EdgarM Posted March 6, 2020 Share Posted March 6, 2020 1 minute ago, Tre Mac said: Your analysis on what happened is suspect at best if you think Gaudette was brutal on that play. That was Gauds "check" who scored and all he did was watch him walk right in. Isn't it when you are in your own zone that you play DEFENSE? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rychicken Posted March 6, 2020 Share Posted March 6, 2020 2 minutes ago, -Vintage Canuck- said: Conspiracy theorist me thinks Green asked Batch to ask that question lol Seriously though, some of us have been saying this for a long time. Coach did a great job explaining it here...if we play Bo (and Loui) and can neutralize MacKinnon's line, then our chances to win increase... 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post 73 Percent Posted March 6, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted March 6, 2020 (edited) 30 minutes ago, -Vintage Canuck- said: This would make sense if we actually shut down the opposition and jake could provide offence to the bottom six. But we dont. And he cant. So instead we get scored on and cant score. Not a recipe for success imo. Edited March 6, 2020 by 73 Percent 4 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdgarM Posted March 6, 2020 Share Posted March 6, 2020 2 minutes ago, 4thLineGrinder said: is roussel still struggling had that tip in gone for a goal? green tasked rousell with playing the burrows role, he went to the net front to create havok and he did his job someone is making stuff up to fit there own narrative that s for sure, it's just not me in this case Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted March 6, 2020 Share Posted March 6, 2020 19 minutes ago, I.Am.Ironman said: I do think JT gets an A next year though. Edler, Tanev, Miller, Sutter/Myers would be my picks to cycle through. Sutter shouldn't have a letter next year. Give it to someone deserving like Miller, Pettersson, Boeser, or Hughes. Hopefully Sutter is gone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devron Posted March 6, 2020 Share Posted March 6, 2020 1 minute ago, PhillipBlunt said: Sutter shouldn't have a letter next year. Give it to someone deserving like Miller, Pettersson, Boeser, or Hughes. Hopefully Sutter is gone. You gotta wait till offseason. It will probably change and there’s a chance Sutter is gone too. Worry about it then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted March 6, 2020 Share Posted March 6, 2020 Just now, Devron44 said: You gotta wait till offseason. It will probably change and there’s a chance Sutter is gone too. Worry about it then You do you. I’m not interested in instruction on how to worry or what to worry about. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted March 6, 2020 Share Posted March 6, 2020 5 minutes ago, 73 Percent said: This would make sense if we actually $&!# down the opposition and jake could provide offence to the bottom six. But we dont. And he cant. So instead we get scored on and cant score. Not a recipe for success imo. But Eriksson is the safe choice on the line. Just watch and see how safely he plays. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devron Posted March 6, 2020 Share Posted March 6, 2020 (edited) 9 minutes ago, PhillipBlunt said: You do you. I’m not interested in instruction on how to worry or what to worry about. Just saying, doesn’t change anything. Sorry didn’t mean to rub you the wrong way Edit: I miss read, you did say next season Edited March 6, 2020 by Devron44 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wai_lai416 Posted March 6, 2020 Share Posted March 6, 2020 12 hours ago, lmm said: whell, there is Alex Edler actually Tanev played twice as many games as dEdly in the minors who is the D-coach in Utica? Ya 3exactly nothing to be proud of ahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdgarM Posted March 6, 2020 Share Posted March 6, 2020 Just now, 73 Percent said: This would make sense if we actually $&!# down the opposition and jake could provide offence to the bottom six. But we dont. And he cant. So instead we get scored on and cant score. Not a recipe for success imo. Thank You , good in theory. This is what happens: With LE on the line. A shoot in occurs and LE retrieves the puck. He has no creative ability so he passes it to the point. The D shoots it at the net, we lose possession, and the puck goes back the other way. When Jake is on the line, Jake and Bo carry the puck into the zone, either Bo,Jake and Pearson make some creative play and get quality shots on net. Jake is good along the boards so sustained pressure stays in the O zone and the opposition must defend in their OWN ZONE. But who wants to watch our young guys get great scoring chances lets watch an ol -has- been play the SAFE way. Can I pay to watch this too? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Devron Posted March 6, 2020 Share Posted March 6, 2020 12 minutes ago, mll said: Behind the Athletic's paywall: https://theathletic.com/1273379/2019/10/09/sizing-up-the-nhl-2019-20-nhl-teams-by-age-height-weight-and-nationality/ I tried but then I had to download app. Then couldn’t figure it out lol. I believe ya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bree2 Posted March 6, 2020 Share Posted March 6, 2020 34 minutes ago, -Vintage Canuck- said: I wish Hughes and Tanev played on the top line instead of Stecher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rabbit Posted March 6, 2020 Share Posted March 6, 2020 We face a good team tonight. It looks we will play good, from the previous experience. Our coach faced the problem of D, not forwarders. I don't understand Green always make changes of forwarder lines, not the D. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GritGrinder Posted March 6, 2020 Share Posted March 6, 2020 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mll Posted March 6, 2020 Share Posted March 6, 2020 19 minutes ago, Devron44 said: I tried but then I had to download app. Then couldn’t figure it out lol. I believe ya. Here are the teams younger than the Canucks. Was done the 1st weekend of the season. COL 25.7 CBJ - NYR - CAR 25.8 TOR 26.1 WPG 26.2 BUF - ANA 26.3 NJ - PHI 26.5 MTL 26.8 FLA CGY 27.0 EDM 27.1 OTT 27.2 VAN 27.5 average age 27.3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted March 6, 2020 Share Posted March 6, 2020 21 minutes ago, Devron44 said: Just saying, doesn’t change anything. Yes, and neither does what you're saying. 21 minutes ago, Devron44 said: Sorry didn’t mean to rub you the wrong way I'm rubbed just fine. If someone writes a post that has bossy overtones to it, I respond. 21 minutes ago, Devron44 said: Edit: I miss read, you did say next season Yes. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhillipBlunt Posted March 6, 2020 Share Posted March 6, 2020 18 minutes ago, bree2 said: I wish Hughes and Tanev played on the top line instead of Stecher. They essentially are the top defensive pairing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WZRD Posted March 6, 2020 Share Posted March 6, 2020 I think the Canucks lose again tonight, but I hope I’m wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dumb Nuck Posted March 6, 2020 Share Posted March 6, 2020 Green said something about the team giving 100% the rest of the season, how is he going to accomplish that when he couldn’t for the first 80% of the season, just lip service IMHO. 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts