Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

Coach Green

Rate this topic


wildcam

Recommended Posts

Some players play better when they play with highly talented, skilled and smart players because they are smart hockey players...OJ already has proven he can play very well with highly talented, skilled and smart hockey players when he played on the Finnish national team and with the London Knights...he just needs to get on the Canuck roster to prove his worth.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Chronic.Canucks.Fan said:

Yep, how dare he add Miller and Toffoli to the roster in addition to Pearson, Myers, Roussel. At the exorbitant cost of Gudbranson, 1st, 2nd, Madden, and some available cap space.

 

Real terrible position he put us in there.

 

Especially when you factor in that he's given us an awful, unspectacular, unremarkable pipeline of youth at all positions looking forward to the next 5 years. (Podkolzin, Hoglander, Lind, Woo, Rathbone, Juolevi, Rafferty, DiPietro...)

 

Can't wait until he's fired and the next GM can get rid of all those bums on our roster that he drafted. (Pettersson, Hughes, Boeser, Gaudette, Demko, Virtanen...)

You will always have some pathetic fans that will go on about nothing.. Real hockey fans know Jim Benning has done a very good job........

When Benning took over young talent under 23 was Horvat and Gaunce...We had no depth and no young prospects....

Now he has,  Petey , Hughes, Boser, Demko, Podkolzin,Virtanen, MacEwen,Lind, Jasek,  Hoglander, Juolevi, Dipietro, Rathbone, Briesbois, Woo, Gadjovich, Lockwood, Kielly G, Silovs G..

Jim has done a very good job and he has turned the corner..This Vancouver team is now a playoff team.We still have to make some changes..

Need a top # 2 D man like Risto from Buffalo, 25, 6'4 - 25 min guy would be great with Hughes..

Thanks Jim Benning...Go Canucks Go!

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Pete M said:

Some players play better when they play with highly talented, skilled and smart players because they are smart hockey players...OJ already has proven he can play very well with highly talented, skilled and smart hockey players when he played on the Finnish national team and with the London Knights...he just needs to get on the Canuck roster to prove his worth.

It has been said that OJ is 100% healthy and fit which is something that couldn't be said for years.  It was also said that he has a good attitude wrt fitness and preparation.

 

In his D+1 year, I think he figured he was a shoe in and didn't prepare properly so that year was underwhelming.   This happens to some high draft picks.  Character issue?  Maybe....same happened to Virtanen the year he was sent down to Utica to work with Green.  KIds have to reconcile expectations with reality.  And then came the injuries.  No excuses any more

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wildcam said:

You will always have some pathetic fans that will go on about nothing.. Real hockey fans know Jim Benning has done a very good job........

When Benning took over young talent under 23 was Horvat and Gaunce...We had no depth and no young prospects....

Now he has,  Petey , Hughes, Boser, Demko, Podkolzin,Virtanen, MacEwen,Lind, Jasek,  Hoglander, Juolevi, Dipietro, Rathbone, Briesbois, Woo, Gadjovich, Lockwood, Kielly G, Silovs G..

Jim has done a very good job and he has turned the corner..This Vancouver team is now a playoff team.We still have to make some changes..

Need a top # 2 D man like Risto from Buffalo, 25, 6'4 - 25 min guy would be great with Hughes..

Thanks Jim Benning...Go Canucks Go!

 

Sorry was suppose to be attached with one of the negative posts..Attached to wrong post...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Pete M said:

He definitely would have been "king of the draft" if he had taken Tkachuk....but credit where it is due, he has improved at picking players in the 1st round after he passed on MT.

but if he had would we have missed on Pete, Hughes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, hammertime said:

but if he had would we have missed on Pete, Hughes?

If Gillis had left Benning more to work with (eg., even just average drafting by his management), the Canucks would've finished higher in the standings and likely wouldn't have been able to draft EP at 6th overall.  :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, wildcam said:

 

What did Green do wrong? Coach Green was hired to take over coaching duties of the 28th place team in the league???????

It takes time to get your players on board and teach  new systems ..

You cannot judge Green on his first 2 years.. Green is doing a fine job and with the roster he has to coach now, things are getting very exciting..

Green was hired to save money, time to get coach with some experience so our players can get some experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/26/2020 at 12:38 PM, Pete M said:

zone entry is the system that requires the most improvement....I've said it 100 times, the use of the attack triangle allows for a puck possession game because it is a simple but effective system, it allows players to read and react to the play...simply, the puck is moved wide coming over the blue line with speed and the triangle is set up by having a player trailing and another going for the net. Once set up, so many different passing plays and chances can be made.

 

More often than not, when the attack triangle is set up, there is a very good scoring chance created. Dallas Stars use this system a lot ....the Canucks have started using this system the last dozen games with success....Miller, Pettersson, JV, Horvat, Toffoli all have scored by setting up the attack triangle.

 

Furthermore, because it is simple to set up and easy to react to and know where every player is on the ice, it can be executed with speed, which makes it difficult to defend (especially when there is an odd man rush.... 3 on 2, 4 on 3, etc.)

"I watched 'The Last Dance' and now I am a system expert. Triangle guys, triangle!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, gurn said:

Only 7 current coaches have more time served with their team than Green.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NHL_head_coaches

Oddly enough every one of them has a better winning percentage. 
 

Actually every coach on that list has a better winning percentage with their current team and only 3 coaches have a worse career record and we’re supposed be OK with that with the talent we have? Time to get your heads out of the sand.

Edited by Dumb Nuck
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On June 26, 2020 at 11:47 AM, Tre Mac said:

He's not much of a GM either

Well I would say Benning has turned this team around now...Go look at the team he had we he took over as GM ???? 

He had no young prospects and no depth on  team after the Sedins, Kesler and Burrows..... 

This is now a playoff team so not sure what hockey team your watching ?

Canucks now come to play every night, very exciting, team can score 8th in league and future is bright....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Dumb Nuck said:

Oddly enough every one of them has a better winning percentage. 
 

Actually every coach on that list has a better winning percentage with their current team and only 3 coaches have a worse career record and we’re supposed be OK with that with the talent we have? Time to get your heads out of the sand.

Team Year Regular season Postseason
G W L OTL Pts Finish W L Win % Result
VAN 2017–18 82 31 40 11 73 7th in Pacific Missed playoffs
VAN 2018–19 82 35 36 11 81 5th in Pacific Missed playoffs
VAN 2019–20 69 36 27 6 78 4th in Pacific TBD
Total 233 102 103 28      

 

Records contradict your spin on this. Rookie coach with a rebuilding team, can't expect a 60%+ win rate from the get go. Improvement every year is what I see.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/26/2020 at 9:28 AM, Tre Mac said:

Good on Green, love him as our coach - Benning..... not so much.  

Still mad about Eriksson, Gagner, and Schaller or what? Lol. Benning has been a damn fine GM as far as I am concerned. He literally came into this team with fossils for players and one prospect worth a damn. That was Horvat. Our 2nd best prospect (Shinkaruk) was only worth a bottom 6 player. Benning had some growing pains early but this team is in a great position. The only real blemish is Eriksson, and maybe taking Juolevi over Tkachuk/Sergachev. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, N7Nucks said:

Still mad about Eriksson, Gagner, and Schaller or what? Lol. Benning has been a damn fine GM as far as I am concerned. He literally came into this team with fossils for players and one prospect worth a damn. That was Horvat. Our 2nd best prospect (Shinkaruk) was only worth a bottom 6 player. Benning had some growing pains early but this team is in a great position. The only real blemish is Eriksson, and maybe taking Juolevi over Tkachuk/Sergachev. 

I believe benning has been doing great except eriksson but how do you predict that he would having fallen off the tracks in year one? 
but man it still stings on the tkachuck one, imagine where we would be 

Toffoli Petterson Miller 

Boeser Horvat tkachuck

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...