Ryan Strome Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 Just now, RUPERTKBD said: I'm insulted..... .....by now I should be "Snow King", or "Snow Emperor"..... Liquor king? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUPERTKBD Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 (edited) 1 minute ago, Ryan Strome said: Liquor king? God-Emperor for life...... ....although, in my younger days, it was The Prince of Ales".... Edited April 22, 2020 by RUPERTKBD 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russ Posted April 22, 2020 Share Posted April 22, 2020 10 hours ago, BabychStache said: I haven’t seen what types of weapons were used. Has anybody read that? Still can't find an article saying what it is as the RCMP has declined to comment on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 21 minutes ago, Russ said: Still can't find an article saying what it is as the RCMP has declined to comment on it. Yet yesterday they were talking about the gun ban without knowing what gun was used. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lionized27 Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, Ryan Strome said: Yet yesterday they were talking about the gun ban without knowing what gun was used. Doesn't matter. It's a gun. Ban them all and everyone will be much safer. "Never waste a good crisis." /S Edited April 23, 2020 by Lionized27 Sarcasm 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Russ Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 48 minutes ago, Lionized27 said: Doesn't matter. It's a gun. Ban them all and everyone will be much safer. "Never waste a good crisis." So you want to punish millions of perfectly law abiding citizens because of some wacko who the RCMP can't confirm or deny if he had a PAL at all let alone the weapon used. If it comes and out he doesn't have his PAL then he got his hands on an illegal gun, which 95% of crimes in Canada are from guns imported illegally from the USA anyways which makes the argument that guns should be banned even worse because these wackjobs are going to get a weapon regardless, whether its a gun, knife, vehicle, etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lionized27 Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 7 minutes ago, Russ said: So you want to punish millions of perfectly law abiding citizens because of some wacko who the RCMP can't confirm or deny if he had a PAL at all let alone the weapon used. If it comes and out he doesn't have his PAL then he got his hands on an illegal gun, which 95% of crimes in Canada are from guns imported illegally from the USA anyways which makes the argument that guns should be banned even worse because these wackjobs are going to get a weapon regardless, whether its a gun, knife, vehicle, etc. I added the /S for those who didn't read my previous comment in this thread. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J-Dizzle Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 2 hours ago, Russ said: Still can't find an article saying what it is as the RCMP has declined to comment on it. The officer doing the briefing confirmed he didn't have a PAL (he said FAC but Canada hasn't issued F.A.C's in years so I'm assuming he's referring to the PAL) so however he obtained what he used it was 100% illegal. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 23 minutes ago, Russ said: So you want to punish millions of perfectly law abiding citizens because of some wacko who the RCMP can't confirm or deny if he had a PAL at all let alone the weapon used. If it comes and out he doesn't have his PAL then he got his hands on an illegal gun, which 95% of crimes in Canada are from guns imported illegally from the USA anyways which makes the argument that guns should be banned even worse because these wackjobs are going to get a weapon regardless, whether its a gun, knife, vehicle, etc. Russ you're a smart guy I think quarantine is getting to you. Haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 1 minute ago, J-Dizzle said: The officer doing the briefing confirmed he didn't have a PAL (he said FAC but Canada hasn't issued F.A.C's in years so I'm assuming he's referring to the PAL) so however he obtained what he used it was 100% illegal. @Jimmy McGill @RUPERTKBD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CBH1926 Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 1 minute ago, Ryan Strome said: @Jimmy McGill @RUPERTKBD I saw somewhere that the shooter was convicted or charged with some sort of assault. Wouldn't he be prohibited from owning a gun in Canada? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lionized27 Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 6 minutes ago, CBH1926 said: I saw somewhere that the shooter was convicted or charged with some sort of assault. Wouldn't he be prohibited from owning a gun in Canada? No. It would certainly ensure it would be more difficult to obtain his PAL though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 8 minutes ago, CBH1926 said: I saw somewhere that the shooter was convicted or charged with some sort of assault. Wouldn't he be prohibited from owning a gun in Canada? Lionized answered it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 10 minutes ago, CBH1926 said: I saw somewhere that the shooter was convicted or charged with some sort of assault. Wouldn't he be prohibited from owning a gun in Canada? 3 minutes ago, Lionized27 said: No. It would certainly ensure it would be more difficult to obtain his PAL though. 1 minute ago, Ryan Strome said: Lionized answered it. Actually the more I think about this if you're convicted of a violent crime it's pretty well impossible isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lionized27 Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 1 minute ago, Ryan Strome said: Actually the more I think about this if you're convicted of a violent crime it's pretty well impossible isn't it? Improbable but not impossible. The RCMP does weigh the circumstances surrounding any criminal offense when doing their background checks. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 @CBH1926 Authorized Possession Eligibility to Hold Licences General Rules Marginal note:Public safety 5 (1) A person is not eligible to hold a licence if it is desirable, in the interests of the safety of that or any other person, that the person not possess a firearm, a cross-bow, a prohibited weapon, a restricted weapon, a prohibited device, ammunition or prohibited ammunition. Marginal note:Criteria (2) In determining whether a person is eligible to hold a licence under subsection (1), a chief firearms officer or, on a reference under section 74, a provincial court judge shall have regard to whether the person, within the previous five years, (a) has been convicted or discharged under section 730 of the Criminal Code of (i) an offence in the commission of which violence against another person was used, threatened or attempted, (ii) an offence under this Act or Part III of the Criminal Code, (iii) an offence under section 264 of the Criminal Code (criminal harassment), (iv) an offence relating to the contravention of subsection 5(1) or (2), 6(1) or (2) or 7(1) of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, or (v) an offence relating to the contravention of subsection 9(1) or (2), 10(1) or (2), 11(1) or (2), 12(1), (4), (5), (6) or (7), 13(1) or 14(1) of the Cannabis Act; (b) has been treated for a mental illness, whether in a hospital, mental institute, psychiatric clinic or otherwise and whether or not the person was confined to such a hospital, institute or clinic, that was associated with violence or threatened or attempted violence on the part of the person against any person; or (c) has a history of behaviour that includes violence or threatened or attempted violence on the part of the person against any person. Marginal note:Exception (3) Despite subsection (2), in determining whether a non-resident who is 18 years old or older and by or on behalf of whom an application is made for a 60-day licence authorizing the non-resident to possess non-restricted firearms is eligible to hold a licence under subsection (1), a chief firearms officer or, on a reference under section 74, a provincial court judge may but need not have regard to the criteria described in subsection (2). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 Just now, Lionized27 said: Improbable but not impossible. The RCMP does weigh the circumstances surrounding any criminal offense when doing their background checks. Thanks, you're correct just read the fine print. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lionized27 Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 3 minutes ago, Ryan Strome said: Thanks, you're correct just read the fine print. Trust me, if an applicant has any kind of criminal record or has ever been arrested (not even charged with a crime) they should prepare for extreme scrutiny when applying for a PAL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Strome Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 7 minutes ago, Lionized27 said: Trust me, if an applicant has any kind of criminal record or has ever been arrested (not even charged with a crime) they should prepare for extreme scrutiny when applying for a PAL. I did know that. I can't remember all the ins and outs but I thought violent crimes were an immediate no go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RUPERTKBD Posted April 23, 2020 Share Posted April 23, 2020 32 minutes ago, Ryan Strome said: @Jimmy McGill @RUPERTKBD Not sure what this has to do with me.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now