Jump to content
The Official Site of the Vancouver Canucks
Canucks Community

48MPHSlapShot

Members
  • Posts

    10,827
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by 48MPHSlapShot

  1. Had we managed to move Boeser for a good Dman or futures, or we had managed to move Myers, Dickinson or Poolman out, I doubt anyone would give a $&!# about Motte's return. But we didn't, so this is all we have to judge Allvin on.
  2. I mean, Rathbone was a 4th rd pick, and so was...."scans db for any notable 4th rd picks in franchise history"......Harold Snepsts!
  3. It'd be funny if we told Boston we would trade Garland to them for Debrusk if he signed a contract first, and then were just like "Nah nvm"
  4. So where are all the folk that kept saying it was a sellers market? Lol
  5. I guess this is what happens when you have a meddlesome mobster owner that won't let the team rebuild properly because of the off chance of a little bit more playoff revenue, a geriatric president, and a management staff that's half "old boy's club" and half diversity hires.
  6. It's not a Canucks TDL day if it doesn't end with CDC frothing at the mouth over incompetent management and meddlesome ownership
  7. We barely sold anything, and yet we're a worse hockey team. That is some next level failure
  8. Why are people arguing about Miller in the Garland thread? Go to the Miller thread ffs.
  9. Fair enough, but I still think it'd be a lateral move. I'd rather get a prospect or pick for Pearson.
  10. He's also more expensive, doesnt play as heavy of a game, and he produces at about the same clip as Pearson. Does he play the PK?
  11. Unless you expect Debrusk to break out, I don't see the point. Younger player than Pearson, but production is about the same and Pearson is cheaper.
  12. Not being traded. I know it's been all but confirmed Miller isn't going anywhere until at least the offseason, but it won't stop some people from being pissed I'm sure.
  13. Wait, so there's a way to do it other than getting the new guy and just hoping that somehow everything works out?
  14. In a few hours this thread is going to be full of angry people.
  15. Tanner has been a solid footsoldier for us, but if we can land an asset for him, I'm all for it. Won't be upset if we hold onto him either, as our LW is awfully shallow.
  16. According to reports, the Canucks have asked Tanner Pearson to waive his no trade clause. No clue how reliable the source is, but I figured it was worth a thread since we don't currently have a rumor thread for Pearson.
×
×
  • Create New...