Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community
  • entries
    19
  • comments
    126
  • views
    46,304

No problems with the lines


Opmac

522 views

After blowing a 2-0 lead against the Los Angeles Kings in Game 2, many Canucks fans are calling for the lines to be changed up, Michael Grabner be inserted into the top-six, or Pavol Demitra to be scratched. I beg to differ, I have full confidence in the first, second, and third Canucks lines.

The Daniel Sedin, Henrik Sedin, and Alex Burrows line's track record since January 2009 speaks for itself.

The Pavol Demitra, Ryan Kesler, and Mikael Samuelsson line has potential to succeed. You have familiarity between Kesler and Demitra from the last half of the 2008-09 season playing with Sundin on the second line and the familiarity of Kesler and Samuelsson from playing together most of the 2009-10 season. You have the forechecker in Kesler, the playmaker in Demitra, and the goalscorer in Samuelsson. There is reason to believe that this line will work.

That line was invisible in Game 1, but improved greatly in Game 2. Kesler picked up two assists while Demitra assisted on Samuelsson's tally. Did anybody see Demitra's excitement on that goal? He was noticeable on the ice last night and played with passion. Baby steps...I expect even better and greater things in Game 3.

The Mason Raymond, Kyle Wellwood, and Jannik Hansen line has been the best line for the Canucks in the first two games of the series. The line has brought energy every shift and has hemmed the Kings in their own zone with their relentless forecheck. They have yet to score a goal, but it will come as they have generated numerous scoring chances.

All line proposals have called for a complete re-work of the units and that makes no sense to break up any of the top-three forward units because there are no problems with the Canucks forward group. Any problems that exist have been manufactured by panicking fans after a loss.

However, the fourth line which has featured whomever, Rick Rypien, and Steve Bernier raises some questions. This line has been benched in the third period and Manitoba Moose call-ups Matt Pettinger played 4:12 in Game 1 and Michael Grabner played 2:53 in Game 2. Which makes me wonder why they are even playing for the Canucks?

Pettinger was supposed to replace Ryan Johnson on the penalty kill, but Vigneault appears to have changed his mind on that one after he scratched him in Game 2 as he opted to go with the Ryan Kesler, Alex Burrows, Jannik Hansen, and Mason Raymond as his main penalty killers with Pavol Demitra taking the majority of the left-hand faceoffs.

Grabner is a one-dimensional, offensive player and he needs to be put into a scoring role in order to succeed, not three minutes a night on the fourth line. If he is not going to be getting quality minutes, get him, Pettinger, and Baumgartner down to the minors.

Baumgartner has also sat out as a healthy scratch all the games since March 5, except the last two of the regular season, as a healthy scratch and as the eighth defenceman.

Last night, the Manitoba Moose were hammered 8-2 by the Hamilton Bulldogs in the American Hockey League North Division semi-final on Sunday night and also lost in the series opener on April 15, 2-0. It appears the Moose are in need of difference makers and the Canucks are holding onto important Moose players, so they can sit in the press box or play a very limited role on the fourth line.

If Vigneault is not going to roll four lines, then what is the problem with slotting in Darcy Hordichuk or Tanner Glass on the fourth line for four minutes a night?

3 Comments


Recommended Comments

LA played a hell of a game ... forget the OT penalty and just look at how they played the entire game. Tough to get lines running smooth when penalty minutes take away from the last half of the regular game and not just Alberts to blame there were other penalties. Vancouvers defense looked good and so did Lou. Lots of missed shots that turned into a transition for LA.

Add all that up and the line setup was not an issue ...just a couple more mistakes than LA at a crucial point in the game.

Vancouver did not have a bad game ... we can play well and still loose the odd one -happens all the time in the playoffs.

I can bet people are already concerned ...we don't need to sweep anyone so LA probably did us a favor winning Sat night. I'm feeling a lot better about this series now, and I was feeling real good coming in........

Link to comment

A couple of things....

Kyle Wellwood hasn't been playing very well. He has made some awful attempts at passing, and judging by the reaction of the crowd, you can tell when he's screwed up. He has provided reasonable offense, but hasn't been able to keep any sustained pressure on them. His defensive play doesn't matter if that line can't outplay the Kings' third line, since they had around 50 goals collectively during the season.

There is a massive dilemma in the whole line-up thing though... with every loss comes a massive decrease in wiggle room. If we stay the course and the top line keeps sucking, we're going to be in a deep hole. The Sedins-Burrows line should definitely be on a short leash Monday.

What do you think about transforming all our youngsters into defensive forwards? It looks as if that's the direction AV's trying to lead Raymond and Hansen towards.

Link to comment
Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...