DeNiro Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 Lol he slashed him on his stick. Thats sometimes not even a penalty let alone a fine. At least if they called him for flinging the stick into the stands I could understand a fine, but that is beyond ridiculous. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanless Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 17 minutes ago, kilgore said: Hahaha Oh....its not a joke account? Just did some checking on the Preds site. Nope. No injury from it. I don't know the last time I saw a "maximum fine" for a slash in a game after the fact. Its a good whack, but its not like Weber is crippled by it. This is a two minute penalty at most. Unless it was about throwing the stick, inadvertently, into the crowd, but that's not the reason they gave. What a joke, compared to the head hunting that many times doesn't even get called on the ice. I would say because of circumstances the fine was handed out. It was a hockey play slash but one that looked malicious only and could have done some serious damage I agree with it for sure, but now they need to be consistent 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awalk Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 1 hour ago, apollo said: It's disrespectful to the guys that were all there for him when he got it retired. Linden did NOT miss a retirement ceremony of two guys joining him up in the rafters (this is the first time in history any team has had a dual retirement) I won't show some respect because I think it's a classless move by Pavel. Dont get me wrong, he was my favourite player for about 5 years... I have countless Bure cards and a framed picture signed by him. I respect his talent and hall of fame career. I'll tell you that he's one of the most electrifying goal scorers in nhl history... And his goals per game backs that up. But it's an absolute PRIVILEGE to have your # retired... Once you accept the privilege then you must be present. I'm not taking anything away from his play on the ice, he was our first super star. But he isn't a "Canuck at heart" and his absence has proven that. Are you aware of the circumstances that prevented him from being there in person? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawdzukes Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 2 hours ago, PhillipBlunt said: Rather see this: Miller - Pettersson - Boeser Ferland - Horvat - Virtanen Roussel - Gaudette - MacEwen Motte - Beagle - Sutter Bailey Eriksson, Leivo, and Pearson gone. Lol, no way Blunt. No way we wreck that chemistry and trade Pearson unless we're bringing in Kreider in exchange. Hmmmm, that might just work as a returnable asset for the Rangers. Also we are stuck with Leivo due to injury concerns. Interesting take but that third line looks super suspect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maniwaki Canuck Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 On board with those who gave props to MacEwan and Bailey. When our forecheck is working, we are extremely good. When it isn't, we tend to get dominated. These guys made it work. The game is so much about putting pressure on the opponent and breaking their systems down. If you're not doing it, chances are the opponent is doing it to you. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 Just now, Gawdzukes said: Lol, no way Blunt. No way we wreck that chemistry and trade Pearson unless we're bringing in Kreider in exchange. Hmmmm, that might just work as a returnable asset for the Rangers. Also we are stuck with Leivo due to injury concerns. Interesting take but that third line looks super suspect. Yeah. I threw it out there. . I've heard that Kreider has no interest in a Canadian team though. I could see Pearson being traded for a defenseman like Dillon from San Jose. He does have chemistry with Bo though. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phat Fingers Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 5k for a entertaining infraction. I think Rousell is fine with that.... Get it..... Fine with that... lol. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viper007 Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 1 minute ago, Phat Fingers said: 5k for a entertaining infraction. I think Rousell is fine with that.... Get it..... Fine with that... lol. *crickets* 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawdzukes Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 5 minutes ago, PhillipBlunt said: Yeah. I threw it out there. . I've heard that Kreider has no interest in a Canadian team though. I could see Pearson being traded for a defenseman like Dillon from San Jose. He does have chemistry with Bo though. That's right. But you did get me thinking. Pearson would definitely be a good trade chip having years left on his contract and playing at high form. But .... CHEMISTRY! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 Just now, Gawdzukes said: That's right. But you did get me thinking. Pearson would definitely be a good trade chip having years left on his contract and playing at high form. But .... CHEMISTRY! Probably the most important aspect of any roster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GhostsOf1994 Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 15 minutes ago, Gawdzukes said: Lol, no way Blunt. No way we wreck that chemistry and trade Pearson unless we're bringing in Kreider in exchange. Hmmmm, that might just work as a returnable asset for the Rangers. Also we are stuck with Leivo due to injury concerns. Interesting take but that third line looks super suspect. KREIDER WILL NEVER BE A CANUCK! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawdzukes Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 Just now, GhostsOf1994 said: KREIDER WILL NEVER BE A CANUCK! Could you repeat that, I missed it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GhostsOf1994 Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 2 minutes ago, Gawdzukes said: Could you repeat that, I missed it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawdzukes Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 Just now, GhostsOf1994 said: 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dats hockey Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 2 hours ago, stawns said: yeah, you seem like a real "look on the bright side" kind of guy. And you seem like some dick with no friends. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riffraff Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 1 hour ago, kilgore said: Hahaha Oh....its not a joke account? Just did some checking on the Preds site. Nope. No injury from it. I don't know the last time I saw a "maximum fine" for a slash in a game after the fact. Its a good whack, but its not like Weber is crippled by it. This is a two minute penalty at most. Unless it was about throwing the stick, inadvertently, into the crowd, but that's not the reason they gave. What a joke, compared to the head hunting that many times doesn't even get called on the ice. This is the roussel I don’t like. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phat Fingers Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 52 minutes ago, Viper007 said: *crickets* They love my puns. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phat Fingers Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 (edited) 28 minutes ago, Dats hockey said: And you seem like some dick with no friends. I don't judge, but I do think we shouldn't talk about who 'seem(s) to like some dick' or not. This is a family site... lol. Edited February 11, 2020 by Phat Fingers 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dats hockey Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 10 minutes ago, Phat Fingers said: I don't judge, but I do think we shouldn't talk about who 'seem(s) to like some dick' or not. This is a family site... lol. My bad, it’s just he attack my character and said I sexually harass girls because I don’t like Newell brown Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phat Fingers Posted February 11, 2020 Share Posted February 11, 2020 7 minutes ago, Dats hockey said: My bad, it’s just he attack my character and said I sexually harass girls because I don’t like Newell brown Whaaaaa? Well that's extreme. I would totally report that. I was making a joke... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now