Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

[REPORT] Manny Malhotra to Toronto

Rate this topic


CRAZY_4_NAZZY

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, DeNiro said:

Malhotra has no experience playing on or running a power play.

 

He’s a great face off coach and great guy to have around the team but his actual coaching experience is very limited.

https://www.nhl.com/news/canucks-sign-malhotra/c-533452

 

'He turned his career around while playing for the Columbus Blue Jackets and coach Ken Hitchcock, averaging 11 goals and 29 points in five seasons. In 11 NHL seasons, Malhotra has 90 goals and 140 assists for 230 points in 705 games. He is minus-15 for his career with 385 penalty minutes. Malhotra has nine power-play goals, two shorthanded goals and 20 game-winners in his career.'

 

 

Add;

11 years, at that point, watching other coaches and players practice and play on the power play.

Edited by gurn
  • Cheers 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Seinfeld said:

Wow. First Luongo and now this. You would think Malhotra would have some loyalty towards the org? Guess not. 

Why should he?  The Canucks haven't seen fit to promote him.

 

If he has the opportunity for a promotion he should jump at it.  Even if it is Toronto.

  • Cheers 2
  • Upvote 1
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't see how retaining Brown and Baum behind our bench while allowing Manny slip away improves us in any respect whatsoever.

If they let Clark also be poached, Fransesco needs to pull Benning to one side, have a word.

Canuck player development has long been a mystery, and so losing popular, successful coaches only deepens that.

 

  • Like 1
  • Cheers 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, goalie13 said:

Why should he?  The Canucks haven't seen fit to promote him.

 

If he has the opportunity for a promotion he should jump at it.  Even if it is Toronto.

theres ~100 bench jobs in the NHL. Its more like a family business than a big corp in that way. Standing in the way of people's opportunities in this industry would be pretty slimy. 

  • Like 2
  • Cheers 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Robert Long said:

theres ~100 bench jobs in the NHL. Its more like a family business than a big corp in that way. Standing in the way of people's opportunities in this industry would be pretty slimy. 

Totally agree.  Don't understand why the previous poster saw it as a lack of loyalty.

  • Cheers 1
  • Upvote 2
  • Vintage 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mo Grit said:

Can't see how retaining Brown and Baum behind our bench while allowing Manny slip away improves us in any respect whatsoever.

If they let Clark also be poached, Fransesco needs to pull Benning to one side, have a word.

Canuck player development has long been a mystery, and so losing popular, successful coaches only deepens that.

 

Brown = Power Play 

Baumgartner = D-men 

 

Totally unrelated to Manny's work.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, gurn said:

https://www.nhl.com/news/canucks-sign-malhotra/c-533452

 

'He turned his career around while playing for the Columbus Blue Jackets and coach Ken Hitchcock, averaging 11 goals and 29 points in five seasons. In 11 NHL seasons, Malhotra has 90 goals and 140 assists for 230 points in 705 games. He is minus-15 for his career with 385 penalty minutes. Malhotra has nine power-play goals, two shorthanded goals and 20 game-winners in his career.'

 

 

Add;

11 years, at that point, watching other coaches and players practice and play on the power play.

That doesn’t make him a power play coach.

 

If he was gonna coach a unit the pk would be his expertise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Brown = Power Play 

Baumgartner = D-men 

Totally unrelated to Manny's work.  

If you're happy with our D-men and PowerPlay then yours is a fair comment.

But, holding a Status Quo doesn't equate to progress, in my opinion.

Manny may not have improved either, but he sure had the ear of our young guns.

B&B appeared to have lost that.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, goalie13 said:

Why should he?  The Canucks haven't seen fit to promote him.

 

If he has the opportunity for a promotion he should jump at it.  Even if it is Toronto.

Maybe it's just me, but I would rather keep building on those established relationships with players like Horvat, Pettersson, and Miller rather than jump to the next opportunity. The Canucks are on the rise and he just jumps ship like that? Why not be a part of something you helped build? He's been an assistant for 3 years, he's not some sort of long-time assistant coach waiting in the wings for a chance; he still has some dues to pay. Idk, loyalty is few and far between in professional sports I guess. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...