brian42 Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 (edited) Source: Bob Mckenzie: https://www.tsn.ca/nhl/video/insider-trading-is-there-a-real-possibility-the-leafs-move-barrie~1905512 Toronto is willing to listen on Tyson Barrie. Toronto wants assets that can help them now but may flip acquired picks/prospects to another team. Toronto also wants a right hand D-man to play with Riley. May or may not see Troy Stecher as a fit. If Vancouver did this deal they'd have zero chance to sign all of their UFAs so they would be helping the team for this year at the expense of the future. However if Stecher is a part of a deal the argument can be made that he wouldn't have been re-signed anyways with a guy like Rafferty or Tryamkin stepping in. Edited February 21, 2020 by brian42 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tystick Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 Very interesting. Benning's going to make a move, that's clear. We have roughly $7mil in cap space atm. Sounds like it's possible that Boeser returns before the playoffs. So salary will either have to be retained or a contract will be heading back the other way. If this is true, we're sending back a defenseman their way. Stecher or Tanev? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Canucks Curse Posted February 21, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 21, 2020 I do not know what Barrie would provide that Hughes does not Hughes >>>> Barrie 1 3 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canucks Curse Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 I would prefer we target ristoleinen 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rekker Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 I just don't see a package that we could offer that TO would want. Do we really need Barrie? I don't see a fit here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Nuxfanabroad Posted February 21, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 21, 2020 Would anyone consider Tanev + Baer For Barrie & Kapanen? 6 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mathew Barzal Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 Wonder if we can get them to bite on Myers. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devron Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 Why so we can get scored on more 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ghostsof1915 Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 1 minute ago, Mathew Barzal said: Wonder if we can get them to bite on Myers. Rather them bite on Eriksson. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TNucks1 Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 barrie would just be a rental, doubt we re-sign with the money he wants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Tystick Posted February 21, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 21, 2020 I agree with others. We're already taking a risk on Toffoli, even though I think odds are we sign him. If we're going to give up assets, we should be trading for a young, quality defenseman already under contract. 2 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Outsiders Posted February 21, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 21, 2020 Wonder if a Tanev for Barrie straight up deal would work? - Tanev and Rielly played together at the worlds. - TOR needs a defensive man - we get a PP2 QB. - Canucks shouldn't pay Tanev 5+ in free agency - Tyson Barrie will cost 6.5? 50 PT d man would he take a little less to play here? 5 x 6 (Myers contract) Edler-Barrie Hughes-Myers 2 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontaylorforprez Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 (edited) I think this is hogwash.. if they couldn’t land Simmonds, and (to some) overpaid for Toffoli. I think a more suitable, and maybe cheaper route, may be Granlund. Edited February 21, 2020 by dontaylorforprez Found what I was looking for Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-AJ- Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 Maybe making use of our LTIR relief. If we added Barrie, when healthy, we'd effectively be something like $6 or $7M over the cap, and that's before re-signing guys like Marky, Gaudette, and Virtanen to a raise. Toffoli and Barrie will/would either be rentals themselves or force us to let other pieces go, effectuating the same thing. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post rekker Posted February 21, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 21, 2020 1 minute ago, Outsiders said: Wonder if a Tanev for Barrie straight up deal would work? - Tanev and Rielly played together at the worlds. - TOR needs a defensive man - we get a PP2 QB. - Canucks shouldn't pay Tanev 5+ in free agency - Tyson Barrie will cost 6.5? 50 PT d man would he take a little less to play here? 5 x 6 (Myers contract) Edler-Barrie Hughes-Myers I don't see the need to break up such a great pairing in Hughes and Tanev. I don't see the fit here with Barrie. 3 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Alflives Posted February 21, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 21, 2020 2 minutes ago, Outsiders said: Wonder if a Tanev for Barrie straight up deal would work? - Tanev and Rielly played together at the worlds. - TOR needs a defensive man - we get a PP2 QB. - Canucks shouldn't pay Tanev 5+ in free agency - Tyson Barrie will cost 6.5? 50 PT d man would he take a little less to play here? 5 x 6 (Myers contract) Edler-Barrie Hughes-Myers Tanev is a much more important player to a team winning than Barrie. 2 4 8 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RetroCanuck Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 8 minutes ago, Tystick said: I agree with others. We're already taking a risk on Toffoli, even though I think odds are we sign him. If we're going to give up assets, we should be trading for a young, quality defenseman already under contract. Agreed, if were trading for another piece, that player needs to have some term. Josh Manson kind of move 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EternalCanuckFan Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 I don't see why the Leafs would deal Barrie without something significant in return. Rielly is probably out for the remainder of the season and they have been hit hard with injuries all through their line-up. I like Stecher but I can't imagine they would expect him to replace Barrie. Their D is thin enough even if everyone was healthy. I'm not saying I would do this but Gaudette's name has been in the wind on Twitter and if that's the case, then maybe it's in relation to a Barrie deal. It's one of the few things I could see getting the attention of the Leafs. If I'm the Canucks though, then that's not something I would be interested in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Junkyard Dog Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 If it was Stech for Barrie but there's no way Toronto does that straight up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeNiro Posted February 21, 2020 Share Posted February 21, 2020 1 minute ago, Junkyard Dog said: If it was Stech for Barrie but there's no way Toronto does that straight up. Well if you believe the Gaudette rumours maybe it’s something like: Gaudette, Stecher, Baertschi for Barrie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts