burke in a note, “We the jury request to understand if we can be hung on 1 and or 3 but unanimous on the others.” Counts 1 and 3 are charges of predatory sexual assault. Count 2 is criminal sexual act in the first degree, count 4 is rape in the first degree, and count 5 is rape in the third degree. Burke told jurors that any verdict that they returned must be unanimous and that if they cannot be unanimous on a specific criminal count then they cannot return a verdict for that count. The judge asked the jurors to continue their deliberations, noting that it is not uncommon for a jury to have difficulty reaching a verdict. Jurors then resumed their deliberations for less than a half hour before Burke dismissed them for the weekend. Burke then dismissed the jurors for the weekend and told them to come back to court to continue their discussions on Monday morning. The actress Annabella Sciorra testified during the trial that Weinstein raped her in her apartment in either late 1993 or early 1994. Weinstein was not charged in the case with raping Sciorra. But her testimony, along with that of five other women, was permitted by the judge in order to allow prosecutors to show a pattern of conduct by Weinstein. Jury deliberations in the case began last Tuesday morning. Weinstein did not testify at the trial. Weinstein for years was one of Hollywood’s powerful men, having backed a long string of financially successful and critically acclaimed movies such as “Shakespeare in Love” and “Gangs of New York.” https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/24/harvey-weinstein-reach-verdict-in-movie-producers-me-too-trial.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUPERTKBD Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBH1926 Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 Rule number one, don’t drop the soap! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kragar Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 58 minutes ago, CBH1926 said: Rule number one, don’t drop the soap! Maybe he'll get to try out his Ned Beatty impression while he's in prison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUPERTKBD Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 9 hours ago, Kragar said: Maybe he'll get to try out his Ned Beatty impression while he's in prison. Well...he already looks like a pig..... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kragar Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 25 minutes ago, RUPERTKBD said: Well...he already looks like a pig..... I wonder what the split is on who here gets the joke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now